cat_logo
HomeOpel

Manta

Opel Manta Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Choose Generation

Average Engine Size Opel Manta

Opel Manta 1984

Manta B CC (facelift 1982)

Quick notes on Opel Manta engine size

    • Average size for generation: 1.76 L (1763 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 1.3 L (1297 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1979 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.58 L smaller (-583 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 19 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 441 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6619 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.34 L bigger (+1339 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 79 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

1984 Opel Manta

  • 1.3 S —1297 cc (1297 L)
  • 1.8 S —1796 cc (1796 L)
  • 2.0 S —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 2.0 GSi —1979 cc (1979 L)

    1984 Opel Manta Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.3 S —17.3 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 S —20 cc/hp (27.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 S —19.8 cc/hp (26.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 GSi —18.5 cc/hp (25.1 cc/kW)

    1984 Opel Manta Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.3 S —44.71 or 1049 cc smaller
  • 1.8 S —23.44 or 550 cc smaller
  • 2.0 S —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 2.0 GSi —15.64 or 367 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.3 S 1.3 L
    (1297 cc)     		44.7% smaller - 58 hp from 1 L 130 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 S 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)     		23.4% smaller - 50 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 S 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller - 51 hp from 1 L 198 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 GSi 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller - 54 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.3 S
    Precise engine size 1.3 L (1297 cc)
    Difference from world average 44.7 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 130 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 S
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 50 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 S
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 198 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 GSi
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 54 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg

    Opel Manta 1983

    Manta B (facelift 1982)

    Quick notes on Opel Manta engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.81 L (1806 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.3 L (1297 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1979 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.54 L smaller (-540 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 15 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 452 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.6 L smaller (-6576 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.38 L bigger (+1382 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 85 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1983 Opel Manta

  • 2.0 GSi —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 1.3 S —1297 cc (1297 L)
  • 2.0 200 Rallye Gruppe —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 2.0 200 —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 1.8 S —1796 cc (1796 L)

    1983 Opel Manta Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 GSi —18 cc/hp (24.4 cc/kW)
  • 1.3 S —17.3 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 200 Rallye Gruppe —10.6 cc/hp (14.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 200 —15.8 cc/hp (21.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 S —20 cc/hp (27.2 cc/kW)

    1983 Opel Manta Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 GSi —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 1.3 S —44.71 or 1049 cc smaller
  • 2.0 200 Rallye Gruppe —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 2.0 200 —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 1.8 S —23.44 or 550 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 GSi 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller - 56 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    1.3 S 1.3 L
    (1297 cc)     		44.7% smaller - 58 hp from 1 L 130 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 200 Rallye Gruppe 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller - 94 hp from 1 L 198 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 200 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller - 63 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 S 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)     		23.4% smaller - 50 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 GSi
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 56 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.3 S
    Precise engine size 1.3 L (1297 cc)
    Difference from world average 44.7 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 130 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 200 Rallye Gruppe
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 94 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 198 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 200
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 63 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 S
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 50 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg

    Opel Manta 1981

    Manta B

    Quick notes on Opel Manta engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.71 L (1713 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.2 L (1196 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.4 L (2410 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.63 L smaller (-633 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 20 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 428 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.7 L smaller (-6669 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.29 L bigger (+1289 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 76 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1981 Opel Manta

  • 1.2 N —1196 cc (1196 L)
  • 1.2 S —1196 cc (1196 L)
  • 1.3 N —1297 cc (1297 L)
  • 1.3 S —1297 cc (1297 L)
  • 1.6 N —1584 cc (1584 L)
  • 1.6 S —1584 cc (1584 L)
  • 1.9 E —1897 cc (1897 L)
  • 1.8 S —1796 cc (1796 L)
  • 1.9 N —1897 cc (1897 L)
  • 1.9 S —1897 cc (1897 L)
  • 2.0 —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 2.0 E —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 2.0 S —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 2.4 400 —2410 cc (2410 L)

