[1998 - 2014] Saab 9-3 Engine Sizes – Cool Informative Charts

Quick notes on Saab 9-3 engine size

- Average size for generation: 2.12 L (2121 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1796 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2.8 L (2792 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.23 L smaller (-225 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 10 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 424 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6261 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.7 L bigger (+1697 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 158 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2008 Saab 9-3

1.8 t Biopower —1796 cc (1796 L)

1.9 TTiD —1910 cc (1910 L)

2.0 t Biopower —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.8 i V6 24V —2792 cc (2792 L)

2008 Saab 9-3 Engine size to power ratio

1.8 t Biopower —10.3 cc/hp (13.9 cc/kW)

1.9 TTiD —10.6 cc/hp (14.5 cc/kW)

2.0 t Biopower —9.9 cc/hp (13.5 cc/kW)

2.8 i V6 24V —10 cc/hp (13.6 cc/kW)

2008 Saab 9-3 Difference from world average engine size

1.8 t Biopower —23.44 or 550 cc smaller

1.9 TTiD —18.58 or 436 cc smaller

2.0 t Biopower —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

2.8 i V6 24V —19.01 or 446 cc bigger

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
1.8 t Biopower	1.8 L (1796 cc)	23.4% smaller	75 cc to 1 mpg	97 hp from 1 L	128 cc to 100 kg
1.9 TTiD	1.91 L (1910 cc)	18.6% smaller	45 cc to 1 mpg	94 hp from 1 L	127 cc to 100 kg
2.0 t Biopower	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	86 cc to 1 mpg	101 hp from 1 L	142 cc to 100 kg
2.8 i V6 24V	2.79 L (2792 cc)	19% bigger	133 cc to 1 mpg	100 hp from 1 L	175 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	1.8 t Biopower
Precise engine size	1.8 L (1796 cc)
Difference from world average	23.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	75 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	97 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	128 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.9 TTiD
Precise engine size	1.91 L (1910 cc)
Difference from world average	18.6 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	45 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	94 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	127 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 t Biopower
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	86 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	101 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	142 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.8 i V6 24V
Precise engine size	2.79 L (2792 cc)
Difference from world average	19 bigger
Engine size to consumption ratio	133 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	100 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	175 cc to 100 kg

Quick notes on Saab 9-3 engine size

- Average size for generation: 2.1 L (2095 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1797 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2.8 L (2792 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.25 L smaller (-251 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 12 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 419 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6287 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.67 L bigger (+1671 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 131 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2005 Saab 9-3

1.8 i 16V —1797 cc (1797 L)

1.9 TiD —1910 cc (1910 L)

2.0 i 16V t —1998 cc (1998 L)

2.0 t —1998 cc (1998 L)

2.0 T —1998 cc (1998 L)

2.2 TiD —2171 cc (2171 L)

2.8 i V6 24V —2792 cc (2792 L)

2005 Saab 9-3 Engine size to power ratio

1.8 i 16V —14.7 cc/hp (20 cc/kW)

1.9 TiD —12.7 cc/hp (17.4 cc/kW)

2.0 i 16V t —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)

2.0 t —11.4 cc/hp (15.5 cc/kW)

2.0 T —9.5 cc/hp (13 cc/kW)

2.2 TiD —17.4 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)

2.8 i V6 24V —11.2 cc/hp (15.2 cc/kW)

2005 Saab 9-3 Difference from world average engine size

1.8 i 16V —23.4 or 549 cc smaller

1.9 TiD —18.58 or 436 cc smaller

2.0 i 16V t —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

2.0 t —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

2.0 T —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

2.2 TiD —7.46 or 175 cc smaller

2.8 i V6 24V —19.01 or 446 cc bigger

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
1.8 i 16V	1.8 L (1797 cc)	23.4% smaller	-	68 hp from 1 L	128 cc to 100 kg
1.9 TiD	1.91 L (1910 cc)	18.6% smaller	-	79 hp from 1 L	127 cc to 100 kg
2.0 i 16V t	2 L (1998 cc)	14.8% smaller	83 cc to 1 mpg	75 hp from 1 L	143 cc to 100 kg
2.0 t	2 L (1998 cc)	14.8% smaller	80 cc to 1 mpg	88 hp from 1 L	133 cc to 100 kg
2.0 T	2 L (1998 cc)	14.8% smaller	80 cc to 1 mpg	105 hp from 1 L	133 cc to 100 kg
2.2 TiD	2.17 L (2171 cc)	7.5% smaller	59 cc to 1 mpg	58 hp from 1 L	136 cc to 100 kg
2.8 i V6 24V	2.79 L (2792 cc)	19% bigger	-	90 hp from 1 L	175 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	1.8 i 16V
Precise engine size	1.8 L (1797 cc)
Difference from world average	23.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	68 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	128 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.9 TiD
Precise engine size	1.91 L (1910 cc)
Difference from world average	18.6 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	79 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	127 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 i 16V t
Precise engine size	2 L (1998 cc)
Difference from world average	14.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	83 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	75 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	143 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 t
Precise engine size	2 L (1998 cc)
Difference from world average	14.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	80 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	88 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	133 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 T
Precise engine size	2 L (1998 cc)
Difference from world average	14.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	80 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	105 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	133 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.2 TiD
Precise engine size	2.17 L (2171 cc)
Difference from world average	7.5 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	59 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	58 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	136 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.8 i V6 24V
Precise engine size	2.79 L (2792 cc)
Difference from world average	19 bigger
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	90 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	175 cc to 100 kg

Quick notes on Saab 9-3 engine size

- Average size for generation: 2.13 L (2131 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 1.8 L (1796 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2.8 L (2792 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.22 L smaller (-215 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 11 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 426 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6251 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.71 L bigger (+1707 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 147 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2005 Saab 9-3

1.8 i 16V —1998 cc (1998 L)

1.9 TiD —1910 cc (1910 L)

1.8 i 16V Bio —1796 cc (1796 L)

1.9 TTiD —1910 cc (1910 L)

2.0 i 16V Bio —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.0 i 16V t —1998 cc (1998 L)

2.0 i 16V T —1998 cc (1998 L)

2.8 i V6 —2792 cc (2792 L)

2.8 i V6 24V —2792 cc (2792 L)

2005 Saab 9-3 Engine size to power ratio

1.8 i 16V —13.3 cc/hp (18.2 cc/kW)

1.9 TiD —12.7 cc/hp (17.4 cc/kW)

1.8 i 16V Bio —10.3 cc/hp (13.9 cc/kW)

1.9 TTiD —10.6 cc/hp (14.5 cc/kW)

2.0 i 16V Bio —9.9 cc/hp (13.5 cc/kW)

2.0 i 16V t —11.4 cc/hp (15.5 cc/kW)

2.0 i 16V T —9.5 cc/hp (12.9 cc/kW)

2.8 i V6 —10 cc/hp (13.6 cc/kW)

2.8 i V6 24V —11.2 cc/hp (15.2 cc/kW)

2005 Saab 9-3 Difference from world average engine size

1.8 i 16V —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

1.9 TiD —18.58 or 436 cc smaller

1.8 i 16V Bio —23.44 or 550 cc smaller

1.9 TTiD —18.58 or 436 cc smaller

2.0 i 16V Bio —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

2.0 i 16V t —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

2.0 i 16V T —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

2.8 i V6 —19.01 or 446 cc bigger

2.8 i V6 24V —19.01 or 446 cc bigger

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
1.8 i 16V	2 L (1998 cc)	14.8% smaller	77 cc to 1 mpg	75 hp from 1 L	143 cc to 100 kg
1.9 TiD	1.91 L (1910 cc)	18.6% smaller	-	79 hp from 1 L	127 cc to 100 kg
1.8 i 16V Bio	1.8 L (1796 cc)	23.4% smaller	90 cc to 1 mpg	97 hp from 1 L	128 cc to 100 kg
1.9 TTiD	1.91 L (1910 cc)	18.6% smaller	56 cc to 1 mpg	94 hp from 1 L	127 cc to 100 kg
2.0 i 16V Bio	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	104 cc to 1 mpg	101 hp from 1 L	132 cc to 100 kg
2.0 i 16V t	2 L (1998 cc)	14.8% smaller	83 cc to 1 mpg	88 hp from 1 L	133 cc to 100 kg
2.0 i 16V T	2 L (1998 cc)	14.8% smaller	77 cc to 1 mpg	106 hp from 1 L	133 cc to 100 kg
2.8 i V6	2.79 L (2792 cc)	19% bigger	140 cc to 1 mpg	100 hp from 1 L	175 cc to 100 kg
2.8 i V6 24V	2.79 L (2792 cc)	19% bigger	133 cc to 1 mpg	90 hp from 1 L	175 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	1.8 i 16V
Precise engine size	2 L (1998 cc)
Difference from world average	14.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	77 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	75 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	143 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.9 TiD
Precise engine size	1.91 L (1910 cc)
Difference from world average	18.6 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	79 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	127 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.8 i 16V Bio
Precise engine size	1.8 L (1796 cc)
Difference from world average	23.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	90 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	97 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	128 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.9 TTiD
Precise engine size	1.91 L (1910 cc)
Difference from world average	18.6 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	56 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	94 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	127 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 i 16V Bio
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	104 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	101 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	132 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 i 16V t
Precise engine size	2 L (1998 cc)
Difference from world average	14.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	83 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	88 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	133 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 i 16V T
Precise engine size	2 L (1998 cc)
Difference from world average	14.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	77 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	106 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	133 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.8 i V6
Precise engine size	2.79 L (2792 cc)
Difference from world average	19 bigger
Engine size to consumption ratio	140 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	100 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	175 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.8 i V6 24V
Precise engine size	2.79 L (2792 cc)
Difference from world average	19 bigger
Engine size to consumption ratio	133 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	90 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	175 cc to 100 kg

