cat_logo
HomeRover

75

Rover 75 Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Choose Generation

Average Engine Size Rover 75

Rover 75 2001

2001 75 Tourer

Quick notes on Rover 75 engine size

    • Average size for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2497 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.35 L smaller (-348 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 400 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6384 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.57 L bigger (+1574 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 114 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2001 Rover 75

  • 2.5 V6 —2497 cc (2497 L)
  • 1.8 —1796 cc (1796 L)
  • 1.8 16V T —1796 cc (1796 L)
  • 2.0 CDT —1951 cc (1951 L)
  • 2.0 CDTi —1951 cc (1951 L)
  • 2.0 V6 —1997 cc (1997 L)

    2001 Rover 75 Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.5 V6 —14.1 cc/hp (19.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 —15 cc/hp (20.4 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 16V T —12 cc/hp (16.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 CDT —17 cc/hp (23 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 CDTi —14.9 cc/hp (20.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 V6 —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)

    2001 Rover 75 Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.5 V6 —6.44 or 151 cc bigger
  • 1.8 —23.44 or 550 cc smaller
  • 1.8 16V T —23.44 or 550 cc smaller
  • 2.0 CDT —16.84 or 395 cc smaller
  • 2.0 CDTi —16.84 or 395 cc smaller
  • 2.0 V6 —14.88 or 349 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.5 V6 2.5 L
    (2497 cc)     		6.4% bigger 100 cc to 1 mpg 71 hp from 1 L 166 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)     		23.4% smaller 60 cc to 1 mpg 67 hp from 1 L 120 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 16V T 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)     		23.4% smaller - 83 hp from 1 L 120 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 CDT 1.95 L
    (1951 cc)     		16.8% smaller 46 cc to 1 mpg 59 hp from 1 L 130 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 CDTi 1.95 L
    (1951 cc)     		16.8% smaller - 67 hp from 1 L 122 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 V6 2 L
    (1997 cc)     		14.9% smaller 80 cc to 1 mpg 75 hp from 1 L 133 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 V6
    Precise engine size 2.5 L (2497 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.4 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 100 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 71 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 166 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 60 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 67 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 120 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 16V T
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 83 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 120 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 CDT
    Precise engine size 1.95 L (1951 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 46 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 59 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 130 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 CDTi
    Precise engine size 1.95 L (1951 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 67 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 122 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 V6
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 80 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 133 cc to 100 kg

    Rover 75 1999

    1999 75 (RJ)

    Quick notes on Rover 75 engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1796 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.5 L (2497 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.35 L smaller (-348 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 14 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 400 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6384 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.57 L bigger (+1574 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 114 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    1999 Rover 75

  • 2.0 V6 —1997 cc (1997 L)
  • 1.8 —1796 cc (1796 L)
  • 2.5 V6 —2497 cc (2497 L)
  • 1.8 16V T —1796 cc (1796 L)
  • 2.0 CDTi —1951 cc (1951 L)
  • 2.0 CDT —1951 cc (1951 L)

    1999 Rover 75 Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.0 V6 —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 —15 cc/hp (20.4 cc/kW)
  • 2.5 V6 —14.1 cc/hp (19.2 cc/kW)
  • 1.8 16V T —12 cc/hp (16.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 CDTi —14.9 cc/hp (20.3 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 CDT —17 cc/hp (23 cc/kW)

    1999 Rover 75 Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.0 V6 —14.88 or 349 cc smaller
  • 1.8 —23.44 or 550 cc smaller
  • 2.5 V6 —6.44 or 151 cc bigger
  • 1.8 16V T —23.44 or 550 cc smaller
  • 2.0 CDTi —16.84 or 395 cc smaller
  • 2.0 CDT —16.84 or 395 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.0 V6 2 L
    (1997 cc)     		14.9% smaller 80 cc to 1 mpg 75 hp from 1 L 143 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)     		23.4% smaller 60 cc to 1 mpg 67 hp from 1 L 128 cc to 100 kg
    2.5 V6 2.5 L
    (2497 cc)     		6.4% bigger 100 cc to 1 mpg 71 hp from 1 L 178 cc to 100 kg
    1.8 16V T 1.8 L
    (1796 cc)     		23.4% smaller - 83 hp from 1 L 128 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 CDTi 1.95 L
    (1951 cc)     		16.8% smaller - 67 hp from 1 L 130 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 CDT 1.95 L
    (1951 cc)     		16.8% smaller 50 cc to 1 mpg 59 hp from 1 L 130 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 V6
    Precise engine size 2 L (1997 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 80 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 75 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 143 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 60 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 67 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 128 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.5 V6
    Precise engine size 2.5 L (2497 cc)
    Difference from world average 6.4 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 100 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 71 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 178 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 1.8 16V T
    Precise engine size 1.8 L (1796 cc)
    Difference from world average 23.4 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 83 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 128 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 CDTi
    Precise engine size 1.95 L (1951 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 67 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 130 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 CDT
    Precise engine size 1.95 L (1951 cc)
    Difference from world average 16.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 50 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 59 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 130 cc to 100 kg