Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 GDI |
2.36 L (2359 cc) |
0.6% bigger | 81 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 GDI Turbo |
1.59 L (1591 cc) |
32.2% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 112 hp from 1 L | 106 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 GDI Turbo |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 123 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 CRDi |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 30 cc to 1 mpg | 84 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 GDI |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 20 cc to 1 mpg | 77 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2359 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 81 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 GDI Turbo |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1591 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 112 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 106 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GDI Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 123 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 CRDi |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 30 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 84 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GDI |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 20 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CVVL |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 T-GDI |
1.59 L (1591 cc) |
32.2% smaller | 41 cc to 1 mpg | 113 hp from 1 L | 106 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 CRDi |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 29 cc to 1 mpg | 85 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
GT 2.0 T-GDI |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 119 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 GDI |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 13 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CVVL |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 T-GDI |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1591 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 41 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 113 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 106 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 CRDi |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 29 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | GT 2.0 T-GDI |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 119 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GDI |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 13 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.7 CRDI |
1.69 L (1685 cc) |
28.2% smaller | 32 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 112 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CVVL |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
GT 2.0 T-GDI |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 123 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 GDi |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 12 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.7 CRDI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.69 L (1685 cc) |
Difference from world average | 28.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 32 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 112 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CVVL |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | GT 2.0 T-GDI |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 123 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GDi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 12 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CVVL |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
1.7 CRDi |
1.69 L (1685 cc) |
28.2% smaller | 33 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 112 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 GDI |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 11 cc to 1 mpg | 77 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
GT 2.0 T-GDI |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 123 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CVVL |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.7 CRDi |
Precise engine size | 1.69 L (1685 cc) |
Difference from world average | 28.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 33 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 112 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GDI |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 11 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | GT 2.0 T-GDI |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 123 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 T-GDI |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 139 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 GDI |
2.36 L (2359 cc) |
0.6% bigger | 87 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CVVT 16V EcoDynamics |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 42 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
1.7 CRDi 16V |
1.69 L (1685 cc) |
28.2% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 112 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CVVT 16V |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i 16V Hybrid |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 T-GDI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 139 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDI |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2359 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 87 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CVVT 16V EcoDynamics |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 42 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.7 CRDi 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.69 L (1685 cc) |
Difference from world average | 28.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 112 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CVVT 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V Hybrid |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 CVVT |
2.36 L (2359 cc) |
0.6% bigger | 81 cc to 1 mpg | 76 hp from 1 L | 169 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CVVT 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 GDI |
2.36 L (2359 cc) |
0.6% bigger | 79 cc to 1 mpg | 85 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 T-GDI |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 139 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 CVVT |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2359 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 81 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 169 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CVVT 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDI |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2359 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 79 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 T-GDI |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 139 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CVVT |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.7 V6 |
2.66 L (2656 cc) |
13.2% bigger | 102 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 177 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CRDi |
1.99 L (1991 cc) |
15.1% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 CVVT |
2.36 L (2359 cc) |
0.6% bigger | - | 75 hp from 1 L | 169 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CVVT |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.7 V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.66 L (2656 cc) |
Difference from world average | 13.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 102 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 177 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1991 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 CVVT |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2359 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 169 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CRDi |
1.99 L (1991 cc) |
15.1% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CVVT |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 72 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.7i V6 24V |
2.66 L (2656 cc) |
13.2% bigger | 106 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 177 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1991 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CVVT |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.7i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.66 L (2656 cc) |
Difference from world average | 13.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 106 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 177 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 75 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
LX 2.4 |
2.35 L (2351 cc) |
0.2% bigger | - | 60 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.84 L (1836 cc) |
21.7% smaller | - | 73 hp from 1 L | 131 cc to 100 kg |
LX 2.7 V6 |
2.66 L (2656 cc) |
13.2% bigger | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 177 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 V6 |
2.49 L (2494 cc) |
6.3% bigger | - | 71 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | LX 2.4 |
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2351 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.84 L (1836 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 131 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | LX 2.7 V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.66 L (2656 cc) |
Difference from world average | 13.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 177 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2494 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 V6 |
2.49 L (2493 cc) |
6.3% bigger | 96 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.84 L (1836 cc) |
21.7% smaller | - | 73 hp from 1 L | 141 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
LX 2.4 |
2.35 L (2351 cc) |
0.2% bigger | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 157 cc to 100 kg |
LX 2.5 V6 |
2.49 L (2494 cc) |
6.3% bigger | - | 69 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
LX 2.7 V6 |
2.66 L (2656 cc) |
13.2% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 190 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2493 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 96 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.84 L (1836 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 141 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | LX 2.4 |
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2351 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 157 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | LX 2.5 V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2494 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | LX 2.7 V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.66 L (2656 cc) |
Difference from world average | 13.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 190 cc to 100 kg |