Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 |
1.86 L (1859 cc) |
20.8% smaller | - | 47 hp from 1 L | 186 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
1.99 L (1988 cc) |
15.3% smaller | - | 56 hp from 1 L | 181 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.86 L (1859 cc) |
Difference from world average | 20.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 47 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 186 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1988 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 181 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 |
1.86 L (1859 cc) |
20.8% smaller | - | 47 hp from 1 L | 169 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
1.99 L (1988 cc) |
15.3% smaller | - | 56 hp from 1 L | 181 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.86 L (1859 cc) |
Difference from world average | 20.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 47 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 169 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1988 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 181 cc to 100 kg |