Mazda 626 Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Average Engine Size Mazda 626

Quick notes on Mazda 626 engine size

    • Average size for generation: 2.08 L (2082 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1840 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2497 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.26 L smaller (-264 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 416 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6300 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.66 L bigger (+1658 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 92 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

1997 Mazda 626 V (GF) engine size

  • 1.9 —1840 cc (1840 L)
  • 2.0 —1991 cc (1991 L)
  • 2.0 Turbo DI —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.5 V6 —2497 cc (2497 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.9 —20.4 cc/hp (27.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —14.6 cc/hp (19.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 Turbo DI —19.8 cc/hp (27 cc/kW)
  • 2.5 V6 —15 cc/hp (20.3 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.9 —21.57 or 506 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —15.13 or 355 cc smaller
  • 2.0 Turbo DI —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.5 V6 —6.44 or 151 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.9 1.84 L
    (1840 cc)
    21.6% smaller - 49 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 1.99 L
    (1991 cc)
    15.1% smaller - 68 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 Turbo DI 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 46 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.5 V6 2.5 L
    (2497 cc)
    6.4% bigger - 67 hp from 1 L 178 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9
    Precise engine size 1.84 L (1840 cc)
    Difference from world average 21.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 49 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1991 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 68 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo DI
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 46 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 V6
    Precise engine size 2.5 L (2497 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.4 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 67 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 178 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 626 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.96 L (1955 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1840 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.39 L smaller (-391 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 18 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 391 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6427 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.53 L bigger (+1531 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 92 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1998 Mazda 626 V Station Wagon (GF,GW) engine size

  • 1.9 —1840 cc (1840 L)
  • 2.0 —1991 cc (1991 L)
  • 2.0 Turbo DI —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0 H.P. —1991 cc (1991 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.9 —20.4 cc/hp (27.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —17.2 cc/hp (23.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 Turbo DI —19.8 cc/hp (27 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 H.P. —14.6 cc/hp (19.9 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.9 —21.57 or 506 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —15.13 or 355 cc smaller
  • 2.0 Turbo DI —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0 H.P. —15.13 or 355 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.9 1.84 L
    (1840 cc)
    21.6% smaller - 49 hp from 1 L 142 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 1.99 L
    (1991 cc)
    15.1% smaller - 58 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 Turbo DI 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 46 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 H.P. 1.99 L
    (1991 cc)
    15.1% smaller - 68 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9
    Precise engine size 1.84 L (1840 cc)
    Difference from world average 21.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 49 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 142 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1991 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo DI
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 46 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 H.P.
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1991 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 68 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 626 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.96 L (1955 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1840 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.39 L smaller (-391 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 18 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 391 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6427 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.53 L bigger (+1531 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 93 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1997 Mazda 626 V Hatchback (GF) engine size

  • 1.9 —1840 cc (1840 L)
  • 2.0 —1991 cc (1991 L)
  • 2.0 —1991 cc (1991 L)
  • 2.0 Turbo DI —1998 cc (1998 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.9 —20.4 cc/hp (27.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —14.6 cc/hp (19.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —17.3 cc/hp (23.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 Turbo DI —19.8 cc/hp (27 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.9 —21.57 or 506 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —15.13 or 355 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —15.13 or 355 cc smaller
  • 2.0 Turbo DI —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.9 1.84 L
    (1840 cc)
    21.6% smaller - 49 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 1.99 L
    (1991 cc)
    15.1% smaller - 68 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 1.99 L
    (1991 cc)
    15.1% smaller - 58 hp from 1 L 166 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 Turbo DI 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 46 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9
    Precise engine size 1.84 L (1840 cc)
    Difference from world average 21.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 49 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1991 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 68 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1991 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 166 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 Turbo DI
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 46 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 626 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.08 L (2082 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1840 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2497 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.26 L smaller (-264 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 19 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 416 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6300 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.66 L bigger (+1658 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 89 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1992 Mazda 626 IV Hatchback (GE) engine size

