Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 85 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 i |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | - | 78 hp from 1 L | 160 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i |
1.84 L (1839 cc) |
21.6% smaller | - | 87 hp from 1 L | 184 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i |
Precise engine size | 1.84 L (1839 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 87 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 184 cc to 100 kg |