Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.4 i 16V |
1.4 L (1396 cc) |
40.5% smaller | 38 cc to 1 mpg | 60 hp from 1 L | 127 cc to 100 kg |
1.1 i 16V |
1.12 L (1119 cc) |
52.3% smaller | - | 67 hp from 1 L | 112 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V |
1.59 L (1588 cc) |
32.3% smaller | 45 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 144 cc to 100 kg |
1.8 i 16V |
1.8 L (1795 cc) |
23.5% smaller | 58 cc to 1 mpg | 81 hp from 1 L | 163 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TD |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 181 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4 i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.4 L (1396 cc) |
Difference from world average | 40.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 38 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 60 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 127 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.1 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.12 L (1119 cc) |
Difference from world average | 52.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 112 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1588 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 45 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 144 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1795 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 58 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 81 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 163 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 181 cc to 100 kg |