2020 Almera IV (N18)
2015 Almera III (N17, facelift 2015)
2013 Almera (G11)
2003 Almera Tino (facelift 2003)
2003 Almera II Hatchback (N16, facelift 2003)
2003 Almera II (N16, facelift 2003)
2000 Almera II (N16)
2000 Almera II Hatchback (N16)
2000 Almera Tino
1995 Almera I (N15)
1995 Almera I Hatchback (N15)
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.0 Turbo |
1 L (999 cc) |
57.4% smaller | 18 cc to 1 mpg | 100 hp from 1 L | 91 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.0 Turbo |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1 L (999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 57.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 18 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 100 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 91 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
1.2i |
1.2 L (1198 cc) |
48.9% smaller | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 120 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.2i |
Precise engine size | 1.2 L (1198 cc) |
Difference from world average | 48.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 120 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 57 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 57 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
1.77 L (1769 cc) |
24.6% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 126 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 Di |
2.18 L (2184 cc) |
6.9% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 52 hp from 1 L | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.77 L (1769 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 126 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 Di |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2184 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.2 d |
2.18 L (2184 cc) |
6.9% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 51 hp from 1 L | 182 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 16V |
1.77 L (1769 cc) |
24.6% smaller | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 161 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 d |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2184 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 51 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.77 L (1769 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 161 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V |
1.77 L (1769 cc) |
24.6% smaller | - | 66 hp from 1 L | 161 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.77 L (1769 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 161 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 16V |
1.77 L (1769 cc) |
24.6% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.77 L (1769 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
1.77 L (1769 cc) |
24.6% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 161 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 16V |
1.77 L (1769 cc) |
24.6% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.77 L (1769 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 161 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.77 L (1769 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 147 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
1.77 L (1769 cc) |
24.6% smaller | 61 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.77 L (1769 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.6 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 61 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 SLX |
1.6 L (1597 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 56 hp from 1 L | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 SLX |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1597 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 SR,SLX |
1.6 L (1597 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 44 cc to 1 mpg | 56 hp from 1 L | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 SR,SLX |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1597 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 44 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 123 cc to 100 kg |