Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 16V Turbo |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 100 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 16V Turbo |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 100 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 Turbo |
1.81 L (1809 cc) |
22.9% smaller | 70 cc to 1 mpg | 93 hp from 1 L | 151 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 Turbo |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.81 L (1809 cc) |
Difference from world average | 22.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 70 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 93 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 151 cc to 100 kg |