Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.3 |
1.28 L (1275 cc) |
45.7% smaller | 36 cc to 1 mpg | 54 hp from 1 L | 116 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 |
1.6 L (1598 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 46 cc to 1 mpg | 54 hp from 1 L | 145 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 52 hp from 1 L | - |
2.0 i |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 181 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 TD |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 46 cc to 1 mpg | 41 hp from 1 L | 181 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.3 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.28 L (1275 cc) |
Difference from world average | 45.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 36 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 54 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 116 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1598 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 46 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 54 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 145 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 52 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 i |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 181 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 TD |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 46 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 41 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 181 cc to 100 kg |