2018 6 III Sedan (GJ, facelift 2018)
2018 6 III Sport Combi (GJ, facelift 2018)
2015 6 III Sedan (GJ, facelift 2015)
2015 6 III Sport Combi (GJ, facelift 2015)
2012 6 III Sedan (GJ)
2012 6 III Sport Combi (GJ)
2010 6 TAKUMI
2008 6 II Sedan (GH)
2008 6 II Hatchback (GH)
2008 6 II Combi (GH)
2005 6 I Sedan (Typ GG/GY/GG1 facelift 2005)
2005 6 I Combi (Typ GG/GY/GG1 facelift 2005)
2005 6 I Hatchback (Typ GG/GY/GG1 facelift 2005)
2002 6 I Combi (Typ GG/GY/GG1)
2002 6 I Sedan (Typ GG/GY/GG1)
2002 6 I Hatchback (Typ GG/GY/GG1)
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 SKYACTIV-G |
2.49 L (2488 cc) |
6.1% bigger | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 SKYACTIV-D |
2.19 L (2191 cc) |
6.6% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 84 hp from 1 L | 137 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 SKYACTIV-G |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 SKYACTIV-G |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2488 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 SKYACTIV-D |
Precise engine size | 2.19 L (2191 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 84 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 137 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 SKYACTIV-G |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 SKYACTIV-D |
2.19 L (2191 cc) |
6.6% smaller | 45 cc to 1 mpg | 84 hp from 1 L | 137 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 SKYACTIV-G |
2.49 L (2488 cc) |
6.1% bigger | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 SKYACTIV-G |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 SKYACTIV-D |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.19 L (2191 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 45 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 84 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 137 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 SKYACTIV-G |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2488 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 SKYACTIV-G |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 SKYACTIV-D |
2.19 L (2191 cc) |
6.6% smaller | 45 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 146 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 SKYACTIV-G |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 SKYACTIV-G |
2.49 L (2488 cc) |
6.1% bigger | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 77 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 SKYACTIV-D |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.19 L (2191 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 45 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 SKYACTIV-G |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 SKYACTIV-G |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2488 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 SKYACTIV-G |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 SKYACTIV-G |
2.49 L (2488 cc) |
6.1% bigger | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 77 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 SKYACTIV-D |
2.19 L (2191 cc) |
6.6% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 SKYACTIV-G |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 SKYACTIV-G |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2488 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 SKYACTIV-D |
Precise engine size | 2.19 L (2191 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 SKYACTIV-G |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 SKYACTIV-G |
2.49 L (2488 cc) |
6.1% bigger | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 77 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 SKYACTIV-D |
2.18 L (2184 cc) |
6.9% smaller | 45 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 SKYACTIV-G |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 SKYACTIV-G |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2488 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 SKYACTIV-D |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2184 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 45 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 SKYACTIV-G |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 SKYACTIV-G |
2.49 L (2488 cc) |
6.1% bigger | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 77 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 SKYACTIV-D |
2.18 L (2184 cc) |
6.9% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 SKYACTIV-G |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 SKYACTIV-G |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2488 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 SKYACTIV-D |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2184 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 CD |
2.18 L (2184 cc) |
6.9% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 59 hp from 1 L | 146 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 CD |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2184 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i Activematic |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 CD |
2.18 L (2184 cc) |
6.9% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 146 cc to 100 kg |
2.5i |
2.49 L (2488 cc) |
6.1% bigger | 86 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i Activematic |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 CD |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2184 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2488 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 86 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i Activematic |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.5i |
2.49 L (2488 cc) |
6.1% bigger | 86 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 CD |
2.18 L (2184 cc) |
6.9% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 137 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i Activematic |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2488 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 86 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 CD |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2184 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 137 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.5i |
2.49 L (2488 cc) |
6.1% bigger | 86 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i Activematic |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 CD |
2.18 L (2184 cc) |
6.9% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 137 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2488 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 86 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i Activematic |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 CD |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2184 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 137 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
MPS 2.3 |
2.26 L (2261 cc) |
3.6% smaller | 98 cc to 1 mpg | 115 hp from 1 L | 141 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 58 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
2.3 |
2.26 L (2261 cc) |
3.6% smaller | 84 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 162 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CD |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 72 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | MPS 2.3 |
Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2261 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 98 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 115 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 141 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 58 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2261 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 84 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 162 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CD |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CD |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.3 |
2.26 L (2261 cc) |
3.6% smaller | 84 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 162 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CD |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2261 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 84 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 162 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CD |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.3 |
2.26 L (2261 cc) |
3.6% smaller | 84 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 162 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CD |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2261 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 84 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 162 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 |
2.26 L (2261 cc) |
3.6% smaller | 103 cc to 1 mpg | 72 hp from 1 L | 151 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CD |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2261 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 103 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 151 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CD |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 |
2.26 L (2261 cc) |
3.6% smaller | 87 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 174 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CD |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2261 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 87 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 174 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CD |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.3 |
2.26 L (2261 cc) |
3.6% smaller | 87 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 162 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 CD |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3 |
Precise engine size | 2.26 L (2261 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 87 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 162 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CD |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |