2020 Espace V (Phase I)
2015 Espace V
2012 Espace IV (Phase IV)
2012 Grand Espace IV (Phase IV)
2010 Espace IV (Phase III)
2010 Grand Espace IV (Phase III)
2006 Espace IV (Phase II)
2006 Grand Espace IV (Phase II)
2002 Espace IV
2002 Grand Espace IV
2000 Espace III (JE, Phase II)
2000 Grand Espace III (JE, Phase II)
1998 Grand Espace III (JE)
1996 Espace III (JE)
1991 Espace II (J63)
1988 Espace I (J11/13, Phase II 1988)
1984 Espace I (J11/13)
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8 TCe |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 58 cc to 1 mpg | 125 hp from 1 L | 106 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Blue dCi |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 45 cc to 1 mpg | 100 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 TCe |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 58 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 125 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 106 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Blue dCi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 45 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 100 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 dCi |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 31 cc to 1 mpg | 100 hp from 1 L | 94 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 TCe |
1.62 L (1618 cc) |
31% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 123 hp from 1 L | 101 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 Energy TCe |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 51 cc to 1 mpg | 125 hp from 1 L | 112 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Blue dCi |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 45 cc to 1 mpg | 100 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 TCe |
1.8 L (1798 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 56 cc to 1 mpg | 125 hp from 1 L | 106 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 dCi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 31 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 100 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 94 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 TCe |
Precise engine size | 1.62 L (1618 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 123 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 101 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 Energy TCe |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 51 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 125 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 112 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Blue dCi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 45 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 100 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 TCe |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1798 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 56 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 125 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 106 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 dCi |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 87 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TCe |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 85 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 87 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TCe |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 dCi |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TCe |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 85 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TCe |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 TCe |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 85 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 dCi |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TCe |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 dCi |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TCe |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 85 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TCe |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 dCi |
1.87 L (1870 cc) |
20.3% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 104 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Turbo 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 85 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 dCi |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 dCi |
2.19 L (2188 cc) |
6.7% smaller | 84 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 109 cc to 100 kg |
3.5 V6 |
3.5 L (3498 cc) |
49.1% bigger | 175 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 194 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 dCi V6 |
2.96 L (2958 cc) |
26.1% bigger | 118 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 dCi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.87 L (1870 cc) |
Difference from world average | 20.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 104 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi |
Precise engine size | 2.19 L (2188 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 84 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 109 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.5 L (3498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 49.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 175 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 194 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 dCi V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.96 L (2958 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 118 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 dCi |
1.87 L (1870 cc) |
20.3% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 98 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TCe |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 85 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 dCi |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 62 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 105 cc to 100 kg |
3.5 V6 |
3.5 L (3498 cc) |
49.1% bigger | 184 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 184 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 dCi |
2.19 L (2188 cc) |
6.7% smaller | 84 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 109 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 dCi V6 |
2.96 L (2958 cc) |
26.1% bigger | 118 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 148 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 dCi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.87 L (1870 cc) |
Difference from world average | 20.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 98 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TCe |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 dCi |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 62 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 105 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.5 L (3498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 49.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 184 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 184 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi |
Precise engine size | 2.19 L (2188 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 84 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 109 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 dCi V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.96 L (2958 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 118 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 148 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i Turbo 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 91 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 dCi |
2.19 L (2188 cc) |
6.7% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 115 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 dCi |
1.87 L (1870 cc) |
20.3% smaller | 53 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 104 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 dCi |
2.96 L (2958 cc) |
26.1% bigger | 118 cc to 1 mpg | 60 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
3.5i V6 24V |
3.5 L (3498 cc) |
49.1% bigger | 184 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 194 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i Turbo 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 91 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi |
Precise engine size | 2.19 L (2188 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 115 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 dCi |
Precise engine size | 1.87 L (1870 cc) |
Difference from world average | 20.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 53 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 104 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 dCi |
