Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.9 TCe |
0.9 L (899 cc) |
61.7% smaller | 20 cc to 1 mpg | 100 hp from 1 L | 82 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 16V |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 64 hp from 1 L | 145 cc to 100 kg |
1.5 Blue dCi |
1.46 L (1461 cc) |
37.7% smaller | 22 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 0.9 TCe |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 0.9 L (899 cc) |
Difference from world average | 61.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 20 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 100 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 82 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 64 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 145 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 Blue dCi |
Precise engine size | 1.46 L (1461 cc) |
Difference from world average | 37.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 22 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 122 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.2 16V |
1.15 L (1149 cc) |
51% smaller | 29 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 115 cc to 100 kg |
0.9 TCe |
0.9 L (898 cc) |
61.7% smaller | 20 cc to 1 mpg | 100 hp from 1 L | 90 cc to 100 kg |
1.5 dCi |
1.46 L (1461 cc) |
37.7% smaller | 24 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.2 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.15 L (1149 cc) |
Difference from world average | 51 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 29 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 115 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 0.9 TCe |
Precise engine size | 0.9 L (898 cc) |
Difference from world average | 61.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 20 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 100 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 90 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Precise engine size | 1.46 L (1461 cc) |
Difference from world average | 37.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 24 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.5 dCi |
1.46 L (1461 cc) |
37.7% smaller | 27 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 146 cc to 100 kg |
1.4 16V |
1.39 L (1390 cc) |
40.8% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 126 cc to 100 kg |
1.2 16V |
1.15 L (1149 cc) |
51% smaller | 29 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 128 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 16V |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 46 cc to 1 mpg | 66 hp from 1 L | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.46 L (1461 cc) |
Difference from world average | 37.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 27 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.39 L (1390 cc) |
Difference from world average | 40.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 126 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.2 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.15 L (1149 cc) |
Difference from world average | 51 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 29 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 128 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 46 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 66 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 16v |
1.39 L (1390 cc) |
40.8% smaller | - | 71 hp from 1 L | 139 cc to 100 kg |
1.4 |
1.39 L (1390 cc) |
40.8% smaller | - | 54 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
1.5 dCi |
1.46 L (1461 cc) |
37.7% smaller | 28 cc to 1 mpg | 45 hp from 1 L | 146 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4 16v |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.39 L (1390 cc) |
Difference from world average | 40.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 139 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4 |
Precise engine size | 1.39 L (1390 cc) |
Difference from world average | 40.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 54 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 dCi |
Precise engine size | 1.46 L (1461 cc) |
Difference from world average | 37.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 28 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 45 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 146 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 160 cc to 100 kg |