Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.3 DI-D |
2.27 L (2267 cc) |
3.4% smaller | - | 64 hp from 1 L | 119 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.3 DI-D |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.27 L (2267 cc) |
Difference from world average | 3.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 119 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 |
2.35 L (2349 cc) |
0.1% bigger | - | 72 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 4WD |
2.35 L (2349 cc) |
0.1% bigger | - | 72 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2349 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 4WD |
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2349 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 72 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 TD |
2.48 L (2476 cc) |
5.5% bigger | - | 42 hp from 1 L | 146 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 TD |
2.18 L (2184 cc) |
6.9% smaller | - | 36 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 |
1.79 L (1789 cc) |
23.7% smaller | - | 53 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 4WD |
1.79 L (1789 cc) |
23.7% smaller | - | 48 hp from 1 L | 112 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 4WD |
1.79 L (1789 cc) |
23.7% smaller | - | 53 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 |
2.35 L (2350 cc) |
0.2% bigger | 94 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 4WD |
2.35 L (2350 cc) |
0.2% bigger | - | 54 hp from 1 L | 138 cc to 100 kg |
2.8 TD 4WD |
2.84 L (2835 cc) |
20.8% bigger | - | 49 hp from 1 L | 135 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 TD |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.48 L (2476 cc) |
Difference from world average | 5.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 42 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 TD |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2184 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 36 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1789 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 53 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 4WD |
Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1789 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 48 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 112 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 4WD |
Precise engine size | 1.79 L (1789 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 53 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 |
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2350 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 94 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 4WD |
Precise engine size | 2.35 L (2350 cc) |
Difference from world average | 0.2 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 54 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 138 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.8 TD 4WD |
Precise engine size | 2.84 L (2835 cc) |
Difference from world average | 20.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 49 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 135 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 4WD |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 46 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | - | 46 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 4WD |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 46 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 46 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |