Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 105 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 58 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.5i V6 |
2.5 L (2498 cc) |
6.5% bigger | 109 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 178 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i Turbo |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 102 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 105 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 109 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 178 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 102 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |