Mitsubishi Space Runner Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Mitsubishi Space Runner 1999

- Average size for generation: 2.17 L (2174 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1997 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2.4 L (2351 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.17 L smaller (-172 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 15 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 435 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.2 L smaller (-6208 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.75 L bigger (+1750 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 93 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2.4 GDI —2351 cc (2351 L)

2.0 —1997 cc (1997 L)

2.4 GDI —15.7 cc/hp (21.4 cc/kW)

2.0 —14.7 cc/hp (20 cc/kW)

2.4 GDI —0.21 or 5 cc bigger

2.0 —14.88 or 349 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
2.4 GDI	2.35 L (2351 cc)	0.2% bigger	-	64 hp from 1 L	168 cc to 100 kg
2.0	2 L (1997 cc)	14.9% smaller	-	68 hp from 1 L	154 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	2.4 GDI
Precise engine size	2.35 L (2351 cc)
Difference from world average	0.2 bigger
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	64 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	168 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0
Precise engine size	2 L (1997 cc)
Difference from world average	14.9 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	68 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	154 cc to 100 kg

- Average size for generation: 1.92 L (1916 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1834 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.43 L smaller (-430 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 383 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6466 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.49 L bigger (+1492 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 88 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

1.8 —1834 cc (1834 L)

1.8 4x4 —1834 cc (1834 L)

2.0 16V —1997 cc (1997 L)

2.0 TD GLX —1998 cc (1998 L)

1.8 —15 cc/hp (20.4 cc/kW)

1.8 4x4 —15 cc/hp (20.4 cc/kW)

2.0 16V —15 cc/hp (20.4 cc/kW)

2.0 TD GLX —24.4 cc/hp (33.3 cc/kW)

1.8 —21.82 or 512 cc smaller

1.8 4x4 —21.82 or 512 cc smaller

2.0 16V —14.88 or 349 cc smaller

2.0 TD GLX —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
1.8	1.83 L (1834 cc)	21.8% smaller	66 cc to 1 mpg	67 hp from 1 L	153 cc to 100 kg
1.8 4x4	1.83 L (1834 cc)	21.8% smaller	-	67 hp from 1 L	141 cc to 100 kg
2.0 16V	2 L (1997 cc)	14.9% smaller	83 cc to 1 mpg	67 hp from 1 L	166 cc to 100 kg
2.0 TD GLX	2 L (1998 cc)	14.8% smaller	59 cc to 1 mpg	41 hp from 1 L	154 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	1.8
Precise engine size	1.83 L (1834 cc)
Difference from world average	21.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	66 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	67 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	153 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.8 4x4
Precise engine size	1.83 L (1834 cc)
Difference from world average	21.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	67 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	141 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 16V
Precise engine size	2 L (1997 cc)
Difference from world average	14.9 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	83 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	67 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	166 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 TD GLX
Precise engine size	2 L (1998 cc)
Difference from world average	14.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	59 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	41 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	154 cc to 100 kg