    1981 Opel Manta Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.2 N —21.7 cc/hp (29.9 cc/kW)
  • 1.2 S —19.9 cc/hp (27.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.3 N —21.6 cc/hp (29.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.3 S —17.3 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 N —26.4 cc/hp (36 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 S —21.1 cc/hp (28.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 E —18.1 cc/hp (24.6 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 S —20 cc/hp (27.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 N —25.3 cc/hp (34.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 S —21.1 cc/hp (28.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —22 cc/hp (30 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 E —18 cc/hp (24.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 S —19.8 cc/hp (26.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.4 400 —16.7 cc/hp (22.7 cc/kW)

    1981 Opel Manta Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.2 N —49.02 or 1150 cc smaller
  • 1.2 S —49.02 or 1150 cc smaller
  • 1.3 N —44.71 or 1049 cc smaller
  • 1.3 S —44.71 or 1049 cc smaller
  • 1.6 N —32.48 or 762 cc smaller
  • 1.6 S —32.48 or 762 cc smaller
  • 1.9 E —19.14 or 449 cc smaller
  • 1.8 S —23.44 or 550 cc smaller
  • 1.9 N —19.14 or 449 cc smaller
  • 1.9 S —19.14 or 449 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 2.0 E —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 2.0 S —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 2.4 400 —2.73 or 64 cc bigger

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.2 N 1.2 L
    (1196 cc)     		49% smaller - 46 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    1.2 S 1.2 L
    (1196 cc)     		49% smaller - 50 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    1.3 N 1.3 L
    (1297 cc)     		44.7% smaller - 46 hp from 1 L 144 cc to 100 kg
    1.3 S 1.3 L
    (1297 cc)     		44.7% smaller - 58 hp from 1 L 118 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 N 1.58 L
    (1584 cc)     		32.5% smaller - 38 hp from 1 L 158 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 S 1.58 L
    (1584 cc)     		32.5% smaller - 47 hp from 1 L 158 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 E 1.9 L
    (1897 cc)     		19.1% smaller - 55 hp from 1 L 190 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 S 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)     		23.4% smaller - 50 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 N 1.9 L
    (1897 cc)     		19.1% smaller - 39 hp from 1 L 190 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 S 1.9 L
    (1897 cc)     		19.1% smaller - 47 hp from 1 L 190 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller - 45 hp from 1 L 198 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 E 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller - 56 hp from 1 L 198 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 S 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller - 51 hp from 1 L 198 cc to 100 kg
    2.4 400 2.41 L
    (2410 cc)     		2.7% bigger - 60 hp from 1 L 219 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.2 N
    Precise engine size 1.2 L (1196 cc)
    Difference from world average 49 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 46 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.2 S
    Precise engine size 1.2 L (1196 cc)
    Difference from world average 49 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 50 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.3 N
    Precise engine size 1.3 L (1297 cc)
    Difference from world average 44.7 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 46 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 144 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.3 S
    Precise engine size 1.3 L (1297 cc)
    Difference from world average 44.7 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 58 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 118 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 N
    Precise engine size 1.58 L (1584 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 38 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 158 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 S
    Precise engine size 1.58 L (1584 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 47 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 158 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 E
    Precise engine size 1.9 L (1897 cc)
    Difference from world average 19.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 55 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 190 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 S
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 50 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 N
    Precise engine size 1.9 L (1897 cc)
    Difference from world average 19.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 39 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 190 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 S
    Precise engine size 1.9 L (1897 cc)
    Difference from world average 19.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 47 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 190 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 45 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 198 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 56 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 198 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 S
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 198 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.4 400
    Precise engine size 2.41 L (2410 cc)
    Difference from world average 2.7 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 60 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 219 cc to 100 kg

    Opel Manta 1977

    Manta B CC

    Quick notes on Opel Manta engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.64 L (1638 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.2 L (1196 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1979 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.71 L smaller (-708 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 22 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 410 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.7 L smaller (-6744 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.21 L bigger (+1214 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 73 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1977 Opel Manta

  • 1.3 N —1297 cc (1297 L)
  • 1.6 N —1584 cc (1584 L)
  • 1.9 N —1897 cc (1897 L)
  • 2.0 E —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 2.0 —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 1.2 N —1196 cc (1196 L)
  • 1.2 S —1196 cc (1196 L)
  • 2.0 S —1979 cc (1979 L)

    1977 Opel Manta Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.3 N —21.6 cc/hp (29.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 N —26.4 cc/hp (36 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 N —25.3 cc/hp (34.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 E —18 cc/hp (24.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —22 cc/hp (30 cc/kW)
  • 1.2 N —21.7 cc/hp (29.9 cc/kW)
  • 1.2 S —19.9 cc/hp (27.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 S —19.8 cc/hp (26.7 cc/kW)

    1977 Opel Manta Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.3 N —44.71 or 1049 cc smaller
  • 1.6 N —32.48 or 762 cc smaller
  • 1.9 N —19.14 or 449 cc smaller
  • 2.0 E —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 1.2 N —49.02 or 1150 cc smaller
  • 1.2 S —49.02 or 1150 cc smaller
  • 2.0 S —15.64 or 367 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.3 N 1.3 L
    (1297 cc)     		44.7% smaller - 46 hp from 1 L 144 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 N 1.58 L
    (1584 cc)     		32.5% smaller - 38 hp from 1 L 158 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 N 1.9 L
    (1897 cc)     		19.1% smaller - 39 hp from 1 L 190 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 E 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller - 56 hp from 1 L 198 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller - 45 hp from 1 L 198 cc to 100 kg
    1.2 N 1.2 L
    (1196 cc)     		49% smaller - 46 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    1.2 S 1.2 L
    (1196 cc)     		49% smaller - 50 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 S 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller - 51 hp from 1 L 198 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.3 N
    Precise engine size 1.3 L (1297 cc)
    Difference from world average 44.7 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 46 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 144 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 N
    Precise engine size 1.58 L (1584 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 38 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 158 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 N
    Precise engine size 1.9 L (1897 cc)
    Difference from world average 19.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 39 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 190 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 56 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 198 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 45 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 198 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.2 N
    Precise engine size 1.2 L (1196 cc)
    Difference from world average 49 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 46 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.2 S
    Precise engine size 1.2 L (1196 cc)
    Difference from world average 49 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 50 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 S
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 198 cc to 100 kg

    Opel Manta 1970

    Manta A

    Quick notes on Opel Manta engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.63 L (1632 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.2 L (1196 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 1.9 L (1897 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.71 L smaller (-714 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 20 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 408 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.8 L smaller (-6750 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.21 L bigger (+1208 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 77 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

    1970 Opel Manta

  • 1.2 —1196 cc (1196 L)
  • 1.6 —1584 cc (1584 L)
  • 1.9 GT/E —1897 cc (1897 L)
  • 1.6 S —1584 cc (1584 L)
  • 1.9 S —1897 cc (1897 L)

    1970 Opel Manta Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.2 —19.9 cc/hp (27.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 —21.1 cc/hp (28.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 GT/E —18.1 cc/hp (24.6 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 S —19.8 cc/hp (26.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 S —21.6 cc/hp (29.2 cc/kW)

    1970 Opel Manta Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.2 —49.02 or 1150 cc smaller
  • 1.6 —32.48 or 762 cc smaller
  • 1.9 GT/E —19.14 or 449 cc smaller
  • 1.6 S —32.48 or 762 cc smaller
  • 1.9 S —19.14 or 449 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.2 1.2 L
    (1196 cc)     		49% smaller - 50 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 1.58 L
    (1584 cc)     		32.5% smaller - 47 hp from 1 L 176 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 GT/E 1.9 L
    (1897 cc)     		19.1% smaller - 55 hp from 1 L 190 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 S 1.58 L
    (1584 cc)     		32.5% smaller - 51 hp from 1 L 176 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 S 1.9 L
    (1897 cc)     		19.1% smaller - 46 hp from 1 L 211 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.2
    Precise engine size 1.2 L (1196 cc)
    Difference from world average 49 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 50 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6
    Precise engine size 1.58 L (1584 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 47 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 176 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 GT/E
    Precise engine size 1.9 L (1897 cc)
    Difference from world average 19.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 55 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 190 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 S
    Precise engine size 1.58 L (1584 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 176 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 S
    Precise engine size 1.9 L (1897 cc)
    Difference from world average 19.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 46 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 211 cc to 100 kg