Precise engine size | 2.96 L (2958 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 118 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 3.5 L (3498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 49.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 184 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 194 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i Turbo 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 91 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 111 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 dCi |
2.19 L (2188 cc) |
6.7% smaller | 84 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 115 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 dCi V6 |
2.96 L (2958 cc) |
26.1% bigger | 118 cc to 1 mpg | 60 hp from 1 L | 148 cc to 100 kg |
3.5 V6 |
3.5 L (3498 cc) |
49.1% bigger | 184 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 184 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 dCi |
1.87 L (1870 cc) |
20.3% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 104 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i Turbo 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 91 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 111 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi |
Precise engine size | 2.19 L (2188 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 84 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 115 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 dCi V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.96 L (2958 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 118 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 148 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.5 V6 |
Precise engine size | 3.5 L (3498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 49.1 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 184 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 184 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 dCi |
Precise engine size | 1.87 L (1870 cc) |
Difference from world average | 20.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 104 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.9 dTi |
1.87 L (1870 cc) |
20.3% smaller | 52 cc to 1 mpg | 52 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 dCi 16V |
2.19 L (2188 cc) |
6.7% smaller | 66 cc to 1 mpg | 59 hp from 1 L | 129 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 V6 24V |
2.95 L (2946 cc) |
25.6% bigger | 147 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 dCi |
2.19 L (2188 cc) |
6.7% smaller | 66 cc to 1 mpg | 59 hp from 1 L | 129 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 dTi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.87 L (1870 cc) |
Difference from world average | 20.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 52 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.19 L (2188 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 66 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 129 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.95 L (2946 cc) |
Difference from world average | 25.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 147 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi |
Precise engine size | 2.19 L (2188 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 66 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 129 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0 V6 24V |
2.95 L (2946 cc) |
25.6% bigger | 147 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 dCi 16V |
2.19 L (2188 cc) |
6.7% smaller | 66 cc to 1 mpg | 59 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.95 L (2946 cc) |
Difference from world average | 25.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 147 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 dCi 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.19 L (2188 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 66 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 V6 24V |
2.95 L (2946 cc) |
25.6% bigger | 147 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 173 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 TD 12V |
2.19 L (2188 cc) |
6.7% smaller | 73 cc to 1 mpg | 52 hp from 1 L | 129 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.95 L (2946 cc) |
Difference from world average | 25.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 147 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 173 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 TD 12V |
Precise engine size | 2.19 L (2188 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 73 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 129 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
1.9 dTi |
1.87 L (1870 cc) |
20.3% smaller | 52 cc to 1 mpg | 52 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i 16V |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 TD 12V |
2.19 L (2188 cc) |
6.7% smaller | 75 cc to 1 mpg | 52 hp from 1 L | 137 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 V6 24V |
2.95 L (2946 cc) |
25.6% bigger | 147 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 173 cc to 100 kg |
3.0 V6 |
2.96 L (2963 cc) |
26.3% bigger | 174 cc to 1 mpg | 56 hp from 1 L | 174 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.9 dTi |
Precise engine size | 1.87 L (1870 cc) |
Difference from world average | 20.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 52 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 TD 12V |
Precise engine size | 2.19 L (2188 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 75 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 137 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2.95 L (2946 cc) |
Difference from world average | 25.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 147 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 173 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0 V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.96 L (2963 cc) |
Difference from world average | 26.3 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 174 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 174 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 52 hp from 1 L | - |
2.1 TD |
2.07 L (2068 cc) |
11.8% smaller | - | 43 hp from 1 L | 148 cc to 100 kg |
2.2i |
2.17 L (2165 cc) |
7.7% smaller | 94 cc to 1 mpg | 49 hp from 1 L | 155 cc to 100 kg |
2.8 V6 |
2.85 L (2849 cc) |
21.4% bigger | 142 cc to 1 mpg | 53 hp from 1 L | 204 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.1 TD |
Precise engine size | 2.07 L (2068 cc) |
Difference from world average | 11.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 43 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 148 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2i |
Precise engine size | 2.17 L (2165 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 94 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 49 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 155 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.8 V6 |
Precise engine size | 2.85 L (2849 cc) |
Difference from world average | 21.4 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 142 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 53 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 204 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 GTS |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 52 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 60 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i TXE |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 60 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
2.1 TD |
2.07 L (2068 cc) |
11.8% smaller | - | 43 hp from 1 L | 148 cc to 100 kg |
2.2i TXE |
2.17 L (2165 cc) |
7.7% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 49 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
2.2i |
2.17 L (2165 cc) |
7.7% smaller | 90 cc to 1 mpg | 49 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GTS |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i TXE |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.1 TD |
Precise engine size | 2.07 L (2068 cc) |
Difference from world average | 11.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 43 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 148 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2i TXE |
Precise engine size | 2.17 L (2165 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 49 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2i |
Precise engine size | 2.17 L (2165 cc) |
Difference from world average | 7.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 90 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 49 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.1 TD |
2.07 L (2068 cc) |
11.8% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 43 hp from 1 L | 172 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 GTS |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 55 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.1 TD |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.07 L (2068 cc) |
Difference from world average | 11.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 43 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 172 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 GTS |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 55 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |