Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i 16V |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
1.4 i 16V |
1.4 L (1396 cc) |
40.5% smaller | 41 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 116 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V |
1.59 L (1588 cc) |
32.3% smaller | 47 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i V6 24V |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TD |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 57 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.4 L (1396 cc) |
Difference from world average | 40.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 41 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 116 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1588 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 47 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.8i 16V |
1.8 L (1796 cc) |
23.4% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 65 hp from 1 L | 150 cc to 100 kg |
1.4 i 16V |
1.4 L (1396 cc) |
40.5% smaller | 41 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 116 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 i V6 24V |
2 L (1997 cc) |
14.9% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TD |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 57 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 i 16V |
1.59 L (1588 cc) |
32.3% smaller | 47 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 132 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.8 L (1796 cc) |
Difference from world average | 23.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 150 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.4 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.4 L (1396 cc) |
Difference from world average | 40.5 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 41 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 116 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 i V6 24V |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1997 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.59 L (1588 cc) |
Difference from world average | 32.3 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 47 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 132 cc to 100 kg |