Mitsubishi Minica Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Mitsubishi Minica 1999

- Average size for generation: 0.66 L (657 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 0.7 L (657 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 0.7 L (657 cc)
- Difference from world average: 1.69 L smaller (-1689 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 13 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 131 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 7.7 L smaller (-7725 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 0.23 L bigger (+233 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 94 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 2 / 10

0.7 i 12V —657 cc (657 L)

0.7 i 12V 4WD —657 cc (657 L)

0.7 i 12V —13.1 cc/hp (17.8 cc/kW)

0.7 i 12V 4WD —13.1 cc/hp (17.8 cc/kW)

0.7 i 12V —71.99 or 1689 cc smaller

0.7 i 12V 4WD —71.99 or 1689 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
0.7 i 12V	0.66 L (657 cc)	72% smaller	-	76 hp from 1 L	94 cc to 100 kg
0.7 i 12V 4WD	0.66 L (657 cc)	72% smaller	-	76 hp from 1 L	82 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	0.7 i 12V
Precise engine size	0.66 L (657 cc)
Difference from world average	72 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	76 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	94 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	0.7 i 12V 4WD
Precise engine size	0.66 L (657 cc)
Difference from world average	72 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	76 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	82 cc to 100 kg

- Average size for generation: 0.66 L (659 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 0.7 L (657 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 0.7 L (659 cc)
- Difference from world average: 1.69 L smaller (-1687 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 13 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 165 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 7.7 L smaller (-7723 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 0.24 L bigger (+235 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 100 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 2 / 10

0.66 i 20V SR-Z —659 cc (659 L)

0.66 i 16V ST-4WD —659 cc (659 L)

0.66 CE —657 cc (657 L)

0.66 16V PG —659 cc (659 L)

0.66 i 20V SR-Z —10.3 cc/hp (14 cc/kW)

0.66 i 16V ST-4WD —12 cc/hp (16.5 cc/kW)

0.66 CE —16.4 cc/hp (22.7 cc/kW)

0.66 16V PG —13.2 cc/hp (17.8 cc/kW)

0.66 i 20V SR-Z —71.91 or 1687 cc smaller

0.66 i 16V ST-4WD —71.91 or 1687 cc smaller

0.66 CE —71.99 or 1689 cc smaller

0.66 16V PG —71.91 or 1687 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
0.66 i 20V SR-Z	0.66 L (659 cc)	71.9% smaller	12 cc to 1 mpg	97 hp from 1 L	94 cc to 100 kg
0.66 i 16V ST-4WD	0.66 L (659 cc)	71.9% smaller	14 cc to 1 mpg	83 hp from 1 L	94 cc to 100 kg
0.66 CE	0.66 L (657 cc)	72% smaller	11 cc to 1 mpg	61 hp from 1 L	94 cc to 100 kg
0.66 16V PG	0.66 L (659 cc)	71.9% smaller	11 cc to 1 mpg	76 hp from 1 L	94 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	0.66 i 20V SR-Z
Precise engine size	0.66 L (659 cc)
Difference from world average	71.9 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	12 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	97 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	94 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	0.66 i 16V ST-4WD
Precise engine size	0.66 L (659 cc)
Difference from world average	71.9 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	14 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	83 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	94 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	0.66 CE
Precise engine size	0.66 L (657 cc)
Difference from world average	72 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	11 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	61 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	94 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	0.66 16V PG
Precise engine size	0.66 L (659 cc)
Difference from world average	71.9 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	11 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	76 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	94 cc to 100 kg