Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 eD4 |
2.18 L (2179 cc) |
7.1% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 TD4 |
2.18 L (2179 cc) |
7.1% smaller | 57 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 121 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Si4 GTDi |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 120 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 SD4 |
2.18 L (2179 cc) |
7.1% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 87 hp from 1 L | 121 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 eD4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2179 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 TD4 |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2179 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 57 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 121 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Si4 GTDi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 SD4 |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2179 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 87 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 121 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 TD4 |
2.18 L (2179 cc) |
7.1% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 121 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 SD4 |
2.18 L (2179 cc) |
7.1% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 87 hp from 1 L | 121 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 eD4 |
2.18 L (2179 cc) |
7.1% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 TD4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2179 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 121 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 SD4 |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2179 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 87 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 121 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 eD4 |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2179 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 TD4 |
2.18 L (2179 cc) |
7.1% smaller | 70 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 121 cc to 100 kg |
3.2 i V6 24V |
3.19 L (3192 cc) |
36.1% bigger | 152 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 177 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 TD4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2179 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 70 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 121 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.2 i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 3.19 L (3192 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 152 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 177 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TD4 |
1.95 L (1950 cc) |
16.9% smaller | 63 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i 16V |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 75 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 DI |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 49 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 V6 24V |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | 131 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.95 L (1950 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 63 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 75 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 DI |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 49 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 131 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TD4 |
1.95 L (1951 cc) |
16.8% smaller | 63 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 DI |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 49 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i 16V |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 V6 24V |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | 131 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.95 L (1951 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 63 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 DI |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 49 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 131 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i 16V |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TD |
1.95 L (1950 cc) |
16.9% smaller | - | 57 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 i V6 24V |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | - | 71 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Precise engine size | 1.95 L (1950 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |