2018 BT-50 Freestyle Cab II (facelift 2018)
2018 BT-50 Dual Cab II (facelift 2018)
2015 BT-50 Freestyle Cab II (facelift 2015)
2015 BT-50 Dual Cab II (facelift 2015)
2012 BT-50 Freestyle Cab II
2012 BT-50 Dual Cab II
2008 BT-50 Double Cab I (facelift 2008)
2008 BT-50 Freestyle Cab I (facelift 2008)
2006 BT-50 Double Cab I
2006 BT-50 Freestyle Cab I
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR 3.2 |
3.2 L (3198 cc) |
36.3% bigger | 133 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 133 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR 3.2 |
3.2 L (3198 cc) |
36.3% bigger | 133 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
3.2 |
3.2 L (3198 cc) |
36.3% bigger | 133 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 133 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 133 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR 3.2 |
3.2 L (3198 cc) |
36.3% bigger | 123 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 123 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 |
3.2 L (3198 cc) |
36.3% bigger | 123 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 160 cc to 100 kg |
XTR 3.2 |
3.2 L (3198 cc) |
36.3% bigger | 123 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 123 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 123 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
XTR 3.2 |
3.2 L (3198 cc) |
36.3% bigger | 123 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 123 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.2 |
3.2 L (3198 cc) |
36.3% bigger | 123 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 160 cc to 100 kg |
XTR 3.2 |
3.2 L (3198 cc) |
36.3% bigger | 123 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.2 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 123 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | XTR 3.2 |
Precise engine size | 3.2 L (3198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 123 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD |
2.5 L (2499 cc) |
6.5% bigger | 100 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2499 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 100 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD |
2.5 L (2499 cc) |
6.5% bigger | 100 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2499 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 100 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD |
2.5 L (2499 cc) |
6.5% bigger | 96 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2499 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 96 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD |
2.5 L (2499 cc) |
6.5% bigger | 96 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2499 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 96 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |