Saab 9000 Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Choose Generation

1985 9000 Hatchback
1986 9000

Average Engine Size Saab 9000

Saab 9000 1994

Quick notes on Saab 9000 engine size

- Average size for generation: 2.3 L (2299 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1985 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 3 L (2962 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.05 L smaller (-47 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 13 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 460 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.1 L smaller (-6083 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.88 L bigger (+1875 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 113 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

1994 Saab 9000

2.0 - 16 CS —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.0 - 16 ND Turbo —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.3 - 16 CSE —2290 cc (2290 L)

2.3 - 16 CSE Eco Power —2290 cc (2290 L)

2.3 - 16 Turbo CSE —2290 cc (2290 L)

2.3 CS Aero —2290 cc (2290 L)

3.0 - 24 V6 CS/CSE —2962 cc (2962 L)

1994 Saab 9000 Engine size to power ratio

2.0 - 16 CS —15.2 cc/hp (20.7 cc/kW)

2.0 - 16 ND Turbo —13.2 cc/hp (18 cc/kW)

2.3 - 16 CSE —15.6 cc/hp (21.2 cc/kW)

2.3 - 16 CSE Eco Power —13.5 cc/hp (18.3 cc/kW)

2.3 - 16 Turbo CSE —11.5 cc/hp (15.6 cc/kW)

2.3 CS Aero —10.2 cc/hp (13.9 cc/kW)

3.0 - 24 V6 CS/CSE —14 cc/hp (19.1 cc/kW)

1994 Saab 9000 Difference from world average engine size

2.0 - 16 CS —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

2.0 - 16 ND Turbo —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

2.3 - 16 CSE —2.39 or 56 cc smaller

2.3 - 16 CSE Eco Power —2.39 or 56 cc smaller

2.3 - 16 Turbo CSE —2.39 or 56 cc smaller

2.3 CS Aero —2.39 or 56 cc smaller

3.0 - 24 V6 CS/CSE —26.26 or 616 cc bigger

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
2.0 - 16 CS	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	76 cc to 1 mpg	66 hp from 1 L	142 cc to 100 kg
2.0 - 16 ND Turbo	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	74 cc to 1 mpg	75 hp from 1 L	142 cc to 100 kg
2.3 - 16 CSE	2.29 L (2290 cc)	2.4% smaller	88 cc to 1 mpg	64 hp from 1 L	164 cc to 100 kg
2.3 - 16 CSE Eco Power	2.29 L (2290 cc)	2.4% smaller	85 cc to 1 mpg	74 hp from 1 L	164 cc to 100 kg
2.3 - 16 Turbo CSE	2.29 L (2290 cc)	2.4% smaller	88 cc to 1 mpg	87 hp from 1 L	164 cc to 100 kg
2.3 CS Aero	2.29 L (2290 cc)	2.4% smaller	85 cc to 1 mpg	98 hp from 1 L	164 cc to 100 kg
3.0 - 24 V6 CS/CSE	2.96 L (2962 cc)	26.3% bigger	118 cc to 1 mpg	71 hp from 1 L	-

Vehicle	2.0 - 16 CS
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	76 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	66 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	142 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 - 16 ND Turbo
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	74 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	75 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	142 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.3 - 16 CSE
Precise engine size	2.29 L (2290 cc)
Difference from world average	2.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	88 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	64 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	164 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.3 - 16 CSE Eco Power
Precise engine size	2.29 L (2290 cc)
Difference from world average	2.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	85 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	74 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	164 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.3 - 16 Turbo CSE
Precise engine size	2.29 L (2290 cc)
Difference from world average	2.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	88 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	87 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	164 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.3 CS Aero
Precise engine size	2.29 L (2290 cc)
Difference from world average	2.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	85 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	98 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	164 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	3.0 - 24 V6 CS/CSE
Precise engine size	2.96 L (2962 cc)
Difference from world average	26.3 bigger
Engine size to consumption ratio	118 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	71 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	-

Saab 9000 1990

Quick notes on Saab 9000 engine size

- Average size for generation: 2.19 L (2194 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1985 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 3 L (2962 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.15 L smaller (-152 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 13 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 439 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.2 L smaller (-6188 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.77 L bigger (+1770 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 116 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

1990 Saab 9000

2.3 -16 Turbo —2290 cc (2290 L)

2.0 16V —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.0 - 16 Turbo CD —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.0 - 16 Turbo —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.3 - 16 —2290 cc (2290 L)

2.0 - 16 CD —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.0 -16 Turbo —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.0 -16 Turbo CD —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.3 - 16 CDE —2290 cc (2290 L)

2.3 - 16 CDE Turbo —2290 cc (2290 L)

3.0 - 24 V6 CD/CDE —2962 cc (2962 L)

2.3 - 16 CDE Eco-Power —2290 cc (2290 L)

1990 Saab 9000 Engine size to power ratio

2.3 -16 Turbo —11.7 cc/hp (16 cc/kW)

2.0 16V —15.5 cc/hp (21.1 cc/kW)

2.0 - 16 Turbo CD —12.2 cc/hp (16.5 cc/kW)

2.0 - 16 Turbo —11.3 cc/hp (15.4 cc/kW)

2.3 - 16 —15.7 cc/hp (21.4 cc/kW)

2.0 - 16 CD —13.2 cc/hp (18 cc/kW)

2.0 -16 Turbo —11.3 cc/hp (15.4 cc/kW)

2.0 -16 Turbo CD —10.7 cc/hp (14.6 cc/kW)

2.3 - 16 CDE —15.6 cc/hp (21.2 cc/kW)

2.3 - 16 CDE Turbo —11.5 cc/hp (15.6 cc/kW)

3.0 - 24 V6 CD/CDE —14 cc/hp (19.1 cc/kW)

2.3 - 16 CDE Eco-Power —13.5 cc/hp (18.3 cc/kW)

1990 Saab 9000 Difference from world average engine size

2.3 -16 Turbo —2.39 or 56 cc smaller

2.0 16V —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

2.0 - 16 Turbo CD —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

2.0 - 16 Turbo —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

2.3 - 16 —2.39 or 56 cc smaller

2.0 - 16 CD —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

2.0 -16 Turbo —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

2.0 -16 Turbo CD —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

2.3 - 16 CDE —2.39 or 56 cc smaller

2.3 - 16 CDE Turbo —2.39 or 56 cc smaller

3.0 - 24 V6 CD/CDE —26.26 or 616 cc bigger

2.3 - 16 CDE Eco-Power —2.39 or 56 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
2.3 -16 Turbo	2.29 L (2290 cc)	2.4% smaller	88 cc to 1 mpg	85 hp from 1 L	176 cc to 100 kg
2.0 16V	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	74 cc to 1 mpg	64 hp from 1 L	132 cc to 100 kg
2.0 - 16 Turbo CD	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	76 cc to 1 mpg	82 hp from 1 L	142 cc to 100 kg
2.0 - 16 Turbo	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	79 cc to 1 mpg	88 hp from 1 L	153 cc to 100 kg
2.3 - 16	2.29 L (2290 cc)	2.4% smaller	95 cc to 1 mpg	64 hp from 1 L	-
2.0 - 16 CD	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	74 cc to 1 mpg	75 hp from 1 L	142 cc to 100 kg
2.0 -16 Turbo	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	71 cc to 1 mpg	88 hp from 1 L	153 cc to 100 kg
2.0 -16 Turbo CD	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	-	93 hp from 1 L	-
2.3 - 16 CDE	2.29 L (2290 cc)	2.4% smaller	88 cc to 1 mpg	64 hp from 1 L	176 cc to 100 kg
2.3 - 16 CDE Turbo	2.29 L (2290 cc)	2.4% smaller	85 cc to 1 mpg	87 hp from 1 L	164 cc to 100 kg
3.0 - 24 V6 CD/CDE	2.96 L (2962 cc)	26.3% bigger	118 cc to 1 mpg	71 hp from 1 L	212 cc to 100 kg
2.3 - 16 CDE Eco-Power	2.29 L (2290 cc)	2.4% smaller	85 cc to 1 mpg	74 hp from 1 L	164 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	2.3 -16 Turbo
Precise engine size	2.29 L (2290 cc)
Difference from world average	2.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	88 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	85 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	176 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 16V
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	74 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	64 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	132 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 - 16 Turbo CD
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	76 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	82 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	142 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 - 16 Turbo
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	79 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	88 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	153 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.3 - 16
Precise engine size	2.29 L (2290 cc)
Difference from world average	2.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	95 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	64 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	-
Vehicle	2.0 - 16 CD
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	74 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	75 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	142 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 -16 Turbo
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	71 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	88 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	153 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 -16 Turbo CD
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	93 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	-
Vehicle	2.3 - 16 CDE
Precise engine size	2.29 L (2290 cc)
Difference from world average	2.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	88 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	64 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	176 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.3 - 16 CDE Turbo
Precise engine size	2.29 L (2290 cc)
Difference from world average	2.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	85 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	87 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	164 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	3.0 - 24 V6 CD/CDE
Precise engine size	2.96 L (2962 cc)
Difference from world average	26.3 bigger
Engine size to consumption ratio	118 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	71 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	212 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.3 - 16 CDE Eco-Power
Precise engine size	2.29 L (2290 cc)
Difference from world average	2.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	85 cc to 1 mpg
Horsepower from 1 L	74 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	164 cc to 100 kg