cat_logo
HomeMazda

323

Mazda 323 Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Choose Generation

Average Engine Size Mazda 323

Mazda 323 2000

1998 323 S VI (BJ)

Quick notes on Mazda 323 engine size

    • Average size for generation: 1.75 L (1750 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 1.3 L (1324 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.6 L smaller (-596 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 18 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 350 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6632 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.33 L bigger (+1326 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 87 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

2000 Mazda 323

  • 2.0i 16V —1991 cc (1991 L)
  • 1.8i 16V —1840 cc (1840 L)
  • 1.5 i 16V —1498 cc (1498 L)
  • 1.6 i 16V —1598 cc (1598 L)
  • 1.3 i 16V —1324 cc (1324 L)
  • 2.0 D —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0 DiTD —1998 cc (1998 L)

    2000 Mazda 323 Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0i 16V —15.3 cc/hp (20.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.8i 16V —16.1 cc/hp (21.9 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 i 16V —17 cc/hp (23 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 i 16V —16.3 cc/hp (22.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.3 i 16V —18.1 cc/hp (24.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D —28.1 cc/hp (38.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 DiTD —22.2 cc/hp (30.3 cc/kW)

    2000 Mazda 323 Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0i 16V —15.13 or 355 cc smaller
  • 1.8i 16V —21.57 or 506 cc smaller
  • 1.5 i 16V —36.15 or 848 cc smaller
  • 1.6 i 16V —31.88 or 748 cc smaller
  • 1.3 i 16V —43.56 or 1022 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0 DiTD —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0i 16V 1.99 L
    (1991 cc)     		15.1% smaller 71 cc to 1 mpg 65 hp from 1 L 166 cc to 100 kg
    1.8i 16V 1.84 L
    (1840 cc)     		21.6% smaller - 62 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 i 16V 1.5 L
    (1498 cc)     		36.1% smaller - 59 hp from 1 L 136 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 i 16V 1.6 L
    (1598 cc)     		31.9% smaller 52 cc to 1 mpg 61 hp from 1 L 145 cc to 100 kg
    1.3 i 16V 1.32 L
    (1324 cc)     		43.6% smaller 41 cc to 1 mpg 55 hp from 1 L 120 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller - 36 hp from 1 L 182 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 DiTD 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller - 45 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1991 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 71 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 65 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 166 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.84 L (1840 cc)
    Difference from world average 21.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1498 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 59 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 136 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1598 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 52 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 145 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.3 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.32 L (1324 cc)
    Difference from world average 43.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 41 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 55 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 120 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 36 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 182 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 DiTD
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 45 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg

    Mazda 323 1998

    1998 323 F VI (BJ)

    Quick notes on Mazda 323 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.75 L (1750 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.3 L (1324 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.6 L smaller (-596 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 18 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 350 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6632 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.33 L bigger (+1326 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 87 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1998 Mazda 323

  • Sport 2.0i 16V —1991 cc (1991 L)
  • 1.3 i 16V —1324 cc (1324 L)
  • 1.6 i 16V —1598 cc (1598 L)
  • 1.5 i 16V —1498 cc (1498 L)
  • 2.0 DiTD —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 1.8 i 16V —1840 cc (1840 L)
  • 2.0 D —1998 cc (1998 L)

    1998 Mazda 323 Engine size to power ratio

  • Sport 2.0i 16V —15.3 cc/hp (20.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.3 i 16V —18.1 cc/hp (24.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 i 16V —16.3 cc/hp (22.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 i 16V —17 cc/hp (23 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 DiTD —22.2 cc/hp (30.3 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 i 16V —16.1 cc/hp (21.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D —28.1 cc/hp (38.4 cc/kW)

