Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 D150 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 46 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D180 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 90 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D240 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 120 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 P200 |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 100 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 P250 |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 125 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D150 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 46 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D180 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 90 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D240 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 P200 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 100 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 P250 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 125 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 42 cc to 1 mpg | 90 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 SD4 |
2.18 L (2179 cc) |
7.1% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 87 hp from 1 L | 115 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 TD4 |
2.18 L (2179 cc) |
7.1% smaller | 57 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 115 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Si4 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 120 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 SD4 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 120 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TD4 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 90 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 eD4 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 42 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 90 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 SD4 |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2179 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 87 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 115 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 TD4 |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2179 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 57 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 115 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Si4 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 SD4 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD4 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 90 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 eD4 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |