Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i |
1.84 L (1840 cc) |
21.6% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | - | 69 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 41 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 85 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 i |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | - | 80 hp from 1 L | 192 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.84 L (1840 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 41 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 i |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 192 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
1.6 L (1597 cc) |
31.9% smaller | - | 46 hp from 1 L | - |
1.8i |
1.84 L (1840 cc) |
21.6% smaller | - | 62 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 16V |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | - | 64 hp from 1 L | - |
1.8 i |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | - | 69 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 41 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0i |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 73 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1597 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 46 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Precise engine size | 1.84 L (1840 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 41 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 16V |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 73 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 16V |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 41 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 41 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
1.84 L (1840 cc) |
21.6% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 73 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.84 L (1840 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |