cat_logo
HomeMitsubishi

Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Choose Generation

Average Engine Size Mitsubishi Lancer

Mitsubishi Lancer 2016

Lancer X (facelift 2016)

Quick notes on Mitsubishi Lancer engine size

    • Average size for generation: 1.98 L (1983 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1590 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2.4 L (2360 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.36 L smaller (-363 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 397 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6399 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.56 L bigger (+1559 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 97 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

  • 2.0 —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.4 —2360 cc (2360 L)
  • 1.6 MIVEC —1590 cc (1590 L)

    2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 —13.5 cc/hp (18.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.4 —14 cc/hp (19 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 MIVEC —13.6 cc/hp (18.5 cc/kW)

    2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.4 —0.6 or 14 cc bigger
  • 1.6 MIVEC —32.23 or 756 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller 71 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.4 2.36 L
    (2360 cc)     		0.6% bigger 91 cc to 1 mpg 71 hp from 1 L 169 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 MIVEC 1.59 L
    (1590 cc)     		32.2% smaller 37 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 122 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 71 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.4
    Precise engine size 2.36 L (2360 cc)
    Difference from world average 0.6 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 91 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 71 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 169 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 MIVEC
    Precise engine size 1.59 L (1590 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 37 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 122 cc to 100 kg

    Mitsubishi Lancer 2016

    Lancer Sportback X (facelift 2016)

    Quick notes on Mitsubishi Lancer engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.69 L (1694 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1590 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1798 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.65 L smaller (-652 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 13 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 339 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.7 L smaller (-6688 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.27 L bigger (+1270 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 98 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    2016 Mitsubishi Lancer

  • 1.8 —1798 cc (1798 L)
  • 1.6 —1590 cc (1590 L)

    2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.8 —12.8 cc/hp (17.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 —13.6 cc/hp (18.5 cc/kW)

    2016 Mitsubishi Lancer Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.8 —23.36 or 548 cc smaller
  • 1.6 —32.23 or 756 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.8 1.8 L
    (1798 cc)     		23.4% smaller 50 cc to 1 mpg 78 hp from 1 L 128 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 1.59 L
    (1590 cc)     		32.2% smaller 37 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 122 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1798 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 50 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 78 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 128 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6
    Precise engine size 1.59 L (1590 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 37 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 122 cc to 100 kg

    Mitsubishi Lancer 2008

    Lancer X

    Quick notes on Mitsubishi Lancer engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.84 L (1842 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1499 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.5 L smaller (-504 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 11 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 368 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6540 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.42 L bigger (+1418 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 134 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2008 Mitsubishi Lancer

  • 1.6 MIVEC —1590 cc (1590 L)
  • 1.5i —1499 cc (1499 L)
  • 2.0 DI-D —1968 cc (1968 L)
  • Ralliart 2.0 —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0i —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • Evolution 2.0 —1997 cc (1997 L)

    2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6 MIVEC —13.6 cc/hp (18.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.5i —13.8 cc/hp (18.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 DI-D —14.1 cc/hp (19.1 cc/kW)
  • Ralliart 2.0 —8.3 cc/hp (11.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.0i —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)
  • Evolution 2.0 —6.8 cc/hp (9.2 cc/kW)

    2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6 MIVEC —32.23 or 756 cc smaller
  • 1.5i —36.1 or 847 cc smaller
  • 2.0 DI-D —16.11 or 378 cc smaller
  • Ralliart 2.0 —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0i —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • Evolution 2.0 —14.88 or 349 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6 MIVEC 1.59 L
    (1590 cc)     		32.2% smaller 39 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 122 cc to 100 kg
    1.5i 1.5 L
    (1499 cc)     		36.1% smaller 41 cc to 1 mpg 73 hp from 1 L 115 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 DI-D 1.97 L
    (1968 cc)     		16.1% smaller 50 cc to 1 mpg 71 hp from 1 L 141 cc to 100 kg
    Ralliart 2.0 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller 71 cc to 1 mpg 120 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    2.0i 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller - 75 hp from 1 L -
    Evolution 2.0 2 L
    (1997 cc)     		14.9% smaller - 148 hp from 1 L 125 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 MIVEC
    Precise engine size 1.59 L (1590 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 39 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 122 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5i
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1499 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 41 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 73 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 115 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 DI-D
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1968 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 50 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 71 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 141 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle Ralliart 2.0
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 71 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 120 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0i
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle Evolution 2.0
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 148 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 125 cc to 100 kg

