Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 MPI |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CRDi |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 44 cc to 1 mpg | 93 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 GDI |
2.36 L (2359 cc) |
0.6% bigger | 87 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 GDI |
1.59 L (1591 cc) |
32.2% smaller | 47 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 T-GDI |
1.59 L (1591 cc) |
32.2% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 111 hp from 1 L | 99 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 CRDi |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 35 cc to 1 mpg | 85 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 MPI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 44 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 93 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDI |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2359 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 87 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 GDI |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1591 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 47 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 T-GDI |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1591 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 111 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 99 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 CRDi |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 35 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 T-GDI |
1.59 L (1591 cc) |
32.2% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 111 hp from 1 L | 106 cc to 100 kg |
1.7 CRDi |
1.69 L (1685 cc) |
28.2% smaller | 34 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 120 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CRDi |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 44 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 GDI |
1.59 L (1591 cc) |
32.2% smaller | 45 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 GDI |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 95 cc to 1 mpg | 119 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 GDI |
2.36 L (2359 cc) |
0.6% bigger | 103 cc to 1 mpg | 77 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 T-GDI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1591 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 111 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 106 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.7 CRDi |
Precise engine size | 1.69 L (1685 cc) |
Difference from world average | 28.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 34 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 120 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 44 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 GDI |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1591 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 45 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GDI |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 95 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 119 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 GDI |
Precise engine size | 2.36 L (2359 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 103 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 GDI |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CRDi |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 92 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 GDI |
1.59 L (1591 cc) |
32.2% smaller | 45 cc to 1 mpg | 85 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
1.7 CRDi |
1.69 L (1685 cc) |
28.2% smaller | 38 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 112 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GDI |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 92 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 GDI |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1591 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 45 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.7 CRDi |
Precise engine size | 1.69 L (1685 cc) |
Difference from world average | 28.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 38 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 112 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 16V |
1.59 L (1591 cc) |
32.2% smaller | 45 cc to 1 mpg | 85 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
1.7 CRDI |
1.69 L (1685 cc) |
28.2% smaller | - | 68 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 CRDI |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 92 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1591 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 45 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.7 CRDI |
Precise engine size | 1.69 L (1685 cc) |
Difference from world average | 28.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDI |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 92 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CRDi |
1.99 L (1991 cc) |
15.1% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 124 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V |
1.98 L (1975 cc) |
15.8% smaller | 68 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
2.7 V6 |
2.66 L (2657 cc) |
13.3% bigger | 111 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1991 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 124 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1975 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 68 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.7 V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.66 L (2657 cc) |
Difference from world average | 13.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 111 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V |
1.98 L (1975 cc) |
15.8% smaller | 68 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 116 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CRDi |
1.99 L (1991 cc) |
15.1% smaller | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i 16V |
1.98 L (1975 cc) |
15.8% smaller | - | 71 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
2.7 i V6 |
2.66 L (2656 cc) |
13.2% bigger | 111 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1975 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 68 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 116 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CRDi |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1991 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.98 L (1975 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.7 i V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.66 L (2656 cc) |
Difference from world average | 13.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 111 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 59 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TD |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 42 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TD Wagon |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 42 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V Wagon |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 48 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 42 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD Wagon |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 42 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V Wagon |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 48 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 95 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 48 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 59 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TD |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 42 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 95 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 48 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 42 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TD |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 42 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 59 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 105 cc to 1 mpg | 48 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 D |
2.18 L (2184 cc) |
6.9% smaller | - | 29 hp from 1 L | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 42 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 105 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 48 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 D |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2184 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 29 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 146 cc to 100 kg |