    1998 Mazda 323 Difference from world average engine size

  • Sport 2.0i 16V —15.13 or 355 cc smaller
  • 1.3 i 16V —43.56 or 1022 cc smaller
  • 1.6 i 16V —31.88 or 748 cc smaller
  • 1.5 i 16V —36.15 or 848 cc smaller
  • 2.0 DiTD —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 1.8 i 16V —21.57 or 506 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    Sport 2.0i 16V 1.99 L
    (1991 cc)     		15.1% smaller 71 cc to 1 mpg 65 hp from 1 L 166 cc to 100 kg
    1.3 i 16V 1.32 L
    (1324 cc)     		43.6% smaller 41 cc to 1 mpg 55 hp from 1 L 120 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 i 16V 1.6 L
    (1598 cc)     		31.9% smaller 50 cc to 1 mpg 61 hp from 1 L 145 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 i 16V 1.5 L
    (1498 cc)     		36.1% smaller - 59 hp from 1 L 136 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 DiTD 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller - 45 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 i 16V 1.84 L
    (1840 cc)     		21.6% smaller - 62 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller - 36 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle Sport 2.0i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1991 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 71 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 65 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 166 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.3 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.32 L (1324 cc)
    Difference from world average 43.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 41 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 55 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 120 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1598 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 50 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 145 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1498 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 59 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 136 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 DiTD
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 45 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.84 L (1840 cc)
    Difference from world average 21.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 36 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg

    Mazda 323 1998

    1998 323 P VI (BJ)

    Quick notes on Mazda 323 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.6 L (1604 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.3 L (1324 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.74 L smaller (-742 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 21 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 321 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.8 L smaller (-6778 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.18 L bigger (+1180 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 77 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1998 Mazda 323

  • 1.3 i 16V —1324 cc (1324 L)
  • 2.0 D —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 1.5 i 16V —1489 cc (1489 L)

    1998 Mazda 323 Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.3 i 16V —18.1 cc/hp (24.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D —28.1 cc/hp (38.4 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 i 16V —16.9 cc/hp (22.9 cc/kW)

    1998 Mazda 323 Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.3 i 16V —43.56 or 1022 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 1.5 i 16V —36.53 or 857 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.3 i 16V 1.32 L
    (1324 cc)     		43.6% smaller - 55 hp from 1 L 132 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller - 36 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 i 16V 1.49 L
    (1489 cc)     		36.5% smaller - 59 hp from 1 L 149 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.3 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.32 L (1324 cc)
    Difference from world average 43.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 55 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 132 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 36 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.49 L (1489 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 59 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 149 cc to 100 kg

    Mazda 323 1996

    1994 323 S V (BA)

    Quick notes on Mazda 323 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.67 L (1667 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.3 L (1324 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.68 L smaller (-679 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 19 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 333 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.7 L smaller (-6715 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.24 L bigger (+1243 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 83 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1996 Mazda 323

  • 1.3 i 16V —1324 cc (1324 L)
  • 1.7 TD —1686 cc (1686 L)
  • 1.5i 16V —1489 cc (1489 L)
  • 1.8i 16V —1840 cc (1840 L)
  • 2.0 D —1998 cc (1998 L)

    1996 Mazda 323 Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.3 i 16V —18.1 cc/hp (24.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.7 TD —20.6 cc/hp (28.1 cc/kW)
  • 1.5i 16V —16.9 cc/hp (22.9 cc/kW)
  • 1.8i 16V —16.1 cc/hp (21.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D —28.1 cc/hp (38.4 cc/kW)

    1996 Mazda 323 Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.3 i 16V —43.56 or 1022 cc smaller
  • 1.7 TD —28.13 or 660 cc smaller
  • 1.5i 16V —36.53 or 857 cc smaller
  • 1.8i 16V —21.57 or 506 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.3 i 16V 1.32 L
    (1324 cc)     		43.6% smaller 41 cc to 1 mpg 55 hp from 1 L 132 cc to 100 kg
    1.7 TD 1.69 L
    (1686 cc)     		28.1% smaller 46 cc to 1 mpg 49 hp from 1 L 141 cc to 100 kg
    1.5i 16V 1.49 L
    (1489 cc)     		36.5% smaller 45 cc to 1 mpg 59 hp from 1 L 135 cc to 100 kg
    1.8i 16V 1.84 L
    (1840 cc)     		21.6% smaller 61 cc to 1 mpg 62 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller - 36 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.3 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.32 L (1324 cc)
    Difference from world average 43.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 41 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 55 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 132 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.7 TD
    Precise engine size 1.69 L (1686 cc)
    Difference from world average 28.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 46 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 49 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 141 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.49 L (1489 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 45 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 59 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 135 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.84 L (1840 cc)
    Difference from world average 21.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 61 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 36 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg

