cat_logo
HomeLancia

Dedra

Lancia Dedra Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Choose Generation

Average Engine Size Lancia Dedra

Lancia Dedra 1994

1994 Dedra Station Wagon (835)

Quick notes on Lancia Dedra engine size

    • Average size for generation: 1.82 L (1821 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1581 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1995 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.53 L smaller (-525 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 16 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 364 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6561 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.4 L bigger (+1397 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 89 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

1994 Lancia Dedra

  • 1.6 —1581 cc (1581 L)
  • 1.8 GT 16V —1747 cc (1747 L)
  • 1.8 LE —1747 cc (1747 L)
  • 1.8 —1756 cc (1756 L)
  • 1.9 TDS —1929 cc (1929 L)
  • 2.0 16V —1995 cc (1995 L)
  • 2.0 16V 4X4 —1995 cc (1995 L)

    1994 Lancia Dedra Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6 —17.6 cc/hp (24 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 GT 16V —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 LE —15.5 cc/hp (21 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 —17.4 cc/hp (23.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 TDS —21.4 cc/hp (29.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 16V —14.4 cc/hp (19.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 16V 4X4 —14.4 cc/hp (19.6 cc/kW)

    1994 Lancia Dedra Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6 —32.61 or 765 cc smaller
  • 1.8 GT 16V —25.53 or 599 cc smaller
  • 1.8 LE —25.53 or 599 cc smaller
  • 1.8 —25.15 or 590 cc smaller
  • 1.9 TDS —17.77 or 417 cc smaller
  • 2.0 16V —14.96 or 351 cc smaller
  • 2.0 16V 4X4 —14.96 or 351 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6 1.58 L
    (1581 cc)     		32.6% smaller 53 cc to 1 mpg 57 hp from 1 L 132 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 GT 16V 1.75 L
    (1747 cc)     		25.5% smaller 62 cc to 1 mpg 75 hp from 1 L 125 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 LE 1.75 L
    (1747 cc)     		25.5% smaller 58 cc to 1 mpg 65 hp from 1 L 125 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 1.76 L
    (1756 cc)     		25.1% smaller 61 cc to 1 mpg 57 hp from 1 L 135 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 TDS 1.93 L
    (1929 cc)     		17.8% smaller 51 cc to 1 mpg 47 hp from 1 L -
    2.0 16V 2 L
    (1995 cc)     		15% smaller 77 cc to 1 mpg 70 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 16V 4X4 2 L
    (1995 cc)     		15% smaller 83 cc to 1 mpg 70 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6
    Precise engine size 1.58 L (1581 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 53 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 132 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 GT 16V
    Precise engine size 1.75 L (1747 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 62 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 125 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 LE
    Precise engine size 1.75 L (1747 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 58 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 65 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 125 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1756 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 61 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 135 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 TDS
    Precise engine size 1.93 L (1929 cc)
    Difference from world average 17.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 51 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 47 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0 16V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1995 cc)
    Difference from world average 15 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 77 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 70 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 16V 4X4
    Precise engine size 2 L (1995 cc)
    Difference from world average 15 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 83 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 70 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg

    Lancia Dedra 1989

    1989 Dedra (835)

    Quick notes on Lancia Dedra engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.83 L (1825 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1581 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1995 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.52 L smaller (-521 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 16 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 365 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6557 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.4 L bigger (+1401 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 95 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1989 Lancia Dedra

  • 2.0 i.e. —1995 cc (1995 L)
  • 1.6 i.e. —1581 cc (1581 L)
  • 1.6 LE —1581 cc (1581 L)
  • 1.8 i.e. —1756 cc (1756 L)
  • 1.8 GT 16V —1747 cc (1747 L)
  • 1.8 LE —1747 cc (1747 L)
  • 1.8 i.e. LE —1756 cc (1756 L)
  • 1.9 TDS —1929 cc (1929 L)
  • 2.0 HF Integrale 4WD —1995 cc (1995 L)
  • 2.0 16V —1995 cc (1995 L)
  • 2.0 i.e. Turbo —1995 cc (1995 L)

    1989 Lancia Dedra Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 i.e. —17.7 cc/hp (24 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 i.e. —20.3 cc/hp (27.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 LE —17.6 cc/hp (24 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 i.e. —17.4 cc/hp (23.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 GT 16V —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 LE —15.5 cc/hp (21 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 i.e. LE —19.5 cc/hp (26.6 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 TDS —21.4 cc/hp (29.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 HF Integrale 4WD —11.8 cc/hp (16.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 16V —14.4 cc/hp (19.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 i.e. Turbo —12.3 cc/hp (16.8 cc/kW)

    1989 Lancia Dedra Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 i.e. —14.96 or 351 cc smaller
  • 1.6 i.e. —32.61 or 765 cc smaller
  • 1.6 LE —32.61 or 765 cc smaller
  • 1.8 i.e. —25.15 or 590 cc smaller
  • 1.8 GT 16V —25.53 or 599 cc smaller
  • 1.8 LE —25.53 or 599 cc smaller
  • 1.8 i.e. LE —25.15 or 590 cc smaller
  • 1.9 TDS —17.77 or 417 cc smaller
  • 2.0 HF Integrale 4WD —14.96 or 351 cc smaller
  • 2.0 16V —14.96 or 351 cc smaller
  • 2.0 i.e. Turbo —14.96 or 351 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 i.e. 2 L
    (1995 cc)     		15% smaller 77 cc to 1 mpg 57 hp from 1 L 166 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 i.e. 1.58 L
    (1581 cc)     		32.6% smaller - 49 hp from 1 L 144 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 LE 1.58 L
    (1581 cc)     		32.6% smaller 49 cc to 1 mpg 57 hp from 1 L 144 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 i.e. 1.76 L
    (1756 cc)     		25.1% smaller 59 cc to 1 mpg 57 hp from 1 L 146 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 GT 16V 1.75 L
    (1747 cc)     		25.5% smaller 62 cc to 1 mpg 75 hp from 1 L 134 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 LE 1.75 L
    (1747 cc)     		25.5% smaller 56 cc to 1 mpg 65 hp from 1 L 134 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 i.e. LE 1.76 L
    (1756 cc)     		25.1% smaller 63 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 146 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 TDS 1.93 L
    (1929 cc)     		17.8% smaller 49 cc to 1 mpg 47 hp from 1 L 161 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 HF Integrale 4WD 2 L
    (1995 cc)     		15% smaller 83 cc to 1 mpg 85 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 16V 2 L
    (1995 cc)     		15% smaller 74 cc to 1 mpg 70 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 i.e. Turbo 2 L
    (1995 cc)     		15% smaller 77 cc to 1 mpg 81 hp from 1 L 166 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i.e.
    Precise engine size 2 L (1995 cc)
    Difference from world average 15 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 77 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 166 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 i.e.
    Precise engine size 1.58 L (1581 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 49 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 144 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 LE
    Precise engine size 1.58 L (1581 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 49 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 144 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 i.e.
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1756 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 59 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 146 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 GT 16V
    Precise engine size 1.75 L (1747 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 62 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 134 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 LE
    Precise engine size 1.75 L (1747 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 56 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 65 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 134 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 i.e. LE
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1756 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 63 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 146 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 TDS
    Precise engine size 1.93 L (1929 cc)
    Difference from world average 17.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 49 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 47 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 161 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 HF Integrale 4WD
    Precise engine size 2 L (1995 cc)
    Difference from world average 15 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 83 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 85 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 16V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1995 cc)
    Difference from world average 15 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 74 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 70 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i.e. Turbo
    Precise engine size 2 L (1995 cc)
    Difference from world average 15 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 77 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 81 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 166 cc to 100 kg