    Mitsubishi Lancer 2008

    Lancer Sportback X (GS44S)

    Quick notes on Mitsubishi Lancer engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.82 L (1822 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1499 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.52 L smaller (-524 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 11 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 364 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6560 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.4 L bigger (+1398 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 140 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2008 Mitsubishi Lancer

  • 1.5 —1499 cc (1499 L)
  • Ralliart 2.0 —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.0 DI-D —1968 cc (1968 L)

    2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.5 —13.8 cc/hp (18.7 cc/kW)
  • Ralliart 2.0 —8.3 cc/hp (11.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 DI-D —14.1 cc/hp (19.1 cc/kW)

    2008 Mitsubishi Lancer Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.5 —36.1 or 847 cc smaller
  • Ralliart 2.0 —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.0 DI-D —16.11 or 378 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.5 1.5 L
    (1499 cc)     		36.1% smaller 42 cc to 1 mpg 73 hp from 1 L -
    Ralliart 2.0 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller - 120 hp from 1 L -
    2.0 DI-D 1.97 L
    (1968 cc)     		16.1% smaller 53 cc to 1 mpg 71 hp from 1 L -
    Vehicle 1.5
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1499 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 42 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 73 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle Ralliart 2.0
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 120 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 2.0 DI-D
    Precise engine size 1.97 L (1968 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 53 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 71 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -

    Mitsubishi Lancer 2006

    Lancer IX

    Quick notes on Mitsubishi Lancer engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.72 L (1719 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.3 L (1299 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1997 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.63 L smaller (-627 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 12 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 344 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.7 L smaller (-6663 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.3 L bigger (+1295 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 123 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

  • 1.6i 16V —1584 cc (1584 L)
  • 1.3i 16V —1299 cc (1299 L)
  • Sport 2.0i 16V —1997 cc (1997 L)
  • Evolution 2.0 —1997 cc (1997 L)

    2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6i 16V —16.2 cc/hp (22 cc/kW)
  • 1.3i 16V —15.8 cc/hp (21.7 cc/kW)
  • Sport 2.0i 16V —14.8 cc/hp (20.2 cc/kW)
  • Evolution 2.0 —7.1 cc/hp (9.7 cc/kW)

    2006 Mitsubishi Lancer Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6i 16V —32.48 or 762 cc smaller
  • 1.3i 16V —44.63 or 1047 cc smaller
  • Sport 2.0i 16V —14.88 or 349 cc smaller
  • Evolution 2.0 —14.88 or 349 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6i 16V 1.58 L
    (1584 cc)     		32.5% smaller 45 cc to 1 mpg 62 hp from 1 L 132 cc to 100 kg
    1.3i 16V 1.3 L
    (1299 cc)     		44.6% smaller 36 cc to 1 mpg 63 hp from 1 L 108 cc to 100 kg
    Sport 2.0i 16V 2 L
    (1997 cc)     		14.9% smaller 71 cc to 1 mpg 68 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    Evolution 2.0 2 L
    (1997 cc)     		14.9% smaller 91 cc to 1 mpg 140 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.58 L (1584 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 45 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 132 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.3i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.3 L (1299 cc)
    Difference from world average 44.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 36 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 108 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle Sport 2.0i 16V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 71 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 68 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle Evolution 2.0
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 91 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 140 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg

    Mitsubishi Lancer 2003

    Lancer IX Wagon

    Quick notes on Mitsubishi Lancer engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.72 L (1722 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1584 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1997 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.62 L smaller (-624 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 16 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 344 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.7 L smaller (-6660 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.3 L bigger (+1298 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 92 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    2003 Mitsubishi Lancer

