Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 CD |
1.56 L (1560 cc) |
33.5% smaller | 35 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 CD |
Precise engine size | 1.56 L (1560 cc) |
Difference from world average | 33.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 35 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CD |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 55 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 58 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CD |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 58 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CD |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 55 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CD |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |