Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i |
1.8 L (1797 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i |
2 L (1996 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 D |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 62 cc to 1 mpg | 38 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.3 i |
2.3 L (2298 cc) |
2% smaller | 85 cc to 1 mpg | 59 hp from 1 L | 177 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 i 16V |
2.5 L (2498 cc) |
6.5% bigger | 96 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 192 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 D |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | 81 cc to 1 mpg | 36 hp from 1 L | 192 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 TD |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 50 hp from 1 L | 192 cc to 100 kg |
2.6 i |
2.6 L (2597 cc) |
10.7% bigger | 113 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | 186 cc to 100 kg |
E 2.0 |
2 L (1999 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 59 hp from 1 L | - |
E 2.3-16 |
2.3 L (2300 cc) |
2% smaller | - | 77 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1797 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1996 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 D |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 62 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 38 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3 i |
Precise engine size | 2.3 L (2298 cc) |
Difference from world average | 2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 85 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 177 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 96 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 192 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 D |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 81 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 36 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 192 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 50 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 192 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.6 i |
Precise engine size | 2.6 L (2597 cc) |
Difference from world average | 10.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 113 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 186 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | E 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | E 2.3-16 |
Precise engine size | 2.3 L (2300 cc) |
Difference from world average | 2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 77 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |