Mitsubishi RVR Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Mitsubishi RVR 1997

- Average size for generation: 1.89 L (1888 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1834 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1997 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.46 L smaller (-458 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 11 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 378 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6494 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.46 L bigger (+1464 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 124 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

1.8 i 16V —1834 cc (1834 L)

1.8 i 16V GDI —1834 cc (1834 L)

2.0 i 16V Turbo —1997 cc (1997 L)

1.8 i 16V —13.1 cc/hp (17.8 cc/kW)

1.8 i 16V GDI —12.2 cc/hp (16.7 cc/kW)

2.0 i 16V Turbo —8.7 cc/hp (11.8 cc/kW)

1.8 i 16V —21.82 or 512 cc smaller

1.8 i 16V GDI —21.82 or 512 cc smaller

2.0 i 16V Turbo —14.88 or 349 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
1.8 i 16V	1.83 L (1834 cc)	21.8% smaller	-	77 hp from 1 L	131 cc to 100 kg
1.8 i 16V GDI	1.83 L (1834 cc)	21.8% smaller	-	82 hp from 1 L	131 cc to 100 kg
2.0 i 16V Turbo	2 L (1997 cc)	14.9% smaller	-	115 hp from 1 L	125 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	1.8 i 16V
Precise engine size	1.83 L (1834 cc)
Difference from world average	21.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	77 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	131 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.8 i 16V GDI
Precise engine size	1.83 L (1834 cc)
Difference from world average	21.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	82 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	131 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 i 16V Turbo
Precise engine size	2 L (1997 cc)
Difference from world average	14.9 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	115 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	125 cc to 100 kg

- Average size for generation: 1.89 L (1888 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1834 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1997 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.46 L smaller (-458 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 472 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6494 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.46 L bigger (+1464 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 89 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2.0 i 16V 4WD R —1997 cc (1997 L)

1.8 i 16V Z —1834 cc (1834 L)

1.8 i 16V 4WD Z —1834 cc (1834 L)

2.0 i 16V 4WD R —12.5 cc/hp (16.9 cc/kW)

1.8 i 16V Z —15.3 cc/hp (20.8 cc/kW)

1.8 i 16V 4WD Z —15.3 cc/hp (20.8 cc/kW)

2.0 i 16V 4WD R —14.88 or 349 cc smaller

1.8 i 16V Z —21.82 or 512 cc smaller

1.8 i 16V 4WD Z —21.82 or 512 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
2.0 i 16V 4WD R	2 L (1997 cc)	14.9% smaller	-	80 hp from 1 L	154 cc to 100 kg
1.8 i 16V Z	1.83 L (1834 cc)	21.8% smaller	52 cc to 1 mpg	66 hp from 1 L	153 cc to 100 kg
1.8 i 16V 4WD Z	1.83 L (1834 cc)	21.8% smaller	-	66 hp from 1 L	131 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	2.0 i 16V 4WD R
Precise engine size	2 L (1997 cc)
Difference from world average	14.9 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	80 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	154 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.8 i 16V Z
Precise engine size	1.83 L (1834 cc)
Difference from world average	21.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	52 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	66 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	153 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.8 i 16V 4WD Z
Precise engine size	1.83 L (1834 cc)
Difference from world average	21.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	66 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	131 cc to 100 kg