Rover 25 Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Choose Generation

Average Engine Size Rover 25

Rover 25 2002

2000 25 (RF)

Quick notes on Rover 25 engine size

    • Average size for generation: 1.58 L (1578 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 1.1 L (1119 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1994 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.77 L smaller (-768 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 15 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 316 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.8 L smaller (-6804 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.15 L bigger (+1154 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 98 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 4 / 10

2002 Rover 25

  • 1.4 i 16V —1396 cc (1396 L)
  • 1.1 i 16V —1119 cc (1119 L)
  • 1.6 i 16V —1588 cc (1588 L)
  • 1.8 i 16V —1795 cc (1795 L)
  • 2.0 TD —1994 cc (1994 L)

    2002 Rover 25 Engine size to power ratio

  • 1.4 i 16V —16.6 cc/hp (22.5 cc/kW)
  • 1.1 i 16V —14.9 cc/hp (20.3 cc/kW)
  • 1.6 i 16V —14.6 cc/hp (19.9 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 i 16V —12.4 cc/hp (16.8 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 TD —17.6 cc/hp (24 cc/kW)

    2002 Rover 25 Difference from world average engine size

  • 1.4 i 16V —40.49 or 950 cc smaller
  • 1.1 i 16V —52.3 or 1227 cc smaller
  • 1.6 i 16V —32.31 or 758 cc smaller
  • 1.8 i 16V —23.49 or 551 cc smaller
  • 2.0 TD —15 or 352 cc smaller
  • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    1.4 i 16V 1.4 L
    (1396 cc)
    40.5% smaller 38 cc to 1 mpg 60 hp from 1 L 127 cc to 100 kg
    1.1 i 16V 1.12 L
    (1119 cc)
    52.3% smaller - 67 hp from 1 L 112 cc to 100 kg
    1.6 i 16V 1.59 L
    (1588 cc)
    32.3% smaller 45 cc to 1 mpg 69 hp from 1 L 144 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 i 16V 1.8 L
    (1795 cc)
    23.5% smaller 58 cc to 1 mpg 81 hp from 1 L 163 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 TD 1.99 L
    (1994 cc)
    15% smaller 55 cc to 1 mpg 57 hp from 1 L 181 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.4 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.4 L (1396 cc)
    Difference from world average 40.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 38 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 60 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 127 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.1 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.12 L (1119 cc)
    Difference from world average 52.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 67 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 112 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.6 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.59 L (1588 cc)
    Difference from world average 32.3 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 45 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 69 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 144 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 i 16V
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1795 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.5 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 58 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 81 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 163 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 TD
    Precise engine size 1.99 L (1994 cc)
    Difference from world average 15 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 55 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 57 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 181 cc to 100 kg