    Mazda 323 1994

    1994 323 F V (BA)

    Quick notes on Mazda 323 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.78 L (1775 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1489 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1995 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.57 L smaller (-571 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 15 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 355 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6607 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.35 L bigger (+1351 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 88 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1994 Mazda 323

  • 1.5 i 16V —1489 cc (1489 L)
  • 1.8i 16V —1840 cc (1840 L)
  • 2.0i V6 24V —1995 cc (1995 L)

    1994 Mazda 323 Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.5 i 16V —16.9 cc/hp (22.9 cc/kW)
  • 1.8i 16V —16.1 cc/hp (21.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0i V6 24V —13.9 cc/hp (18.8 cc/kW)

    1994 Mazda 323 Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.5 i 16V —36.53 or 857 cc smaller
  • 1.8i 16V —21.57 or 506 cc smaller
  • 2.0i V6 24V —14.96 or 351 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.5 i 16V 1.49 L
    (1489 cc)     		36.5% smaller 45 cc to 1 mpg 59 hp from 1 L 135 cc to 100 kg
    1.8i 16V 1.84 L
    (1840 cc)     		21.6% smaller 63 cc to 1 mpg 62 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    2.0i V6 24V 2 L
    (1995 cc)     		15% smaller 77 cc to 1 mpg 72 hp from 1 L 166 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.49 L (1489 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 45 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 59 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 135 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.84 L (1840 cc)
    Difference from world average 21.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 63 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0i V6 24V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1995 cc)
    Difference from world average 15 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 77 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 72 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 166 cc to 100 kg

    Mazda 323 1994

    1994 323 C V (BA)

    Quick notes on Mazda 323 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.55 L (1551 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.3 L (1324 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1840 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.8 L smaller (-795 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 310 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.8 L smaller (-6831 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.13 L bigger (+1127 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 85 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1994 Mazda 323

  • 1.3 i 16V —1324 cc (1324 L)
  • 1.5 i 16V —1489 cc (1489 L)
  • 1.8i 16V —1840 cc (1840 L)

    1994 Mazda 323 Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.3 i 16V —18.1 cc/hp (24.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 i 16V —17.1 cc/hp (23.3 cc/kW)
  • 1.8i 16V —16 cc/hp (21.6 cc/kW)

    1994 Mazda 323 Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.3 i 16V —43.56 or 1022 cc smaller
  • 1.5 i 16V —36.53 or 857 cc smaller
  • 1.8i 16V —21.57 or 506 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.3 i 16V 1.32 L
    (1324 cc)     		43.6% smaller 41 cc to 1 mpg 55 hp from 1 L 132 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 i 16V 1.49 L
    (1489 cc)     		36.5% smaller 45 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 135 cc to 100 kg
    1.8i 16V 1.84 L
    (1840 cc)     		21.6% smaller 63 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.3 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.32 L (1324 cc)
    Difference from world average 43.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 41 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 55 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 132 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.49 L (1489 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 45 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 135 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.84 L (1840 cc)
    Difference from world average 21.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 63 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg

    Mazda 323 1991

    1989 323 S IV (BG)

    Quick notes on Mazda 323 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.6 L (1596 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1596 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1596 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.75 L smaller (-750 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 18 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 399 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.8 L smaller (-6786 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.17 L bigger (+1172 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 83 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1991 Mazda 323

  • 1.6 16V —1596 cc (1596 L)

    1991 Mazda 323 Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6 16V —18.1 cc/hp (24.6 cc/kW)

    1991 Mazda 323 Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6 16V —31.97 or 750 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6 16V 1.6 L
    (1596 cc)     		32% smaller 41 cc to 1 mpg 55 hp from 1 L 177 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 16V
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1596 cc)
    Difference from world average 32 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 41 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 55 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 177 cc to 100 kg

