Mazda BT-50 Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Average Engine Size Mazda BT-50

Quick notes on Mazda BT-50 engine size

    • Average size for generation: 3.2 L (3198 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 3.2 L (3198 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 3.2 L (3198 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.85 L bigger (+852 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 16 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 800 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 5.2 L smaller (-5184 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 2.77 L bigger (+2774 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 147 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 8 / 10

2018 Mazda BT-50 Freestyle Cab II (facelift 2018) engine size

  • XTR 3.2 —3198 cc (3198 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • XTR 3.2 —16 cc/hp (21.8 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • XTR 3.2 —36.32 or 852 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    XTR 3.2 3.2 L
    (3198 cc)
    36.3% bigger 133 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 160 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle XTR 3.2
    Precise engine size 3.2 L (3198 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 133 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 160 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda BT-50 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 3.2 L (3198 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 3.2 L (3198 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 3.2 L (3198 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.85 L bigger (+852 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 16 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 640 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 5.2 L smaller (-5184 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 2.77 L bigger (+2774 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 147 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 8 / 10

    2018 Mazda BT-50 Dual Cab II (facelift 2018) engine size

  • XTR 3.2 —3198 cc (3198 L)
  • 3.2 —3198 cc (3198 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • XTR 3.2 —16 cc/hp (21.8 cc/kW)
  • 3.2 —16 cc/hp (21.8 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • XTR 3.2 —36.32 or 852 cc bigger
  • 3.2 —36.32 or 852 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    XTR 3.2 3.2 L
    (3198 cc)
    36.3% bigger 133 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 152 cc to 100 kg
    3.2 3.2 L
    (3198 cc)
    36.3% bigger 133 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 160 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle XTR 3.2
    Precise engine size 3.2 L (3198 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 133 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 152 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 3.2
    Precise engine size 3.2 L (3198 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 133 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 160 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda BT-50 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 3.2 L (3198 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 3.2 L (3198 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 3.2 L (3198 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.85 L bigger (+852 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 16 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 800 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 5.2 L smaller (-5184 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 2.77 L bigger (+2774 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 147 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 8 / 10

    2015 Mazda BT-50 Freestyle Cab II (facelift 2015) engine size

  • XTR 3.2 —3198 cc (3198 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • XTR 3.2 —16 cc/hp (21.8 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • XTR 3.2 —36.32 or 852 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    XTR 3.2 3.2 L
    (3198 cc)
    36.3% bigger 123 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 152 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle XTR 3.2
    Precise engine size 3.2 L (3198 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 123 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 152 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda BT-50 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 3.2 L (3198 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 3.2 L (3198 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 3.2 L (3198 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.85 L bigger (+852 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 16 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 640 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 5.2 L smaller (-5184 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 2.77 L bigger (+2774 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 147 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 8 / 10

    2015 Mazda BT-50 Dual Cab II (facelift 2015) engine size

  • 3.2 —3198 cc (3198 L)
  • XTR 3.2 —3198 cc (3198 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 3.2 —16 cc/hp (21.8 cc/kW)
  • XTR 3.2 —16 cc/hp (21.8 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 3.2 —36.32 or 852 cc bigger
  • XTR 3.2 —36.32 or 852 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    3.2 3.2 L
    (3198 cc)
    36.3% bigger 123 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 160 cc to 100 kg
    XTR 3.2 3.2 L
    (3198 cc)
    36.3% bigger 123 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 152 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 3.2
    Precise engine size 3.2 L (3198 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 123 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 160 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle XTR 3.2
    Precise engine size 3.2 L (3198 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 123 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 152 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda BT-50 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 3.2 L (3198 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 3.2 L (3198 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 3.2 L (3198 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.85 L bigger (+852 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 16 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 800 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 5.2 L smaller (-5184 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 2.77 L bigger (+2774 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 147 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 8 / 10

