cat_logo
HomeOpel

Rekord

Opel Rekord Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Choose Generation

Average Engine Size Opel Rekord

Opel Rekord 1984

1982 Rekord E Caravan (facelift 1982)

Quick notes on Opel Rekord engine size

    • Average size for generation: 2.01 L (2008 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2.3 L (2260 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.34 L smaller (-338 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 22 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 402 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6374 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.58 L bigger (+1584 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 77 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

1984 Opel Rekord

  • 2.3 D —2260 cc (2260 L)
  • 2.0 S —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 1.8 S —1796 cc (1796 L)
  • 2.0 E —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 2.2i —2197 cc (2197 L)
  • 1.8 E —1796 cc (1796 L)
  • 1.8 —1796 cc (1796 L)
  • 2.2 TD —2260 cc (2260 L)

    1984 Opel Rekord Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.3 D —31.8 cc/hp (43.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 S —20.2 cc/hp (27.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 S —20 cc/hp (27.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 E —18 cc/hp (24.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.2i —19.1 cc/hp (25.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 E —18 cc/hp (24.3 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 —23.9 cc/hp (32.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 TD —26.3 cc/hp (35.9 cc/kW)

    1984 Opel Rekord Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.3 D —3.67 or 86 cc smaller
  • 2.0 S —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 1.8 S —23.44 or 550 cc smaller
  • 2.0 E —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 2.2i —6.35 or 149 cc smaller
  • 1.8 E —23.44 or 550 cc smaller
  • 1.8 —23.44 or 550 cc smaller
  • 2.2 TD —3.67 or 86 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.3 D 2.26 L
    (2260 cc)     		3.7% smaller 66 cc to 1 mpg 31 hp from 1 L 174 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 S 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller 110 cc to 1 mpg 49 hp from 1 L 165 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 S 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)     		23.4% smaller 64 cc to 1 mpg 50 hp from 1 L 163 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 E 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller 76 cc to 1 mpg 56 hp from 1 L 165 cc to 100 kg
    2.2i 2.2 L
    (2197 cc)     		6.4% smaller 88 cc to 1 mpg 52 hp from 1 L 183 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 E 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)     		23.4% smaller 64 cc to 1 mpg 56 hp from 1 L 150 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)     		23.4% smaller 75 cc to 1 mpg 42 hp from 1 L 163 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 TD 2.26 L
    (2260 cc)     		3.7% smaller 78 cc to 1 mpg 38 hp from 1 L 174 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 D
    Precise engine size 2.26 L (2260 cc)
    Difference from world average 3.7 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 66 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 31 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 174 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 S
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 110 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 49 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 165 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 S
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 64 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 50 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 163 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 76 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 56 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 165 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2i
    Precise engine size 2.2 L (2197 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 88 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 52 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 183 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 E
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 64 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 56 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 150 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 75 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 42 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 163 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 TD
    Precise engine size 2.26 L (2260 cc)
    Difference from world average 3.7 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 78 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 38 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 174 cc to 100 kg

    Opel Rekord 1984

    1982 Rekord E (facelift 1982)

    Quick notes on Opel Rekord engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.04 L (2036 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1796 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.3 L (2260 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.31 L smaller (-310 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 23 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 407 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6346 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.61 L bigger (+1612 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 75 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1984 Opel Rekord

  • 2.2 E —2197 cc (2197 L)
  • 2.3 D —2260 cc (2260 L)
  • 2.0 S —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 2.0 E —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 1.8 S —1796 cc (1796 L)
  • 2.2 D —2260 cc (2260 L)
  • 1.8i CAT —1796 cc (1796 L)
  • 1.8 —1796 cc (1796 L)
  • 2.3 TD —2260 cc (2260 L)

    1984 Opel Rekord Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.2 E —19.1 cc/hp (25.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 D —34.8 cc/hp (47.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 S —19.8 cc/hp (26.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 E —18 cc/hp (24.4 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 S —20 cc/hp (27.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.2 D —31.8 cc/hp (43.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.8i CAT —18 cc/hp (24.3 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 —23.9 cc/hp (32.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 TD —26.3 cc/hp (35.9 cc/kW)

    1984 Opel Rekord Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.2 E —6.35 or 149 cc smaller
  • 2.3 D —3.67 or 86 cc smaller
  • 2.0 S —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 2.0 E —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 1.8 S —23.44 or 550 cc smaller
  • 2.2 D —3.67 or 86 cc smaller
  • 1.8i CAT —23.44 or 550 cc smaller
  • 1.8 —23.44 or 550 cc smaller
  • 2.3 TD —3.67 or 86 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.2 E 2.2 L
    (2197 cc)     		6.4% smaller 78 cc to 1 mpg 52 hp from 1 L 200 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 D 2.26 L
    (2260 cc)     		3.7% smaller 65 cc to 1 mpg 29 hp from 1 L 174 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 S 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller 73 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 E 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller 73 cc to 1 mpg 56 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 S 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)     		23.4% smaller 62 cc to 1 mpg 50 hp from 1 L 163 cc to 100 kg
    2.2 D 2.26 L
    (2260 cc)     		3.7% smaller 65 cc to 1 mpg 31 hp from 1 L 188 cc to 100 kg
    1.8i CAT 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)     		23.4% smaller 69 cc to 1 mpg 56 hp from 1 L 163 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)     		23.4% smaller 69 cc to 1 mpg 42 hp from 1 L 163 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 TD 2.26 L
    (2260 cc)     		3.7% smaller 66 cc to 1 mpg 38 hp from 1 L 188 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 E
    Precise engine size 2.2 L (2197 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 78 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 52 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 200 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 D
    Precise engine size 2.26 L (2260 cc)
    Difference from world average 3.7 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 65 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 29 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 174 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 S
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 73 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 73 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 56 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 S
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 62 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 50 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 163 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 D
    Precise engine size 2.26 L (2260 cc)
    Difference from world average 3.7 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 65 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 31 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 188 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8i CAT
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 69 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 56 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 163 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 69 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 42 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 163 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 TD
    Precise engine size 2.26 L (2260 cc)
    Difference from world average 3.7 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 66 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 38 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 188 cc to 100 kg

    Opel Rekord 1978

    1978 Rekord E

    Quick notes on Opel Rekord engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.98 L (1980 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.7 L (1698 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.3 L (2260 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.37 L smaller (-366 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 25 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 396 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6402 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.56 L bigger (+1556 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 68 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1978 Opel Rekord

  • 2.0 E —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 2.0 S —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 2.1 D —2068 cc (2068 L)
  • 1.9 —1897 cc (1897 L)
  • 2.0 —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 1.7 —1698 cc (1698 L)
  • 2.3 D —2260 cc (2260 L)

    1978 Opel Rekord Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 E —18 cc/hp (24.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 S —19.6 cc/hp (26.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.1 D —34.5 cc/hp (47 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 —25.3 cc/hp (34.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —22 cc/hp (30 cc/kW)
  • 1.7 —28.3 cc/hp (38.6 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 D —34.8 cc/hp (47.1 cc/kW)

    1978 Opel Rekord Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 E —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 2.0 S —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 2.1 D —11.85 or 278 cc smaller
  • 1.9 —19.14 or 449 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 1.7 —27.62 or 648 cc smaller
  • 2.3 D —3.67 or 86 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 E 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller 79 cc to 1 mpg 56 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 S 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller 76 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    2.1 D 2.07 L
    (2068 cc)     		11.8% smaller 69 cc to 1 mpg 29 hp from 1 L 172 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 1.9 L
    (1897 cc)     		19.1% smaller 79 cc to 1 mpg 39 hp from 1 L 172 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller 86 cc to 1 mpg 45 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    1.7 1.7 L
    (1698 cc)     		27.6% smaller 71 cc to 1 mpg 35 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 D 2.26 L
    (2260 cc)     		3.7% smaller 81 cc to 1 mpg 29 hp from 1 L 188 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 79 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 56 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 S
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 76 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.1 D
    Precise engine size 2.07 L (2068 cc)
    Difference from world average 11.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 69 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 29 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 172 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9
    Precise engine size 1.9 L (1897 cc)
    Difference from world average 19.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 79 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 39 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 172 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 86 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 45 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.7
    Precise engine size 1.7 L (1698 cc)
    Difference from world average 27.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 71 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 35 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 D
    Precise engine size 2.26 L (2260 cc)
    Difference from world average 3.7 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 81 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 29 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 188 cc to 100 kg

    Opel Rekord 1977

    1978 Rekord E Caravan

    Quick notes on Opel Rekord engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.98 L (1980 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.7 L (1698 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.3 L (2260 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.37 L smaller (-366 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 25 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 396 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6402 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.56 L bigger (+1556 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 68 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1977 Opel Rekord

  • 2.0 S —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 2.1 D —2068 cc (2068 L)
  • 1.9 —1897 cc (1897 L)
  • 2.0 E —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 2.3 D —2260 cc (2260 L)
  • 2.0 —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 1.7 —1698 cc (1698 L)

    1977 Opel Rekord Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 S —19.6 cc/hp (26.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.1 D —34.5 cc/hp (47 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 —25.3 cc/hp (34.5 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 E —18 cc/hp (24.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.3 D —34.8 cc/hp (47.1 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —22 cc/hp (30 cc/kW)
  • 1.7 —28.3 cc/hp (38.6 cc/kW)

    1977 Opel Rekord Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 S —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 2.1 D —11.85 or 278 cc smaller
  • 1.9 —19.14 or 449 cc smaller
  • 2.0 E —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 2.3 D —3.67 or 86 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 1.7 —27.62 or 648 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 S 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller 79 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    2.1 D 2.07 L
    (2068 cc)     		11.8% smaller 71 cc to 1 mpg 29 hp from 1 L 159 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 1.9 L
    (1897 cc)     		19.1% smaller 79 cc to 1 mpg 39 hp from 1 L 172 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 E 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller 79 cc to 1 mpg 56 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    2.3 D 2.26 L
    (2260 cc)     		3.7% smaller 81 cc to 1 mpg 29 hp from 1 L 174 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller 86 cc to 1 mpg 45 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    1.7 1.7 L
    (1698 cc)     		27.6% smaller 77 cc to 1 mpg 35 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 S
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 79 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.1 D
    Precise engine size 2.07 L (2068 cc)
    Difference from world average 11.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 71 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 29 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 159 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9
    Precise engine size 1.9 L (1897 cc)
    Difference from world average 19.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 79 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 39 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 172 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 E
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 79 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 56 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.3 D
    Precise engine size 2.26 L (2260 cc)
    Difference from world average 3.7 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 81 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 29 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 174 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 86 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 45 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.7
    Precise engine size 1.7 L (1698 cc)
    Difference from world average 27.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 77 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 35 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg

    Opel Rekord 1975

    1972 Rekord D Caravan

    Quick notes on Opel Rekord engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.89 L (1891 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.7 L (1698 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.1 L (2068 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.46 L smaller (-455 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 24 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 378 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6491 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.47 L bigger (+1467 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 70 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1975 Opel Rekord

  • 1.7 —1698 cc (1698 L)
  • 1.9 —1897 cc (1897 L)
  • 1.7 S —1698 cc (1698 L)
  • 1.9 S —1897 cc (1897 L)
  • 2.0 D —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.1 D —2068 cc (2068 L)
  • 2.0 S —1979 cc (1979 L)

    1975 Opel Rekord Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.7 —25.7 cc/hp (34.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 —21.1 cc/hp (28.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.7 S —20.5 cc/hp (27.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 S —19.6 cc/hp (26.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D —36.3 cc/hp (50 cc/kW)
  • 2.1 D —34.5 cc/hp (47 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 S —19.8 cc/hp (26.7 cc/kW)

    1975 Opel Rekord Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.7 —27.62 or 648 cc smaller
  • 1.9 —19.14 or 449 cc smaller
  • 1.7 S —27.62 or 648 cc smaller
  • 1.9 S —19.14 or 449 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.1 D —11.85 or 278 cc smaller
  • 2.0 S —15.64 or 367 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.7 1.7 L
    (1698 cc)     		27.6% smaller 81 cc to 1 mpg 39 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 1.9 L
    (1897 cc)     		19.1% smaller 95 cc to 1 mpg 47 hp from 1 L 172 cc to 100 kg
    1.7 S 1.7 L
    (1698 cc)     		27.6% smaller 77 cc to 1 mpg 49 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 S 1.9 L
    (1897 cc)     		19.1% smaller 95 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 172 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller 69 cc to 1 mpg 28 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.1 D 2.07 L
    (2068 cc)     		11.8% smaller 71 cc to 1 mpg 29 hp from 1 L 159 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 S 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller 99 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.7
    Precise engine size 1.7 L (1698 cc)
    Difference from world average 27.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 81 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 39 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9
    Precise engine size 1.9 L (1897 cc)
    Difference from world average 19.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 95 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 47 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 172 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.7 S
    Precise engine size 1.7 L (1698 cc)
    Difference from world average 27.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 77 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 49 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 S
    Precise engine size 1.9 L (1897 cc)
    Difference from world average 19.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 95 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 172 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 69 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 28 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.1 D
    Precise engine size 2.07 L (2068 cc)
    Difference from world average 11.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 71 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 29 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 159 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 S
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 99 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg

    Opel Rekord 1972

    1972 Rekord D

    Quick notes on Opel Rekord engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.89 L (1891 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.7 L (1698 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.1 L (2068 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.46 L smaller (-455 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 24 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 378 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6491 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.47 L bigger (+1467 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 70 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1972 Opel Rekord

  • 1.7 —1698 cc (1698 L)
  • 1.9 —1897 cc (1897 L)
  • 1.7 S —1698 cc (1698 L)
  • 2.0 —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 1.9 S —1897 cc (1897 L)
  • 2.0 D —1998 cc (1998 L)
  • 2.1 D —2068 cc (2068 L)

    1972 Opel Rekord Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.7 —25.7 cc/hp (34.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 —21.1 cc/hp (28.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.7 S —20.5 cc/hp (27.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —19.8 cc/hp (26.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 S —19.6 cc/hp (26.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 D —36.3 cc/hp (50 cc/kW)
  • 2.1 D —34.5 cc/hp (47 cc/kW)

    1972 Opel Rekord Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.7 —27.62 or 648 cc smaller
  • 1.9 —19.14 or 449 cc smaller
  • 1.7 S —27.62 or 648 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 1.9 S —19.14 or 449 cc smaller
  • 2.0 D —14.83 or 348 cc smaller
  • 2.1 D —11.85 or 278 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.7 1.7 L
    (1698 cc)     		27.6% smaller 74 cc to 1 mpg 39 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 1.9 L
    (1897 cc)     		19.1% smaller 95 cc to 1 mpg 47 hp from 1 L 172 cc to 100 kg
    1.7 S 1.7 L
    (1698 cc)     		27.6% smaller 77 cc to 1 mpg 49 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller 94 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 180 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 S 1.9 L
    (1897 cc)     		19.1% smaller 95 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 172 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 D 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller 67 cc to 1 mpg 28 hp from 1 L 167 cc to 100 kg
    2.1 D 2.07 L
    (2068 cc)     		11.8% smaller 71 cc to 1 mpg 29 hp from 1 L 172 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.7
    Precise engine size 1.7 L (1698 cc)
    Difference from world average 27.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 74 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 39 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9
    Precise engine size 1.9 L (1897 cc)
    Difference from world average 19.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 95 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 47 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 172 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.7 S
    Precise engine size 1.7 L (1698 cc)
    Difference from world average 27.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 77 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 49 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 94 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 180 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 S
    Precise engine size 1.9 L (1897 cc)
    Difference from world average 19.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 95 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 172 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 D
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 67 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 28 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 167 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.1 D
    Precise engine size 2.07 L (2068 cc)
    Difference from world average 11.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 71 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 29 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 172 cc to 100 kg

    Opel Rekord 1972

    1972 Rekord D Coupe

    Quick notes on Opel Rekord engine size

      • Average size for generation: 1.87 L (1868 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.7 L (1698 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1979 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.48 L smaller (-478 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 20 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 374 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6514 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.44 L bigger (+1444 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 85 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1972 Opel Rekord

  • 1.7 S —1698 cc (1698 L)
  • 1.9 —1897 cc (1897 L)
  • 2.0 —1979 cc (1979 L)
  • 1.9 S —1897 cc (1897 L)

    1972 Opel Rekord Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.7 S —20.5 cc/hp (27.8 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 —21.1 cc/hp (28.7 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 —19.6 cc/hp (26.7 cc/kW)
  • 1.9 S —19.6 cc/hp (26.7 cc/kW)

    1972 Opel Rekord Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.7 S —27.62 or 648 cc smaller
  • 1.9 —19.14 or 449 cc smaller
  • 2.0 —15.64 or 367 cc smaller
  • 1.9 S —19.14 or 449 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.7 S 1.7 L
    (1698 cc)     		27.6% smaller 89 cc to 1 mpg 49 hp from 1 L 154 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 1.9 L
    (1897 cc)     		19.1% smaller 95 cc to 1 mpg 47 hp from 1 L 172 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 1.98 L
    (1979 cc)     		15.6% smaller 73 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 165 cc to 100 kg
    1.9 S 1.9 L
    (1897 cc)     		19.1% smaller 95 cc to 1 mpg 51 hp from 1 L 172 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.7 S
    Precise engine size 1.7 L (1698 cc)
    Difference from world average 27.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 89 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 49 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 154 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9
    Precise engine size 1.9 L (1897 cc)
    Difference from world average 19.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 95 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 47 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 172 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0
    Precise engine size 1.98 L (1979 cc)
    Difference from world average 15.6 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 73 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 165 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.9 S
    Precise engine size 1.9 L (1897 cc)
    Difference from world average 19.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 95 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 51 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 172 cc to 100 kg