  • 1.8 —1840 cc (1840 L)
  • 2.0i —1991 cc (1991 L)
  • 2.0 D GLX Comprex —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.5 24V —2497 cc (2497 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.8 —20.4 cc/hp (27.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0i —17.3 cc/hp (23.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D GLX Comprex —26.6 cc/hp (36.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.5 24V —15.1 cc/hp (20.6 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.8 —21.57 or 506 cc smaller
  • 2.0i —15.13 or 355 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D GLX Comprex —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.5 24V —6.44 or 151 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.8 1.84 L
    (1840 cc)
    21.6% smaller - 49 hp from 1 L -
    2.0i 1.99 L
    (1991 cc)
    15.1% smaller 66 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 166 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D GLX Comprex 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 57 cc to 1 mpg 38 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.5 24V 2.5 L
    (2497 cc)
    6.4% bigger 100 cc to 1 mpg 66 hp from 1 L 192 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.84 L (1840 cc)
    Difference from world average 21.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 49 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0i
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1991 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 66 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 166 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D GLX Comprex
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 57 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 38 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 24V
    Precise engine size 2.5 L (2497 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.4 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 100 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 66 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 192 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 626 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.06 L (2060 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.2 L (2184 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.29 L smaller (-286 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 22 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 412 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6322 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.64 L bigger (+1636 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 81 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1992 Mazda 626 IV Station Wagon engine size

  • 2.0 D —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0 i —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.2i —2184 cc (2184 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 D —26.6 cc/hp (36.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 i —22.2 cc/hp (30.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.2i —19 cc/hp (25.7 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 D —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0 i —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.2i —6.91 or 162 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 D 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 57 cc to 1 mpg 38 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 i 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 71 cc to 1 mpg 45 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    2.2i 2.18 L
    (2184 cc)
    6.9% smaller 78 cc to 1 mpg 53 hp from 1 L 182 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 57 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 38 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 i
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 71 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 45 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2i
    Precise engine size 2.18 L (2184 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 78 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 53 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 182 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 626 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.94 L (1943 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1840 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.4 L smaller (-403 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 20 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 389 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6439 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.52 L bigger (+1519 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 85 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1992 Mazda 626 IV (GE) engine size

  • 1.8 i —1840 cc (1840 L)
  • 2.0 D GLX Comprex —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0i —1991 cc (1991 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.8 i —17.5 cc/hp (23.9 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D GLX Comprex —26.6 cc/hp (36.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.0i —17.3 cc/hp (23.4 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.8 i —21.57 or 506 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D GLX Comprex —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0i —15.13 or 355 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.8 i 1.84 L
    (1840 cc)
    21.6% smaller 66 cc to 1 mpg 57 hp from 1 L 153 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D GLX Comprex 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 57 cc to 1 mpg 38 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.0i 1.99 L
    (1991 cc)
    15.1% smaller 69 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 166 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 i
    Precise engine size 1.84 L (1840 cc)
    Difference from world average 21.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 66 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 153 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D GLX Comprex
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 57 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 38 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0i
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1991 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 69 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 166 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda 626 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.35 L smaller (-348 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 19 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 400 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6384 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.57 L bigger (+1574 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 85 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1987 Mazda 626 III Coupe (GD) engine size

  • 2.0 12V —1998 cc (1998 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 12V —18.7 cc/hp (25.3 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 12V —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 12V 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller - 54 hp from 1 L -
    Vehicle 2.0 12V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 54 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -

    Quick notes on Mazda 626 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2 L (1999 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (2000 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.35 L smaller (-347 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 24 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 400 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6383 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.58 L bigger (+1575 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 85 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1987 Mazda 626 III Hatchback (GD) engine size

  • 2.0 12V —2000 cc (2000 L)
  • 2.0 D —1998 cc (1998 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 12V —18.7 cc/hp (25.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D —33.3 cc/hp (45.4 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 12V —14.75 or 346 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 12V 2 L
    (2000 cc)
    14.7% smaller - 54 hp from 1 L -
    2.0 D 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 51 cc to 1 mpg 30 hp from 1 L -
    Vehicle 2.0 12V
    Precise engine size 2 L (2000 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.7 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 54 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 51 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 30 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -

    Quick notes on Mazda 626 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.35 L smaller (-348 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 22 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 400 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6384 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.57 L bigger (+1574 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 75 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1987 Mazda 626 III (GD) engine size

  • 2.0 —1998 cc (1998 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 —22.2 cc/hp (30.3 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller - 45 hp from 1 L -
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 45 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -

    Quick notes on Mazda 626 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.35 L smaller (-348 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 20 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 500 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6384 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.57 L bigger (+1574 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 78 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1982 Mazda 626 II (GC) engine size

  • 2.0 —1998 cc (1998 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 —19.8 cc/hp (27 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 2 L
    (1998 cc)
    14.8% smaller 74 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 74 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg