Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 i 4X4 |
1.97 L (1974 cc) |
15.9% smaller | 90 cc to 1 mpg | 50 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 i 4X4 |
2.39 L (2389 cc) |
1.8% bigger | 109 cc to 1 mpg | 56 hp from 1 L | 171 cc to 100 kg |
2.4 i |
2.39 L (2389 cc) |
1.8% bigger | 100 cc to 1 mpg | 56 hp from 1 L | 184 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i |
1.97 L (1974 cc) |
15.9% smaller | 82 cc to 1 mpg | 50 hp from 1 L | 165 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i 4X4 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1974 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 90 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 50 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 i 4X4 |
Precise engine size | 2.39 L (2389 cc) |
Difference from world average | 1.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 109 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 171 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 i |
Precise engine size | 2.39 L (2389 cc) |
Difference from world average | 1.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 100 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 184 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Precise engine size | 1.97 L (1974 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 82 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 50 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 165 cc to 100 kg |