    2012 Mazda BT-50 Freestyle Cab II engine size

  • XTR 3.2 —3198 cc (3198 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • XTR 3.2 —16 cc/hp (21.8 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • XTR 3.2 —36.32 or 852 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    XTR 3.2 3.2 L
    (3198 cc)
    36.3% bigger 123 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 152 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle XTR 3.2
    Precise engine size 3.2 L (3198 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 123 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 152 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda BT-50 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 3.2 L (3198 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 3.2 L (3198 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 3.2 L (3198 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.85 L bigger (+852 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 16 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 640 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 5.2 L smaller (-5184 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 2.77 L bigger (+2774 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 147 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 8 / 10

    2012 Mazda BT-50 Dual Cab II engine size

  • 3.2 —3198 cc (3198 L)
  • XTR 3.2 —3198 cc (3198 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 3.2 —16 cc/hp (21.8 cc/kW)
  • XTR 3.2 —16 cc/hp (21.8 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 3.2 —36.32 or 852 cc bigger
  • XTR 3.2 —36.32 or 852 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    3.2 3.2 L
    (3198 cc)
    36.3% bigger 123 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 160 cc to 100 kg
    XTR 3.2 3.2 L
    (3198 cc)
    36.3% bigger 123 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 152 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 3.2
    Precise engine size 3.2 L (3198 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 123 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 160 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle XTR 3.2
    Precise engine size 3.2 L (3198 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.3 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 123 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 152 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda BT-50 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.5 L (2499 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2499 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2499 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.15 L bigger (+153 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 500 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 5.9 L smaller (-5883 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 2.08 L bigger (+2075 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 132 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2008 Mazda BT-50 Double Cab I (facelift 2008) engine size

  • 2.5 TD —2499 cc (2499 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.5 TD —17.5 cc/hp (23.8 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.5 TD —6.52 or 153 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.5 TD 2.5 L
    (2499 cc)
    6.5% bigger 100 cc to 1 mpg 57 hp from 1 L 139 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 TD
    Precise engine size 2.5 L (2499 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.5 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 100 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 139 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda BT-50 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.5 L (2499 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2499 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2499 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.15 L bigger (+153 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 625 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 5.9 L smaller (-5883 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 2.08 L bigger (+2075 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 132 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2008 Mazda BT-50 Freestyle Cab I (facelift 2008) engine size

  • 2.5 TD —2499 cc (2499 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.5 TD —17.5 cc/hp (23.8 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.5 TD —6.52 or 153 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.5 TD 2.5 L
    (2499 cc)
    6.5% bigger 100 cc to 1 mpg 57 hp from 1 L 139 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 TD
    Precise engine size 2.5 L (2499 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.5 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 100 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 139 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda BT-50 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.5 L (2499 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2499 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2499 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.15 L bigger (+153 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 500 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 5.9 L smaller (-5883 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 2.08 L bigger (+2075 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 132 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2006 Mazda BT-50 Double Cab I engine size

  • 2.5 TD —2499 cc (2499 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.5 TD —17.5 cc/hp (23.8 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.5 TD —6.52 or 153 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.5 TD 2.5 L
    (2499 cc)
    6.5% bigger 96 cc to 1 mpg 57 hp from 1 L 139 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 TD
    Precise engine size 2.5 L (2499 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.5 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 96 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 139 cc to 100 kg

    Quick notes on Mazda BT-50 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.5 L (2499 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2499 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2499 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.15 L bigger (+153 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 625 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 5.9 L smaller (-5883 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 2.08 L bigger (+2075 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 132 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2006 Mazda BT-50 Freestyle Cab I engine size

  • 2.5 TD —2499 cc (2499 L)

    Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.5 TD —17.5 cc/hp (23.8 cc/kW)

    Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.5 TD —6.52 or 153 cc bigger
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.5 TD 2.5 L
    (2499 cc)
    6.5% bigger 96 cc to 1 mpg 57 hp from 1 L 139 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 TD
    Precise engine size 2.5 L (2499 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.5 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 96 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 139 cc to 100 kg