Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1600 |
1.59 L (1585 cc) |
32.4% smaller | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 144 cc to 100 kg |
2000 |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 60 hp from 1 L | 181 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1600 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1585 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 144 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2000 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 181 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000 |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 60 hp from 1 L | 181 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2000 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 181 cc to 100 kg |