  • 1.6 i 16V —1584 cc (1584 L)
  • Sport 1.6i 16V —1584 cc (1584 L)
  • Sport 2.0i 16V —1997 cc (1997 L)

    2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6 i 16V —16.2 cc/hp (22 cc/kW)
  • Sport 1.6i 16V —16.2 cc/hp (22 cc/kW)
  • Sport 2.0i 16V —14.8 cc/hp (20.2 cc/kW)

    2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6 i 16V —32.48 or 762 cc smaller
  • Sport 1.6i 16V —32.48 or 762 cc smaller
  • Sport 2.0i 16V —14.88 or 349 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6 i 16V 1.58 L
    (1584 cc)     		32.5% smaller 47 cc to 1 mpg 62 hp from 1 L 113 cc to 100 kg
    Sport 1.6i 16V 1.58 L
    (1584 cc)     		32.5% smaller 47 cc to 1 mpg 62 hp from 1 L 122 cc to 100 kg
    Sport 2.0i 16V 2 L
    (1997 cc)     		14.9% smaller 74 cc to 1 mpg 68 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.58 L (1584 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 47 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 113 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle Sport 1.6i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.58 L (1584 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 47 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 122 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle Sport 2.0i 16V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 74 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 68 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg

    Mitsubishi Lancer 2003

    Lancer VIII

    Quick notes on Mitsubishi Lancer engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2 L (1997 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1997 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1997 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.35 L smaller (-349 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 7 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 399 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6385 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.57 L bigger (+1573 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 185 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2003 Mitsubishi Lancer

  • Evolution 2.0 T —1997 cc (1997 L)
  • Evolution 2.0i 16V —1997 cc (1997 L)

    2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Engine size to power ratio

  • Evolution 2.0 T —7.1 cc/hp (9.7 cc/kW)
  • Evolution 2.0i 16V —7.5 cc/hp (10.2 cc/kW)

    2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Difference from world average engine size

  • Evolution 2.0 T —14.88 or 349 cc smaller
  • Evolution 2.0i 16V —14.88 or 349 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    Evolution 2.0 T 2 L
    (1997 cc)     		14.9% smaller 91 cc to 1 mpg 140 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    Evolution 2.0i 16V 2 L
    (1997 cc)     		14.9% smaller 91 cc to 1 mpg 133 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle Evolution 2.0 T
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 91 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 140 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle Evolution 2.0i 16V
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 91 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 133 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg

    Mitsubishi Lancer 2001

    Lancer VII

    Quick notes on Mitsubishi Lancer engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2 L (1997 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1997 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1997 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.35 L smaller (-349 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 7 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 399 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6385 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.57 L bigger (+1573 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 192 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2001 Mitsubishi Lancer

  • Evolution 2.0 T —1997 cc (1997 L)

    2001 Mitsubishi Lancer Engine size to power ratio

  • Evolution 2.0 T —7.1 cc/hp (9.7 cc/kW)

    2001 Mitsubishi Lancer Difference from world average engine size

  • Evolution 2.0 T —14.88 or 349 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    Evolution 2.0 T 2 L
    (1997 cc)     		14.9% smaller 91 cc to 1 mpg 140 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle Evolution 2.0 T
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 91 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 140 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg

    Mitsubishi Lancer 2000

    Lancer Cedia

    Quick notes on Mitsubishi Lancer engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.65 L (1651 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1468 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1834 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.7 L smaller (-695 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 330 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.7 L smaller (-6731 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.23 L bigger (+1227 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 95 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    2000 Mitsubishi Lancer

  • 1.5i —1468 cc (1468 L)
  • 1.8i 16V —1834 cc (1834 L)

    2000 Mitsubishi Lancer Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.5i —14 cc/hp (19.1 cc/kW)
  • 1.8i 16V —14.7 cc/hp (19.9 cc/kW)

    2000 Mitsubishi Lancer Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.5i —37.43 or 878 cc smaller
  • 1.8i 16V —21.82 or 512 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.5i 1.47 L
    (1468 cc)     		37.4% smaller - 71 hp from 1 L -
    1.8i 16V 1.83 L
    (1834 cc)     		21.8% smaller - 68 hp from 1 L -
    Vehicle 1.5i
    Precise engine size 1.47 L (1468 cc)
    Difference from world average 37.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 71 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -
    Vehicle 1.8i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.83 L (1834 cc)
    Difference from world average 21.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 68 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight -

    Mitsubishi Lancer 1996

    Lancer VI

    Quick notes on Mitsubishi Lancer engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.65 L (1650 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.3 L (1299 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1997 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.7 L smaller (-696 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 10 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 330 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.7 L smaller (-6732 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.23 L bigger (+1226 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 137 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1996 Mitsubishi Lancer

  • 1.3 12V GL,GLX —1299 cc (1299 L)
  • Evolution 2.0 T —1997 cc (1997 L)
  • 1.5 —1468 cc (1468 L)
  • 1.8 GSR —1834 cc (1834 L)

    1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.3 12V GL,GLX —17.3 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)
  • Evolution 2.0 T —7.1 cc/hp (9.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 —13.3 cc/hp (18.1 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 GSR —8.9 cc/hp (12.1 cc/kW)

    1996 Mitsubishi Lancer Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.3 12V GL,GLX —44.63 or 1047 cc smaller
  • Evolution 2.0 T —14.88 or 349 cc smaller
  • 1.5 —37.43 or 878 cc smaller
  • 1.8 GSR —21.82 or 512 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.3 12V GL,GLX 1.3 L
    (1299 cc)     		44.6% smaller - 58 hp from 1 L 130 cc to 100 kg
    Evolution 2.0 T 2 L
    (1997 cc)     		14.9% smaller - 140 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 1.47 L
    (1468 cc)     		37.4% smaller - 75 hp from 1 L 147 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 GSR 1.83 L
    (1834 cc)     		21.8% smaller - 112 hp from 1 L 141 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.3 12V GL,GLX
    Precise engine size 1.3 L (1299 cc)
    Difference from world average 44.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 130 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle Evolution 2.0 T
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 140 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5
    Precise engine size 1.47 L (1468 cc)
    Difference from world average 37.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 147 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 GSR
    Precise engine size 1.83 L (1834 cc)
    Difference from world average 21.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 112 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 141 cc to 100 kg

    Mitsubishi Lancer 1992

    Lancer V

    Quick notes on Mitsubishi Lancer engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.68 L (1677 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.3 L (1299 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.67 L smaller (-669 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 13 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 335 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.7 L smaller (-6705 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.25 L bigger (+1253 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 75 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1992 Mitsubishi Lancer

  • 1.6 16V —1597 cc (1597 L)
  • 1.5 CB3A —1496 cc (1496 L)
  • Evolution 2.0 —1997 cc (1997 L)
  • 1.3 —1299 cc (1299 L)
  • 2.0 Diesel —1998 cc (1998 L)

    1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6 16V —14.1 cc/hp (19.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 CB3A —13 cc/hp (17.6 cc/kW)
  • Evolution 2.0 —7.4 cc/hp (10 cc/kW)
  • 1.3 —17.3 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 Diesel —29.4 cc/hp (40 cc/kW)

    1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6 16V —31.93 or 749 cc smaller
  • 1.5 CB3A —36.23 or 850 cc smaller
  • Evolution 2.0 —14.88 or 349 cc smaller
  • 1.3 —44.63 or 1047 cc smaller
  • 2.0 Diesel —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6 16V 1.6 L
    (1597 cc)     		31.9% smaller 48 cc to 1 mpg 71 hp from 1 L 160 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 CB3A 1.5 L
    (1496 cc)     		36.2% smaller - 77 hp from 1 L 166 cc to 100 kg
    Evolution 2.0 2 L
    (1997 cc)     		14.9% smaller - 135 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    1.3 1.3 L
    (1299 cc)     		44.6% smaller 38 cc to 1 mpg 58 hp from 1 L 144 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 Diesel 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller 51 cc to 1 mpg 34 hp from 1 L 182 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 16V
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1597 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 48 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 71 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 160 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 CB3A
    Precise engine size 1.5 L (1496 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 77 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 166 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle Evolution 2.0
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 135 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.3
    Precise engine size 1.3 L (1299 cc)
    Difference from world average 44.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 38 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 144 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 Diesel
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 51 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 34 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 182 cc to 100 kg

    Mitsubishi Lancer 1992

    Lancer V Wagon

    Quick notes on Mitsubishi Lancer engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.8 L (1798 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.6 L (1597 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.55 L smaller (-548 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 20 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 360 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6584 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.37 L bigger (+1374 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 72 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1992 Mitsubishi Lancer

  • 1.6 16V —1597 cc (1597 L)
  • 2.0 D —1998 cc (1998 L)

    1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.6 16V —14.1 cc/hp (19.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D —29.4 cc/hp (40 cc/kW)

    1992 Mitsubishi Lancer Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.6 16V —31.93 or 749 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.6 16V 1.6 L
    (1597 cc)     		31.9% smaller 55 cc to 1 mpg 71 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller 51 cc to 1 mpg 34 hp from 1 L 182 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 16V
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1597 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 55 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 71 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 51 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 34 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 182 cc to 100 kg

    Mitsubishi Lancer 1989

    Lancer IV

    Quick notes on Mitsubishi Lancer engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.59 L (1591 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.3 L (1299 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1836 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.76 L smaller (-755 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 318 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.8 L smaller (-6791 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.17 L bigger (+1167 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 94 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1989 Mitsubishi Lancer

  • 1.3 12V —1299 cc (1299 L)
  • 1.5 12V —1468 cc (1468 L)
  • 1.6 —1595 cc (1595 L)
  • 1.8 —1755 cc (1755 L)
  • GTi 1.8 16V —1836 cc (1836 L)

    1989 Mitsubishi Lancer Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.3 12V —17.3 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 12V —16.3 cc/hp (22.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 —10 cc/hp (13.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 —18.1 cc/hp (24.7 cc/kW)
  • GTi 1.8 16V —13.5 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)

    1989 Mitsubishi Lancer Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.3 12V —44.63 or 1047 cc smaller
  • 1.5 12V —37.43 or 878 cc smaller
  • 1.6 —32.01 or 751 cc smaller
  • 1.8 —25.19 or 591 cc smaller
  • GTi 1.8 16V —21.74 or 510 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.3 12V 1.3 L
    (1299 cc)     		44.6% smaller - 58 hp from 1 L 144 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 12V 1.47 L
    (1468 cc)     		37.4% smaller 43 cc to 1 mpg 61 hp from 1 L 147 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 1.6 L
    (1595 cc)     		32% smaller - 100 hp from 1 L 160 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 1.76 L
    (1755 cc)     		25.2% smaller 70 cc to 1 mpg 55 hp from 1 L 160 cc to 100 kg
    GTi 1.8 16V 1.84 L
    (1836 cc)     		21.7% smaller 63 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 184 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.3 12V
    Precise engine size 1.3 L (1299 cc)
    Difference from world average 44.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 144 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 12V
    Precise engine size 1.47 L (1468 cc)
    Difference from world average 37.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 43 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 147 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1595 cc)
    Difference from world average 32 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 100 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 160 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1755 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 70 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 55 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 160 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle GTi 1.8 16V
    Precise engine size 1.84 L (1836 cc)
    Difference from world average 21.7 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 63 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 184 cc to 100 kg

    Mitsubishi Lancer 1988

    Lancer IV Hatchback

    Quick notes on Mitsubishi Lancer engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.58 L (1578 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.3 L (1299 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1836 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.77 L smaller (-768 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 316 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.8 L smaller (-6804 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.15 L bigger (+1154 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 80 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1988 Mitsubishi Lancer

  • 1.3 12V —1299 cc (1299 L)
  • 1.6 16V —1598 cc (1598 L)
  • 1.5 —1468 cc (1468 L)
  • 1.5 12V —1468 cc (1468 L)
  • 1.8 Diesel —1796 cc (1796 L)
  • 1.8 —1836 cc (1836 L)

    1988 Mitsubishi Lancer Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.3 12V —17.3 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 16V —14.1 cc/hp (19.3 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 —17.5 cc/hp (23.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 12V —16.3 cc/hp (22.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 Diesel —29.9 cc/hp (40.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 —13.5 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)

    1988 Mitsubishi Lancer Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.3 12V —44.63 or 1047 cc smaller
  • 1.6 16V —31.88 or 748 cc smaller
  • 1.5 —37.43 or 878 cc smaller
  • 1.5 12V —37.43 or 878 cc smaller
  • 1.8 Diesel —23.44 or 550 cc smaller
  • 1.8 —21.74 or 510 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.3 12V 1.3 L
    (1299 cc)     		44.6% smaller - 58 hp from 1 L 144 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 16V 1.6 L
    (1598 cc)     		31.9% smaller - 71 hp from 1 L 145 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 1.47 L
    (1468 cc)     		37.4% smaller - 57 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 12V 1.47 L
    (1468 cc)     		37.4% smaller 43 cc to 1 mpg 61 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 Diesel 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)     		23.4% smaller 50 cc to 1 mpg 33 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 1.84 L
    (1836 cc)     		21.7% smaller 63 cc to 1 mpg 74 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.3 12V
    Precise engine size 1.3 L (1299 cc)
    Difference from world average 44.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 144 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 16V
    Precise engine size 1.6 L (1598 cc)
    Difference from world average 31.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 71 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 145 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5
    Precise engine size 1.47 L (1468 cc)
    Difference from world average 37.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 12V
    Precise engine size 1.47 L (1468 cc)
    Difference from world average 37.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 43 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 Diesel
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 50 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 33 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.84 L (1836 cc)
    Difference from world average 21.7 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 63 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 74 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg

    Mitsubishi Lancer 1986

    Lancer III Wagon

    Quick notes on Mitsubishi Lancer engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.62 L (1622 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.5 L (1468 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1796 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.72 L smaller (-724 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 20 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 324 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.8 L smaller (-6760 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.2 L bigger (+1198 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 73 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1986 Mitsubishi Lancer

  • 1.5 —1468 cc (1468 L)
  • 1.8 —1755 cc (1755 L)
  • 1.5 12V —1468 cc (1468 L)
  • 1.8 D —1796 cc (1796 L)

    1986 Mitsubishi Lancer Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.5 —19.6 cc/hp (26.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 —18.7 cc/hp (25.4 cc/kW)
  • 1.5 12V —16.3 cc/hp (22.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 D —29.9 cc/hp (40.8 cc/kW)

    1986 Mitsubishi Lancer Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.5 —37.43 or 878 cc smaller
  • 1.8 —25.19 or 591 cc smaller
  • 1.5 12V —37.43 or 878 cc smaller
  • 1.8 D —23.44 or 550 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.5 1.47 L
    (1468 cc)     		37.4% smaller - 51 hp from 1 L 163 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 1.76 L
    (1755 cc)     		25.2% smaller - 53 hp from 1 L 146 cc to 100 kg
    1.5 12V 1.47 L
    (1468 cc)     		37.4% smaller - 61 hp from 1 L 163 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 D 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)     		23.4% smaller 51 cc to 1 mpg 33 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5
    Precise engine size 1.47 L (1468 cc)
    Difference from world average 37.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 163 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.76 L (1755 cc)
    Difference from world average 25.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 53 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 146 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.5 12V
    Precise engine size 1.47 L (1468 cc)
    Difference from world average 37.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 61 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 163 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 D
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 51 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 33 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg