Mazda 3 Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Average Engine Size Mazda 3

Quick notes on Mazda 3 engine size

    • Average size for generation: 1.96 L (1956 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1496 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2488 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.39 L smaller (-390 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 13 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 391 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6426 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.53 L bigger (+1532 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 113 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2019 Mazda 3 IV Sedan engine size

  • 2.0 SkyActiv-G —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0 SkyActiv-X —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 1.8 SkyActiv-D —1759 cc (1759 L)
  • 2.5 SkyActiv-G —2488 cc (2488 L)
  • 1.5 SKYACTIV-G —1496 cc (1496 L)
  • 2.0 SKYACTIV-G —1998 cc (1998 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 SkyActiv-G —16.4 cc/hp (22.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 SkyActiv-X —11 cc/hp (15 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 SkyActiv-D —15.2 cc/hp (20.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.5 SkyActiv-G —13.4 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 SKYACTIV-G —12.7 cc/hp (17.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 SKYACTIV-G —12.3 cc/hp (16.8 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 SkyActiv-G —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0 SkyActiv-X —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 1.8 SkyActiv-D —25.02 or 587 cc smaller
  • 2.5 SkyActiv-G —6.05 or 142 cc bigger
  • 1.5 SKYACTIV-G —36.23 or 850 cc smaller
  • 2.0 SKYACTIV-G —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 SkyActiv-G 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 46 cc to 1 mpg 61 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 SkyActiv-X 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller - 91 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 SkyActiv-D 1.76 L
    (1759 cc)
    25% smaller 31 cc to 1 mpg 66 hp from 1 L 126 cc to 100 kg
    2.5 SkyActiv-G 2.49 L
    (2488 cc)
    6.1% bigger - 75 hp from 1 L -
    1.5 SKYACTIV-G 1.5 L
    (1496 cc)
    36.2% smaller - 79 hp from 1 L 107 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 SKYACTIV-G 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller - 81 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 SkyActiv-G
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 46 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 SkyActiv-X
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 91 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 SkyActiv-D
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1759 cc)
    Difference from world average 25 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 31 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 126 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 SkyActiv-G
    Precise engine size 2.49 L (2488 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.1 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 1.5 SKYACTIV-G
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1496 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 79 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 107 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 SKYACTIV-G
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 81 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 3 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.96 L (1956 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1496 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2488 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.39 L smaller (-390 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 13 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 391 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6426 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.53 L bigger (+1532 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 113 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2019 Mazda 3 IV Hatchback engine size

  • 2.0 SkyActiv-G —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0 SkyActiv-X —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 1.8 SkyActiv-D —1759 cc (1759 L)
  • 1.5 SKYACTIV-G —1496 cc (1496 L)
  • 2.0 SKYACTIV-G —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.5 SkyActiv-G —2488 cc (2488 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 SkyActiv-G —16.4 cc/hp (22.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 SkyActiv-X —11 cc/hp (15 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 SkyActiv-D —15.2 cc/hp (20.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 SKYACTIV-G —12.7 cc/hp (17.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 SKYACTIV-G —12.3 cc/hp (16.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.5 SkyActiv-G —13.4 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 SkyActiv-G —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0 SkyActiv-X —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 1.8 SkyActiv-D —25.02 or 587 cc smaller
  • 1.5 SKYACTIV-G —36.23 or 850 cc smaller
  • 2.0 SKYACTIV-G —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.5 SkyActiv-G —6.05 or 142 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 SkyActiv-G 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 46 cc to 1 mpg 61 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 SkyActiv-X 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller - 91 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 SkyActiv-D 1.76 L
    (1759 cc)
    25% smaller 35 cc to 1 mpg 66 hp from 1 L 126 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 SKYACTIV-G 1.5 L
    (1496 cc)
    36.2% smaller - 79 hp from 1 L 107 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 SKYACTIV-G 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller - 81 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    2.5 SkyActiv-G 2.49 L
    (2488 cc)
    6.1% bigger - 75 hp from 1 L -
    Vehicle 2.0 SkyActiv-G
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 46 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 SkyActiv-X
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 91 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 SkyActiv-D
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1759 cc)
    Difference from world average 25 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 35 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 126 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 SKYACTIV-G
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1496 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 79 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 107 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 SKYACTIV-G
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 81 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 SkyActiv-G
    Precise engine size 2.49 L (2488 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.1 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -

    Quick notes on Mazda 3 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.04 L (2044 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1499 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2488 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.3 L smaller (-302 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 409 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6338 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.62 L bigger (+1620 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 135 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2017 Mazda 3 III Sedan (BM, facelift 2017) engine size

  • 2.0 SkyActiv-G —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 1.5 SkyActiv-D —1499 cc (1499 L)
  • 2.2 SkyActiv-D —2191 cc (2191 L)
  • 2.5 SkyActiv-G —2488 cc (2488 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 SkyActiv-G —12.9 cc/hp (17.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 SkyActiv-D —14.3 cc/hp (19.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 SkyActiv-D —14.6 cc/hp (19.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.5 SkyActiv-G —13.5 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 SkyActiv-G —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 1.5 SkyActiv-D —36.1 or 847 cc smaller
  • 2.2 SkyActiv-D —6.61 or 155 cc smaller
  • 2.5 SkyActiv-G —6.05 or 142 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 SkyActiv-G 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 64 cc to 1 mpg 78 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 SkyActiv-D 1.5 L
    (1499 cc)
    36.1% smaller 24 cc to 1 mpg 70 hp from 1 L 115 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 SkyActiv-D 2.19 L
    (2191 cc)
    6.6% smaller 37 cc to 1 mpg 68 hp from 1 L 169 cc to 100 kg
    2.5 SkyActiv-G 2.49 L
    (2488 cc)
    6.1% bigger 83 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 178 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 SkyActiv-G
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 64 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 78 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 SkyActiv-D
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1499 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 24 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 70 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 115 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 SkyActiv-D
    Precise engine size 2.19 L (2191 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 37 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 68 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 169 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 SkyActiv-G
    Precise engine size 2.49 L (2488 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.1 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 83 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 178 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 3 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.93 L (1934 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1496 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2488 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.41 L smaller (-412 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 387 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6448 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.51 L bigger (+1510 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 130 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2017 Mazda 3 III Hatchback (BM, facelift 2017) engine size

  • 2.0 SkyActiv-G —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 1.5 SkyActiv-G —1496 cc (1496 L)
  • 2.2 SkyActiv-D —2191 cc (2191 L)
  • 1.5 SkyActiv-D —1499 cc (1499 L)
  • 2.5 SkyActiv-G —2488 cc (2488 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 SkyActiv-G —12.9 cc/hp (17.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 SkyActiv-G —15 cc/hp (20.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 SkyActiv-D —14.6 cc/hp (19.9 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 SkyActiv-D —14.3 cc/hp (19.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.5 SkyActiv-G —13.5 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 SkyActiv-G —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 1.5 SkyActiv-G —36.23 or 850 cc smaller
  • 2.2 SkyActiv-D —6.61 or 155 cc smaller
  • 1.5 SkyActiv-D —36.1 or 847 cc smaller
  • 2.5 SkyActiv-G —6.05 or 142 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 SkyActiv-G 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 64 cc to 1 mpg 78 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 SkyActiv-G 1.5 L
    (1496 cc)
    36.2% smaller 33 cc to 1 mpg 67 hp from 1 L 125 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 SkyActiv-D 2.19 L
    (2191 cc)
    6.6% smaller 45 cc to 1 mpg 68 hp from 1 L 169 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 SkyActiv-D 1.5 L
    (1499 cc)
    36.1% smaller 28 cc to 1 mpg 70 hp from 1 L 115 cc to 100 kg
    2.5 SkyActiv-G 2.49 L
    (2488 cc)
    6.1% bigger 89 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 178 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 SkyActiv-G
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 64 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 78 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 SkyActiv-G
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1496 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 33 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 67 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 125 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 SkyActiv-D
    Precise engine size 2.19 L (2191 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 45 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 68 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 169 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 SkyActiv-D
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1499 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 28 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 70 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 115 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 SkyActiv-G
    Precise engine size 2.49 L (2488 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.1 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 89 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 178 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 3 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.84 L (1836 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1496 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.2 L (2191 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.51 L smaller (-510 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 367 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6546 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.41 L bigger (+1412 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 133 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2014 Mazda 3 III Sedan (BM) engine size

  • 2.0 SkyActiv-G —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 1.5 SkyActiv-G —1496 cc (1496 L)
  • 2.0 Skyactiv-G —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.2 SkyActiv-D —2191 cc (2191 L)
  • 1.5 Skyactiv-D —1498 cc (1498 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 SkyActiv-G —16.7 cc/hp (22.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 SkyActiv-G —15 cc/hp (20.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 Skyactiv-G —12.1 cc/hp (16.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 SkyActiv-D —14.6 cc/hp (19.9 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 Skyactiv-D —14.3 cc/hp (19.5 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 SkyActiv-G —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 1.5 SkyActiv-G —36.23 or 850 cc smaller
  • 2.0 Skyactiv-G —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.2 SkyActiv-D —6.61 or 155 cc smaller
  • 1.5 Skyactiv-D —36.15 or 848 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 SkyActiv-G 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 48 cc to 1 mpg 60 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 SkyActiv-G 1.5 L
    (1496 cc)
    36.2% smaller 32 cc to 1 mpg 67 hp from 1 L 125 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 Skyactiv-G 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 49 cc to 1 mpg 83 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 SkyActiv-D 2.19 L
    (2191 cc)
    6.6% smaller 45 cc to 1 mpg 68 hp from 1 L 169 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 Skyactiv-D 1.5 L
    (1498 cc)
    36.1% smaller 28 cc to 1 mpg 70 hp from 1 L 115 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 SkyActiv-G
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 48 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 60 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 SkyActiv-G
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1496 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 32 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 67 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 125 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 Skyactiv-G
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 49 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 83 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 SkyActiv-D
    Precise engine size 2.19 L (2191 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 45 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 68 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 169 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 Skyactiv-D
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1498 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 28 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 70 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 115 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 3 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.8 L (1796 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1496 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.2 L (2191 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.55 L smaller (-550 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 359 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6586 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.37 L bigger (+1372 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 141 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    2013 Mazda 3 III Hatchback (BM) engine size

  • 1.5 SkyActiv-G —1496 cc (1496 L)
  • 2.0 SkyActiv-G —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.2 SkyActiv-D —2191 cc (2191 L)
  • 1.5 Skyactiv-D —1498 cc (1498 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.5 SkyActiv-G —15 cc/hp (20.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 SkyActiv-G —12.1 cc/hp (16.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 SkyActiv-D —14.6 cc/hp (19.9 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 Skyactiv-D —14.3 cc/hp (19.5 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.5 SkyActiv-G —36.23 or 850 cc smaller
  • 2.0 SkyActiv-G —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.2 SkyActiv-D —6.61 or 155 cc smaller
  • 1.5 Skyactiv-D —36.15 or 848 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.5 SkyActiv-G 1.5 L
    (1496 cc)
    36.2% smaller 33 cc to 1 mpg 67 hp from 1 L 125 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 SkyActiv-G 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 49 cc to 1 mpg 83 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 SkyActiv-D 2.19 L
    (2191 cc)
    6.6% smaller 45 cc to 1 mpg 68 hp from 1 L 169 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 Skyactiv-D 1.5 L
    (1498 cc)
    36.1% smaller 28 cc to 1 mpg 70 hp from 1 L 115 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 SkyActiv-G
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1496 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 33 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 67 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 125 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 SkyActiv-G
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 49 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 83 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 SkyActiv-D
    Precise engine size 2.19 L (2191 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 45 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 68 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 169 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 Skyactiv-D
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1498 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 28 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 70 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 115 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 3 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.97 L (1969 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1560 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.3 L (2261 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.38 L smaller (-377 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 12 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 394 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6413 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.55 L bigger (+1545 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 140 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2011 Mazda 3 II Hatchback (BL, facelift 2011) engine size

  • MPS 2.3i —2261 cc (2261 L)
  • 1.6i —1598 cc (1598 L)
  • 2.0 CD —2184 cc (2184 L)
  • 2.0 DISI —1999 cc (1999 L)
  • 2.0i —1999 cc (1999 L)
  • 2.2 CD —2184 cc (2184 L)
  • 1.6 CD —1560 cc (1560 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • MPS 2.3i —8.7 cc/hp (11.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.6i —15.2 cc/hp (20.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 CD —14.6 cc/hp (19.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 DISI —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0i —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 CD —11.8 cc/hp (16.1 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 CD —13.6 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • MPS 2.3i —3.62 or 85 cc smaller
  • 1.6i —31.88 or 748 cc smaller
  • 2.0 CD —6.91 or 162 cc smaller
  • 2.0 DISI —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • 2.0i —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • 2.2 CD —6.91 or 162 cc smaller
  • 1.6 CD —33.5 or 786 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    MPS 2.3i 2.26 L
    (2261 cc)
    3.6% smaller 94 cc to 1 mpg 115 hp from 1 L 162 cc to 100 kg
    1.6i 1.6 L
    (1598 cc)
    31.9% smaller 43 cc to 1 mpg 66 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 CD 2.18 L
    (2184 cc)
    6.9% smaller 49 cc to 1 mpg 69 hp from 1 L 156 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 DISI 2 L
    (1999 cc)
    14.8% smaller 57 cc to 1 mpg 75 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.0i 2 L
    (1999 cc)
    14.8% smaller 64 cc to 1 mpg 75 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 CD 2.18 L
    (2184 cc)
    6.9% smaller 50 cc to 1 mpg 85 hp from 1 L 156 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 CD 1.56 L
    (1560 cc)
    33.5% smaller 28 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 120 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle MPS 2.3i
    Precise engine size 2.26 L (2261 cc)
    Difference from world average 3.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 94 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 115 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 162 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6i
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1598 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 43 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 CD
    Precise engine size 2.18 L (2184 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 49 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 69 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 156 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 DISI
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 57 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0i
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 64 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 CD
    Precise engine size 2.18 L (2184 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 50 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 85 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 156 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 CD
    Precise engine size 1.56 L (1560 cc)
    Difference from world average 33.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 28 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 120 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 3 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.79 L (1789 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1560 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1999 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.56 L smaller (-557 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 358 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6593 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.37 L bigger (+1365 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 111 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    2011 Mazda 3 II Sedan (BL, facelift 2011) engine size

  • 1.6i —1598 cc (1598 L)
  • 2.0 DISI —1999 cc (1999 L)
  • 2.0i —1999 cc (1999 L)
  • 1.6 CD —1560 cc (1560 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6i —15.2 cc/hp (20.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 DISI —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0i —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 CD —13.4 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6i —31.88 or 748 cc smaller
  • 2.0 DISI —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • 2.0i —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • 1.6 CD —33.5 or 786 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6i 1.6 L
    (1598 cc)
    31.9% smaller 43 cc to 1 mpg 66 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 DISI 2 L
    (1999 cc)
    14.8% smaller 57 cc to 1 mpg 75 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.0i 2 L
    (1999 cc)
    14.8% smaller 64 cc to 1 mpg 75 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 CD 1.56 L
    (1560 cc)
    33.5% smaller 28 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 130 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6i
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1598 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 43 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 DISI
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 57 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0i
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 64 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 CD
    Precise engine size 1.56 L (1560 cc)
    Difference from world average 33.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 28 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 130 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 3 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.58 L (1579 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1560 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1598 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.77 L smaller (-767 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 316 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.8 L smaller (-6803 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.16 L bigger (+1155 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 132 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    2012 Mazda 3 TAKUMI engine size

  • 1.6 i —1598 cc (1598 L)
  • 1.6 CD —1560 cc (1560 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6 i —13.8 cc/hp (18.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 CD —13.4 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6 i —31.88 or 748 cc smaller
  • 1.6 CD —33.5 or 786 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6 i 1.6 L
    (1598 cc)
    31.9% smaller 43 cc to 1 mpg 73 hp from 1 L 123 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 CD 1.56 L
    (1560 cc)
    33.5% smaller 28 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 120 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 i
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1598 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 43 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 73 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 123 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 CD
    Precise engine size 1.56 L (1560 cc)
    Difference from world average 33.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 28 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 120 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 3 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.87 L (1868 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1560 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.2 L (2184 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.48 L smaller (-478 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 13 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 374 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6514 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.44 L bigger (+1444 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 128 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2009 Mazda 3 II Sedan (BL) engine size

  • 1.6 CD —1560 cc (1560 L)
  • 2.2 CD —2184 cc (2184 L)
  • 1.6i —1598 cc (1598 L)
  • 2.0i —1999 cc (1999 L)
  • 2.0 DISI —1999 cc (1999 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6 CD —14.3 cc/hp (19.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 CD —11.8 cc/hp (16.1 cc/kW)
  • 1.6i —15.2 cc/hp (20.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.0i —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 DISI —13.2 cc/hp (18 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6 CD —33.5 or 786 cc smaller
  • 2.2 CD —6.91 or 162 cc smaller
  • 1.6i —31.88 or 748 cc smaller
  • 2.0i —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • 2.0 DISI —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6 CD 1.56 L
    (1560 cc)
    33.5% smaller 29 cc to 1 mpg 70 hp from 1 L 130 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 CD 2.18 L
    (2184 cc)
    6.9% smaller 52 cc to 1 mpg 85 hp from 1 L 156 cc to 100 kg
    1.6i 1.6 L
    (1598 cc)
    31.9% smaller 43 cc to 1 mpg 66 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    2.0i 2 L
    (1999 cc)
    14.8% smaller 64 cc to 1 mpg 75 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 DISI 2 L
    (1999 cc)
    14.8% smaller 57 cc to 1 mpg 76 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 CD
    Precise engine size 1.56 L (1560 cc)
    Difference from world average 33.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 29 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 70 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 130 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 CD
    Precise engine size 2.18 L (2184 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 52 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 85 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 156 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6i
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1598 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 43 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0i
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 64 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 DISI
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 57 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 76 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 3 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.97 L (1969 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1560 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.3 L (2261 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.38 L smaller (-377 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 12 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 394 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6413 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.55 L bigger (+1545 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 140 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2009 Mazda 3 II Hatchback (BL) engine size

  • 2.2 CD —2184 cc (2184 L)
  • 2.0i —1999 cc (1999 L)
  • 1.6i —1598 cc (1598 L)
  • 2.0 DISI —1999 cc (1999 L)
  • 2.0 CD —2184 cc (2184 L)
  • 1.6 CD —1560 cc (1560 L)
  • MPS 2.3i —2261 cc (2261 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.2 CD —11.8 cc/hp (16.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.0i —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.6i —15.2 cc/hp (20.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 DISI —13.2 cc/hp (18 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 CD —14.6 cc/hp (19.9 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 CD —13.6 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)
  • MPS 2.3i —8.7 cc/hp (11.8 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.2 CD —6.91 or 162 cc smaller
  • 2.0i —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • 1.6i —31.88 or 748 cc smaller
  • 2.0 DISI —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • 2.0 CD —6.91 or 162 cc smaller
  • 1.6 CD —33.5 or 786 cc smaller
  • MPS 2.3i —3.62 or 85 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.2 CD 2.18 L
    (2184 cc)
    6.9% smaller 52 cc to 1 mpg 85 hp from 1 L 156 cc to 100 kg
    2.0i 2 L
    (1999 cc)
    14.8% smaller 64 cc to 1 mpg 75 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    1.6i 1.6 L
    (1598 cc)
    31.9% smaller 43 cc to 1 mpg 66 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 DISI 2 L
    (1999 cc)
    14.8% smaller 57 cc to 1 mpg 76 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 CD 2.18 L
    (2184 cc)
    6.9% smaller 50 cc to 1 mpg 69 hp from 1 L 156 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 CD 1.56 L
    (1560 cc)
    33.5% smaller 29 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 120 cc to 100 kg
    MPS 2.3i 2.26 L
    (2261 cc)
    3.6% smaller 94 cc to 1 mpg 115 hp from 1 L 162 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 CD
    Precise engine size 2.18 L (2184 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 52 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 85 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 156 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0i
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 64 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6i
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1598 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 43 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 DISI
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 57 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 76 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 CD
    Precise engine size 2.18 L (2184 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 50 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 69 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 156 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 CD
    Precise engine size 1.56 L (1560 cc)
    Difference from world average 33.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 29 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 120 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle MPS 2.3i
    Precise engine size 2.26 L (2261 cc)
    Difference from world average 3.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 94 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 115 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 162 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 3 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.79 L (1789 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1560 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1999 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.56 L smaller (-557 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 358 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6593 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.37 L bigger (+1365 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 130 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    2006 Mazda 3 I Sedan (BK, facelift 2006) engine size

  • 1.6i —1598 cc (1598 L)
  • 2.0i —1999 cc (1999 L)
  • 1.6 CD —1560 cc (1560 L)
  • 2.0 CD —1998 cc (1998 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6i —15.2 cc/hp (20.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.0i —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 CD —14.3 cc/hp (19.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 CD —14 cc/hp (19 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6i —31.88 or 748 cc smaller
  • 2.0i —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • 1.6 CD —33.5 or 786 cc smaller
  • 2.0 CD —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6i 1.6 L
    (1598 cc)
    31.9% smaller 40 cc to 1 mpg 66 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    2.0i 2 L
    (1999 cc)
    14.8% smaller 67 cc to 1 mpg 75 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 CD 1.56 L
    (1560 cc)
    33.5% smaller 32 cc to 1 mpg 70 hp from 1 L 120 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 CD 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 51 cc to 1 mpg 72 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6i
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1598 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 40 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0i
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 67 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 CD
    Precise engine size 1.56 L (1560 cc)
    Difference from world average 33.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 32 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 70 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 120 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 CD
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 51 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 72 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 3 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.79 L (1794 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.3 L (1349 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.3 L (2261 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.55 L smaller (-552 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 13 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 359 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6588 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.37 L bigger (+1370 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 131 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    2006 Mazda 3 I Hatchback (BK, facelift 2006) engine size

  • 1.4i —1349 cc (1349 L)
  • 1.6i —1598 cc (1598 L)
  • 2.0i —1999 cc (1999 L)
  • MPS 2.3i —2261 cc (2261 L)
  • 1.6 CD —1560 cc (1560 L)
  • 2.0 CD —1998 cc (1998 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.4i —16.1 cc/hp (21.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.6i —15.2 cc/hp (20.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.0i —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)
  • MPS 2.3i —8.7 cc/hp (11.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 CD —17.3 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 CD —14 cc/hp (19 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.4i —42.5 or 997 cc smaller
  • 1.6i —31.88 or 748 cc smaller
  • 2.0i —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • MPS 2.3i —3.62 or 85 cc smaller
  • 1.6 CD —33.5 or 786 cc smaller
  • 2.0 CD —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.4i 1.35 L
    (1349 cc)
    42.5% smaller 39 cc to 1 mpg 62 hp from 1 L 112 cc to 100 kg
    1.6i 1.6 L
    (1598 cc)
    31.9% smaller 47 cc to 1 mpg 66 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    2.0i 2 L
    (1999 cc)
    14.8% smaller 67 cc to 1 mpg 75 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    MPS 2.3i 2.26 L
    (2261 cc)
    3.6% smaller 94 cc to 1 mpg 115 hp from 1 L 162 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 CD 1.56 L
    (1560 cc)
    33.5% smaller 31 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 120 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 CD 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 51 cc to 1 mpg 72 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.4i
    Precise engine size 1.35 L (1349 cc)
    Difference from world average 42.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 39 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 112 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6i
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1598 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 47 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0i
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 67 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle MPS 2.3i
    Precise engine size 2.26 L (2261 cc)
    Difference from world average 3.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 94 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 115 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 162 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 CD
    Precise engine size 1.56 L (1560 cc)
    Difference from world average 33.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 31 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 120 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 CD
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 51 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 72 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 3 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.63 L (1627 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.3 L (1349 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1999 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.72 L smaller (-719 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 15 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 325 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.8 L smaller (-6755 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.2 L bigger (+1203 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 107 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    2004 Mazda 3 I Hatchback (BK) engine size

  • 1.6i —1598 cc (1598 L)
  • 1.4i —1349 cc (1349 L)
  • 1.6 CD —1560 cc (1560 L)
  • 2.0i —1999 cc (1999 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6i —15.2 cc/hp (20.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.4i —16.1 cc/hp (21.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 CD —14.3 cc/hp (19.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.0i —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6i —31.88 or 748 cc smaller
  • 1.4i —42.5 or 997 cc smaller
  • 1.6 CD —33.5 or 786 cc smaller
  • 2.0i —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6i 1.6 L
    (1598 cc)
    31.9% smaller 48 cc to 1 mpg 66 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    1.4i 1.35 L
    (1349 cc)
    42.5% smaller 41 cc to 1 mpg 62 hp from 1 L 112 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 CD 1.56 L
    (1560 cc)
    33.5% smaller 33 cc to 1 mpg 70 hp from 1 L 120 cc to 100 kg
    2.0i 2 L
    (1999 cc)
    14.8% smaller 69 cc to 1 mpg 75 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6i
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1598 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 48 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.4i
    Precise engine size 1.35 L (1349 cc)
    Difference from world average 42.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 41 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 112 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 CD
    Precise engine size 1.56 L (1560 cc)
    Difference from world average 33.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 33 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 70 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 120 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0i
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 69 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 3 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.72 L (1719 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1560 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1999 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.63 L smaller (-627 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 344 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.7 L smaller (-6663 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.3 L bigger (+1295 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 111 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    2004 Mazda 3 I Sedan (BK) engine size

  • 1.6i —1598 cc (1598 L)
  • 1.6 CD —1560 cc (1560 L)
  • 2.0i —1999 cc (1999 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6i —15.2 cc/hp (20.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 CD —14.3 cc/hp (19.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.0i —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6i —31.88 or 748 cc smaller
  • 1.6 CD —33.5 or 786 cc smaller
  • 2.0i —14.79 or 347 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6i 1.6 L
    (1598 cc)
    31.9% smaller 48 cc to 1 mpg 66 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 CD 1.56 L
    (1560 cc)
    33.5% smaller 33 cc to 1 mpg 70 hp from 1 L 120 cc to 100 kg
    2.0i 2 L
    (1999 cc)
    14.8% smaller 69 cc to 1 mpg 75 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6i
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1598 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 48 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 CD
    Precise engine size 1.56 L (1560 cc)
    Difference from world average 33.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 33 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 70 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 120 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0i
    Precise engine size 2 L (1999 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 69 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg