Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 DiG-T |
1.62 L (1618 cc) |
31% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 101 hp from 1 L | 101 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 dCi |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 89 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 dCi |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 35 cc to 1 mpg | 81 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
1.7 dCi |
1.75 L (1749 cc) |
25.4% smaller | 45 cc to 1 mpg | 86 hp from 1 L | 97 cc to 100 kg |
1.3 DIG-T |
1.33 L (1332 cc) |
43.2% smaller | 36 cc to 1 mpg | 120 hp from 1 L | 83 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 DiG-T |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.62 L (1618 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 101 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 101 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 89 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 dCi |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 35 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 81 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.7 dCi |
Precise engine size | 1.75 L (1749 cc) |
Difference from world average | 25.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 45 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 86 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 97 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.3 DIG-T |
Precise engine size | 1.33 L (1332 cc) |
Difference from world average | 43.2 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 36 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 83 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 dCi |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 33 cc to 1 mpg | 81 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 DIG-T |
1.62 L (1618 cc) |
31% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 101 hp from 1 L | 108 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 dCi |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 89 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 dCi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 33 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 81 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 DIG-T |
Precise engine size | 1.62 L (1618 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 101 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 108 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 89 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 dCi |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 dCi |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 62 cc to 1 mpg | 87 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 62 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 87 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i 16V |
2.49 L (2488 cc) |
6.1% bigger | 104 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 dCi |
2.18 L (2184 cc) |
6.9% smaller | 70 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.49 L (2488 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 104 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi |
Precise engine size | 2.18 L (2184 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 70 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |