Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 Si4 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 100 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Td4 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 45 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Sd4 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 120 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Si4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 100 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Td4 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 45 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Sd4 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 TD4 |
2.18 L (2179 cc) |
7.1% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 SD4 |
2.18 L (2179 cc) |
7.1% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 87 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Si4 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 120 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 eD4 |
2.18 L (2179 cc) |
7.1% smaller | 45 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 TD4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2179 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 SD4 |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2179 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 87 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Si4 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 eD4 |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2179 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 45 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 Si4 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 120 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TD4 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 42 cc to 1 mpg | 90 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Si4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD4 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 42 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 90 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TD4 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 41 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Si4 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 120 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 41 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Si4 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TD4 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Si4 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 120 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Si4 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 TD4 |
2.18 L (2179 cc) |
7.1% smaller | 61 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 SD4 |
2.18 L (2179 cc) |
7.1% smaller | 61 cc to 1 mpg | 87 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 eD4 |
2.18 L (2179 cc) |
7.1% smaller | 46 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 136 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Si4 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 120 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 TD4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2179 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 61 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 SD4 |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2179 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 61 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 87 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 eD4 |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2179 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 46 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Si4 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |