Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 |
1.28 L (1275 cc) |
45.7% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 54 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TD |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 52 cc to 1 mpg | 30 hp from 1 L | 181 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 54 hp from 1 L | 160 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.3 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.28 L (1275 cc) |
Difference from world average | 45.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 54 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 52 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 30 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 181 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 54 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 160 cc to 100 kg |