Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 |
1.76 L (1762 cc) |
24.9% smaller | 57 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 160 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 D |
1.91 L (1905 cc) |
18.8% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 36 hp from 1 L | 173 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | - | 61 hp from 1 L | 182 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 TD |
1.91 L (1905 cc) |
18.8% smaller | 58 cc to 1 mpg | 47 hp from 1 L | 159 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 T 16 X4 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 98 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.76 L (1762 cc) |
Difference from world average | 24.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 57 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 D |
Precise engine size | 1.91 L (1905 cc) |
Difference from world average | 18.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 36 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 173 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 182 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 TD |
Precise engine size | 1.91 L (1905 cc) |
Difference from world average | 18.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 58 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 47 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 159 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 T 16 X4 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 98 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
1.59 L (1587 cc) |
32.4% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 56 hp from 1 L | 144 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1587 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 144 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 Sport MI-16 |
1.91 L (1905 cc) |
18.8% smaller | - | 83 hp from 1 L | 173 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 Sport MI-16 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.91 L (1905 cc) |
Difference from world average | 18.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 173 cc to 100 kg |