Nissan March Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Nissan March 2003

- Average size for generation: 1.31 L (1313 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 1.2 L (1240 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 1.4 L (1386 cc)
- Difference from world average: 1.03 L smaller (-1033 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 16 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 263 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 7.1 L smaller (-7069 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 0.89 L bigger (+889 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 91 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 4 / 10

1.4 i 16V —1386 cc (1386 L)

1.2 i 16V —1240 cc (1240 L)

1.4 i 16V —15.8 cc/hp (21.3 cc/kW)

1.2 i 16V —15.5 cc/hp (21 cc/kW)

1.4 i 16V —40.92 or 960 cc smaller

1.2 i 16V —47.14 or 1106 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
1.4 i 16V	1.39 L (1386 cc)	40.9% smaller	40 cc to 1 mpg	63 hp from 1 L	139 cc to 100 kg
1.2 i 16V	1.24 L (1240 cc)	47.1% smaller	34 cc to 1 mpg	65 hp from 1 L	124 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	1.4 i 16V
Precise engine size	1.39 L (1386 cc)
Difference from world average	40.9 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	40 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	63 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	139 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.2 i 16V
Precise engine size	1.24 L (1240 cc)
Difference from world average	47.1 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	34 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	65 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	124 cc to 100 kg

- Average size for generation: 1.16 L (1155 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 1 L (998 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 1.3 L (1348 cc)
- Difference from world average: 1.19 L smaller (-1191 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 231 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 7.2 L smaller (-7227 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 0.73 L bigger (+731 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 80 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 4 / 10

1.4 —1348 cc (1348 L)

1.0i 16V —998 cc (998 L)

1.3i 16V —1275 cc (1275 L)

1.0 —998 cc (998 L)

1.4 —16.4 cc/hp (22.5 cc/kW)

1.0i 16V —18.5 cc/hp (25 cc/kW)

1.3i 16V —17 cc/hp (23.2 cc/kW)

1.0 —16.6 cc/hp (22.7 cc/kW)

1.4 —42.54 or 998 cc smaller

1.0i 16V —57.46 or 1348 cc smaller

1.3i 16V —45.65 or 1071 cc smaller

1.0 —57.46 or 1348 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
1.4	1.35 L (1348 cc)	42.5% smaller	-	61 hp from 1 L	150 cc to 100 kg
1.0i 16V	1 L (998 cc)	57.5% smaller	26 cc to 1 mpg	54 hp from 1 L	125 cc to 100 kg
1.3i 16V	1.28 L (1275 cc)	45.7% smaller	36 cc to 1 mpg	59 hp from 1 L	159 cc to 100 kg
1.0	1 L (998 cc)	57.5% smaller	-	60 hp from 1 L	125 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	1.4
Precise engine size	1.35 L (1348 cc)
Difference from world average	42.5 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	61 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	150 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.0i 16V
Precise engine size	1 L (998 cc)
Difference from world average	57.5 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	26 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	54 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	125 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.3i 16V
Precise engine size	1.28 L (1275 cc)
Difference from world average	45.7 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	36 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	59 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	159 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.0
Precise engine size	1 L (998 cc)
Difference from world average	57.5 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	60 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	125 cc to 100 kg