Mitsubishi Toppo Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Mitsubishi Toppo 2000

- Average size for generation: 0.66 L (658 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 0.7 L (657 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 0.7 L (659 cc)
- Difference from world average: 1.69 L smaller (-1688 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 12 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 165 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 7.7 L smaller (-7724 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 0.23 L bigger (+234 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 112 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 2 / 10

0.7 i 20V —659 cc (659 L)

0.7 i 12V 4WD —657 cc (657 L)

0.7 i 12V —657 cc (657 L)

0.7 i 20V —10.3 cc/hp (14 cc/kW)

0.7 i 12V 4WD —13.1 cc/hp (17.8 cc/kW)

0.7 i 12V —13.1 cc/hp (17.8 cc/kW)

0.7 i 20V —71.91 or 1687 cc smaller

0.7 i 12V 4WD —71.99 or 1689 cc smaller

0.7 i 12V —71.99 or 1689 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
0.7 i 20V	0.66 L (659 cc)	71.9% smaller	-	97 hp from 1 L	82 cc to 100 kg
0.7 i 12V 4WD	0.66 L (657 cc)	72% smaller	-	76 hp from 1 L	82 cc to 100 kg
0.7 i 12V	0.66 L (657 cc)	72% smaller	-	76 hp from 1 L	82 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	0.7 i 20V
Precise engine size	0.66 L (659 cc)
Difference from world average	71.9 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	97 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	82 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	0.7 i 12V 4WD
Precise engine size	0.66 L (657 cc)
Difference from world average	72 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	76 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	82 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	0.7 i 12V
Precise engine size	0.66 L (657 cc)
Difference from world average	72 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	76 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	82 cc to 100 kg

- Average size for generation: 0.66 L (658 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 0.7 L (657 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 0.7 L (659 cc)
- Difference from world average: 1.69 L smaller (-1688 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 13 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 132 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 7.7 L smaller (-7724 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 0.23 L bigger (+234 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 98 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 2 / 10

659 Rt —659 cc (659 L)

657 U —657 cc (657 L)

657 B —657 cc (657 L)

659 R-4WD —659 cc (659 L)

659 Rt —10.3 cc/hp (14 cc/kW)

657 U —16.4 cc/hp (22.7 cc/kW)

657 B —16.4 cc/hp (22.7 cc/kW)

659 R-4WD —12 cc/hp (16.5 cc/kW)

659 Rt —71.91 or 1687 cc smaller

657 U —71.99 or 1689 cc smaller

657 B —71.99 or 1689 cc smaller

659 R-4WD —71.91 or 1687 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
659 Rt	0.66 L (659 cc)	71.9% smaller	-	97 hp from 1 L	82 cc to 100 kg
657 U	0.66 L (657 cc)	72% smaller	-	61 hp from 1 L	94 cc to 100 kg
657 B	0.66 L (657 cc)	72% smaller	-	61 hp from 1 L	94 cc to 100 kg
659 R-4WD	0.66 L (659 cc)	71.9% smaller	14 cc to 1 mpg	83 hp from 1 L	82 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	659 Rt
Precise engine size	0.66 L (659 cc)
Difference from world average	71.9 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	97 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	82 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	657 U
Precise engine size	0.66 L (657 cc)
Difference from world average	72 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	61 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	94 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	657 B
Precise engine size	0.66 L (657 cc)
Difference from world average	72 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	61 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	94 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	659 R-4WD
Precise engine size	0.66 L (659 cc)
Difference from world average	71.9 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	14 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	83 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	82 cc to 100 kg