Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 SkyActiv-G |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 91 hp from 1 L | 182 cc to 100 kg |
1.5 SkyActiv-G |
1.5 L (1496 cc) |
36.2% smaller | 38 cc to 1 mpg | 87 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 SkyActiv-G |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 91 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 SkyActiv-G |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1496 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 38 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 87 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 SkyActiv-G |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 91 hp from 1 L | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 SkyActiv-G |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 91 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 SkyActiv G |
1.5 L (1496 cc) |
36.2% smaller | 38 cc to 1 mpg | 87 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 SkyActiv G |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 SkyActiv G |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1496 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 38 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 87 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 SkyActiv G |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 MZR |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 MZR |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 MZR |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 MZR |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 MZR |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 MZR |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 MZR |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 MZR |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 81 hp from 1 L | 182 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 163 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 81 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 163 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i 16V |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 163 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V R5 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 80 hp from 1 L | 182 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 84 hp from 1 L | 182 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V R6 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 80 hp from 1 L | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 163 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V R5 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 84 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V R6 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 i 16V |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 163 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i 16V |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 80 hp from 1 L | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 163 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i 16V |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 160 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i 16V |
1.84 L (1840 cc) |
21.6% smaller | - | 76 hp from 1 L | 184 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i 16V |
1.84 L (1840 cc) |
21.6% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 79 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.84 L (1840 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 184 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.84 L (1840 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 79 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 72 hp from 1 L | 160 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.84 L (1840 cc) |
21.6% smaller | 68 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 184 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.84 L (1840 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 68 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 184 cc to 100 kg |