Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CDTi |
1.95 L (1951 cc) |
16.8% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 59 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i 16V |
1.8 L (1795 cc) |
23.5% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 112 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i 16V Turbo |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 89 hp from 1 L | 120 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 i V6 24V |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | - | 76 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
4.6 i V8 32V |
4.6 L (4601 cc) |
96.1% bigger | 256 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 288 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.95 L (1951 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1795 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 112 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V Turbo |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 89 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 120 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 32V |
Precise engine size | 4.6 L (4601 cc) |
Difference from world average | 96.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 256 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 288 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 CDTi |
1.95 L (1951 cc) |
16.8% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 59 hp from 1 L | 130 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i 16V |
1.8 L (1795 cc) |
23.5% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 120 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i 16V Turbo |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 89 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 i V6 24V |
2.5 L (2497 cc) |
6.4% bigger | 114 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
4.6 i V8 32V |
4.6 L (4601 cc) |
96.1% bigger | 256 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 288 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 CDTi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.95 L (1951 cc) |
Difference from world average | 16.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 130 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1795 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 120 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V Turbo |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 89 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2497 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 114 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 4.6 i V8 32V |
Precise engine size | 4.6 L (4601 cc) |
Difference from world average | 96.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 256 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 288 cc to 100 kg |