Morgan Plus Four Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Morgan Plus Four 2005

- Average size for generation: 2 L (1999 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1999 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1999 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.35 L smaller (-347 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 13 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 1000 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6383 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.58 L bigger (+1575 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 101 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2.0 —1999 cc (1999 L)

2.0 —13 cc/hp (17.7 cc/kW)

2.0 —14.79 or 347 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
2.0	2 L (1999 cc)	14.8% smaller	61 cc to 1 mpg	77 hp from 1 L	222 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	2.0
Precise engine size	2 L (1999 cc)
Difference from world average	14.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	61 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	77 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	222 cc to 100 kg

- Average size for generation: 1.99 L (1994 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1994 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1994 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.35 L smaller (-352 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 499 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6388 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.57 L bigger (+1570 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 89 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2.0 i —1994 cc (1994 L)

2.0 i —14.2 cc/hp (19.4 cc/kW)

2.0 i —15 or 352 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
2.0 i	1.99 L (1994 cc)	15% smaller	-	70 hp from 1 L	-

Vehicle	2.0 i
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1994 cc)
Difference from world average	15 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	70 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	-