    Mazda 323 1989

    1989 323 F IV (BG)

    Quick notes on Mazda 323 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.74 L (1743 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1597 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1840 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.6 L smaller (-603 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 349 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6639 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.32 L bigger (+1319 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 83 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1989 Mazda 323

  • 1.6 16V —1598 cc (1598 L)
  • 1.8 16V —1840 cc (1840 L)
  • 1.8 16V GT —1840 cc (1840 L)
  • 1.8 4WD —1840 cc (1840 L)
  • 1.6 —1597 cc (1597 L)

    1989 Mazda 323 Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6 16V —18.2 cc/hp (24.6 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 16V —17.9 cc/hp (24.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 16V GT —14.4 cc/hp (19.6 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 4WD —17.9 cc/hp (24.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 —19 cc/hp (25.8 cc/kW)

    1989 Mazda 323 Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6 16V —31.88 or 748 cc smaller
  • 1.8 16V —21.57 or 506 cc smaller
  • 1.8 16V GT —21.57 or 506 cc smaller
  • 1.8 4WD —21.57 or 506 cc smaller
  • 1.6 —31.93 or 749 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6 16V 1.6 L
    (1598 cc)     		31.9% smaller 55 cc to 1 mpg 55 hp from 1 L 160 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 16V 1.84 L
    (1840 cc)     		21.6% smaller - 56 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 16V GT 1.84 L
    (1840 cc)     		21.6% smaller - 70 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 4WD 1.84 L
    (1840 cc)     		21.6% smaller 59 cc to 1 mpg 56 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 1.6 L
    (1597 cc)     		31.9% smaller 48 cc to 1 mpg 53 hp from 1 L 160 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 16V
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1598 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 55 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 55 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 160 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 16V
    Precise engine size 1.84 L (1840 cc)
    Difference from world average 21.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 56 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 16V GT
    Precise engine size 1.84 L (1840 cc)
    Difference from world average 21.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 70 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 4WD
    Precise engine size 1.84 L (1840 cc)
    Difference from world average 21.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 59 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 56 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1597 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 48 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 53 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 160 cc to 100 kg

    Mazda 323 1989

    1989 323 C IV (BG)

    Quick notes on Mazda 323 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.46 L (1461 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.3 L (1324 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1598 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.89 L smaller (-885 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 18 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 292 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.9 L smaller (-6921 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.04 L bigger (+1037 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 99 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1989 Mazda 323

  • 1.3 16V —1324 cc (1324 L)
  • 1.6 —1598 cc (1598 L)

    1989 Mazda 323 Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.3 16V —18.1 cc/hp (24.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 —19 cc/hp (25.8 cc/kW)

    1989 Mazda 323 Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.3 16V —43.56 or 1022 cc smaller
  • 1.6 —31.88 or 748 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.3 16V 1.32 L
    (1324 cc)     		43.6% smaller 36 cc to 1 mpg 55 hp from 1 L 132 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 1.6 L
    (1598 cc)     		31.9% smaller 57 cc to 1 mpg 53 hp from 1 L 160 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.3 16V
    Precise engine size 1.32 L (1324 cc)
    Difference from world average 43.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 36 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 55 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 132 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1598 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 57 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 53 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 160 cc to 100 kg

    Mazda 323 1985

    1985 323 III (BF)

    Quick notes on Mazda 323 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.49 L (1490 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1490 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1490 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.86 L smaller (-856 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 20 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 298 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.9 L smaller (-6892 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.07 L bigger (+1066 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 97 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1985 Mazda 323

  • 1.5 —1490 cc (1490 L)

    1985 Mazda 323 Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.5 —19.9 cc/hp (27.1 cc/kW)

    1985 Mazda 323 Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.5 —36.49 or 856 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.5 1.49 L
    (1490 cc)     		36.5% smaller 51 cc to 1 mpg 50 hp from 1 L -
    Vehicle 1.5
    Precise engine size 1.49 L (1490 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 51 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 50 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -