Saab 99 Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Saab 99 1977

- Average size for generation: 1.99 L (1985 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1985 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1985 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.36 L smaller (-361 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 16 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 397 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.4 L smaller (-6397 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.56 L bigger (+1561 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 100 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2.0 —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.0 Turbo —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.0 —18.6 cc/hp (25.1 cc/kW)

2.0 Turbo —13.5 cc/hp (18.4 cc/kW)

2.0 —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

2.0 Turbo —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
2.0	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	-	54 hp from 1 L	165 cc to 100 kg
2.0 Turbo	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	-	74 hp from 1 L	180 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	2.0
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	54 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	165 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 Turbo
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	74 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	180 cc to 100 kg

- Average size for generation: 1.9 L (1904 cc)
- Smallest engine for generation: 1.7 L (1709 cc)
- Largest engine for generation: 2 L (1985 cc)
- Difference from world average: 0.44 L smaller (-442 cc)
- Engine power to cc ratio: 20 cc per 1 hp
- Engine size to 1 passenger: 381 cc to 1 person
- Difference from world's biggest: 6.5 L smaller (-6478 cc)
- Difference from world's smallest: 1.48 L bigger (+1480 cc)
- Torque from 1 liter: 83 Nm from 1 L
- Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2.0 —1985 cc (1985 L)

1.7 —1709 cc (1709 L)

2.0 EMS —1985 cc (1985 L)

1.8S —1855 cc (1855 L)

2.0 GL —1985 cc (1985 L)

2.0 —20.9 cc/hp (28.4 cc/kW)

1.7 —21.1 cc/hp (28.5 cc/kW)

2.0 EMS —16.8 cc/hp (22.8 cc/kW)

1.8S —21.3 cc/hp (29 cc/kW)

2.0 GL —19.9 cc/hp (26.8 cc/kW)

2.0 —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

1.7 —27.15 or 637 cc smaller

2.0 EMS —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

1.8S —20.93 or 491 cc smaller

2.0 GL —15.39 or 361 cc smaller

Vehicle	Precise engine size	Difference from world average	Engine size to consumption ratio	Horsepower from 1 L	Engine size to 100 kg of weight
2.0	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	-	48 hp from 1 L	165 cc to 100 kg
1.7	1.71 L (1709 cc)	27.2% smaller	-	47 hp from 1 L	190 cc to 100 kg
2.0 EMS	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	-	59 hp from 1 L	165 cc to 100 kg
1.8S	1.86 L (1855 cc)	20.9% smaller	-	47 hp from 1 L	169 cc to 100 kg
2.0 GL	1.99 L (1985 cc)	15.4% smaller	-	50 hp from 1 L	165 cc to 100 kg

Vehicle	2.0
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	48 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	165 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.7
Precise engine size	1.71 L (1709 cc)
Difference from world average	27.2 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	47 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	190 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 EMS
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	59 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	165 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	1.8S
Precise engine size	1.86 L (1855 cc)
Difference from world average	20.9 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	47 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	169 cc to 100 kg
Vehicle	2.0 GL
Precise engine size	1.99 L (1985 cc)
Difference from world average	15.4 smaller
Engine size to consumption ratio	-
Horsepower from 1 L	50 hp from 1 L
Engine size to 100 kg of weight	165 cc to 100 kg