Quick notes on Saab 9-3 engine size

- Average size for generation: 2.26 L (2263 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2.8 L (2792 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.08 L smaller (-83 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 11 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 566 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.1 L smaller (-6119 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.84 L bigger (+1839 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 135 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2004 Saab 9-3

2.0 t —1998 cc (1998 L)

2.0 T —1998 cc (1998 L)

2.8 V6 Turbo —2792 cc (2792 L)

2004 Saab 9-3 Engine size to power ratio

2.0 t —11.4 cc/hp (15.5 cc/kW)

2.0 T —9.5 cc/hp (13 cc/kW)

2.8 V6 Turbo —11.2 cc/hp (15.2 cc/kW)

2004 Saab 9-3 Difference from world average engine size

2.0 t —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

2.0 T —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

2.8 V6 Turbo —19.01 or 446 cc bigger

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
2.0 t	2 L (1998 cc)	14.8% smaller	83 cc to 1 mpg	88 hp from 1 L	125 cc to 100 kg
2.0 T	2 L (1998 cc)	14.8% smaller	77 cc to 1 mpg	105 hp from 1 L	125 cc to 100 kg
2.8 V6 Turbo	2.79 L (2792 cc)	19% bigger	127 cc to 1 mpg	90 hp from 1 L	-

Vehicle	2.0 t
Precise engine size	2 L (1998 cc)
Difference from world average	14.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	83 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	88 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	125 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 T
Precise engine size	2 L (1998 cc)
Difference from world average	14.8 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	77 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	105 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	125 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.8 V6 Turbo
Precise engine size	2.79 L (2792 cc)
Difference from world average	19 bigger
Engine size to consumption ratio	127 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	90 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	-

Quick notes on Saab 9-3 engine size

- Average size for generation: 2.1 L (2095 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1985 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2.3 L (2290 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.25 L smaller (-251 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 12 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 419 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6287 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.67 L bigger (+1671 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 119 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2000 Saab 9-3

2.0 T —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.0i —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.0i SE —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.0 i T —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.0 i T SE —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.0 i TS —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.2 TiD —2171 cc (2171 L)

2.3 i T SE —2290 cc (2290 L)

2.3 i —2290 cc (2290 L)

2.3 T —2290 cc (2290 L)

2000 Saab 9-3 Engine size to power ratio

2.0 T —9.7 cc/hp (13.1 cc/kW)

2.0i —15.3 cc/hp (20.7 cc/kW)

2.0i SE —15.3 cc/hp (20.7 cc/kW)

2.0 i T —10.7 cc/hp (14.6 cc/kW)

2.0 i T SE —10.7 cc/hp (14.6 cc/kW)

2.0 i TS —9.9 cc/hp (13.5 cc/kW)

2.2 TiD —17.4 cc/hp (23.6 cc/kW)

2.3 i T SE —15.3 cc/hp (20.8 cc/kW)

2.3 i —15.3 cc/hp (20.8 cc/kW)

2.3 T —10 cc/hp (13.6 cc/kW)

2000 Saab 9-3 Difference from world average engine size

2.0 T —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

2.0i —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

2.0i SE —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

2.0 i T —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

2.0 i T SE —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

2.0 i TS —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

2.2 TiD —7.46 or 175 cc smaller

2.3 i T SE —2.39 or 56 cc smaller

2.3 i —2.39 or 56 cc smaller

2.3 T —2.39 or 56 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
2.0 T	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	-	103 hp from 1 L	142 cc to 100 kg
2.0i	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	-	65 hp from 1 L	153 cc to 100 kg
2.0i SE	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	-	65 hp from 1 L	153 cc to 100 kg
2.0 i T	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	-	93 hp from 1 L	142 cc to 100 kg
2.0 i T SE	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	-	93 hp from 1 L	142 cc to 100 kg
2.0 i TS	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	-	101 hp from 1 L	142 cc to 100 kg
2.2 TiD	2.17 L (2171 cc)	7.5% smaller	59 cc to 1 mpg	58 hp from 1 L	136 cc to 100 kg
2.3 i T SE	2.29 L (2290 cc)	2.4% smaller	-	66 hp from 1 L	164 cc to 100 kg
2.3 i	2.29 L (2290 cc)	2.4% smaller	-	66 hp from 1 L	176 cc to 100 kg
2.3 T	2.29 L (2290 cc)	2.4% smaller	-	100 hp from 1 L	164 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	2.0 T
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	103 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	142 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0i
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	65 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	153 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0i SE
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	65 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	153 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 i T
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	93 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	142 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 i T SE
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	93 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	142 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 i TS
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	101 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	142 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.2 TiD
Precise engine size	2.17 L (2171 cc)
Difference from world average	7.5 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	59 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	58 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	136 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.3 i T SE
Precise engine size	2.29 L (2290 cc)
Difference from world average	2.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	66 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	164 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.3 i
Precise engine size	2.29 L (2290 cc)
Difference from world average	2.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	66 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	176 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.3 T
Precise engine size	2.29 L (2290 cc)
Difference from world average	2.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	100 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	164 cc to 100 kg

Quick notes on Saab 9-3 engine size

- Average size for generation: 2.21 L (2214 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1985 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2.3 L (2290 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.13 L smaller (-132 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 12 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 554 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.2 L smaller (-6168 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.79 L bigger (+1790 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 119 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

1998 Saab 9-3

2.0 T —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.3 T —2290 cc (2290 L)

2.3i —2290 cc (2290 L)

2.3 i SE —2290 cc (2290 L)

1998 Saab 9-3 Engine size to power ratio

2.0 T —9.7 cc/hp (13.1 cc/kW)

2.3 T —10 cc/hp (13.6 cc/kW)

2.3i —15.3 cc/hp (20.8 cc/kW)

2.3 i SE —15.3 cc/hp (20.8 cc/kW)

1998 Saab 9-3 Difference from world average engine size

2.0 T —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

2.3 T —2.39 or 56 cc smaller

2.3i —2.39 or 56 cc smaller

2.3 i SE —2.39 or 56 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
2.0 T	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	-	103 hp from 1 L	142 cc to 100 kg
2.3 T	2.29 L (2290 cc)	2.4% smaller	-	100 hp from 1 L	153 cc to 100 kg
2.3i	2.29 L (2290 cc)	2.4% smaller	-	66 hp from 1 L	164 cc to 100 kg
2.3 i SE	2.29 L (2290 cc)	2.4% smaller	-	66 hp from 1 L	143 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	2.0 T
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	103 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	142 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.3 T
Precise engine size	2.29 L (2290 cc)
Difference from world average	2.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	100 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	153 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.3i
Precise engine size	2.29 L (2290 cc)
Difference from world average	2.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	66 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	164 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.3 i SE
Precise engine size	2.29 L (2290 cc)
Difference from world average	2.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	66 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	143 cc to 100 kg

Saab 9-3 Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Choose Generation

Average Engine Size Saab 9-3

Saab 9-3 2008

Quick notes on Saab 9-3 engine size

2008 Saab 9-3

2008 Saab 9-3 Engine size to power ratio

2008 Saab 9-3 Difference from world average engine size

Saab 9-3 2005

Quick notes on Saab 9-3 engine size

2005 Saab 9-3

2005 Saab 9-3 Engine size to power ratio

2005 Saab 9-3 Difference from world average engine size

Saab 9-3 2005

Quick notes on Saab 9-3 engine size

2005 Saab 9-3

2005 Saab 9-3 Engine size to power ratio

2005 Saab 9-3 Difference from world average engine size

Saab 9-3 2004

Quick notes on Saab 9-3 engine size

2004 Saab 9-3

2004 Saab 9-3 Engine size to power ratio

2004 Saab 9-3 Difference from world average engine size

Saab 9-3 2000

Quick notes on Saab 9-3 engine size

2000 Saab 9-3

2000 Saab 9-3 Engine size to power ratio

2000 Saab 9-3 Difference from world average engine size

Saab 9-3 1998

Quick notes on Saab 9-3 engine size

1998 Saab 9-3

1998 Saab 9-3 Engine size to power ratio

1998 Saab 9-3 Difference from world average engine size