cat_logo
HomeSsangyong

Rexton

SsangYong Rexton Engine Size in Quick-to-Read Charts

Choose Generation

Average Engine Size SsangYong Rexton

SsangYong Rexton 2017

2017 Rexton II

Quick notes on SsangYong Rexton engine size

    • Average size for generation: 2.08 L (2078 cc)
    • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
    • Largest engine for generation: 2.2 L (2157 cc)
    • Difference from world average: 0.27 L smaller (-268 cc)
    • Engine power to cc ratio: 10 cc per 1 hp
    • Engine size to 1 passenger: 346 cc to 1 person
    • Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6304 cc)
    • Difference from world's smallest: 1.65 L bigger (+1654 cc)
    • Torque from 1 liter: 185 Nm from 1 L
    • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

2017 SsangYong Rexton

  • 2.2 e-XDi —2157 cc (2157 L)
  • 2.0 e-XGDi —1998 cc (1998 L)

    2017 SsangYong Rexton Engine size to power ratio

  • 2.2 e-XDi —11.9 cc/hp (16.2 cc/kW)
  • 2.0 e-XGDi —8.9 cc/hp (12.1 cc/kW)

    2017 SsangYong Rexton Difference from world average engine size

  • 2.2 e-XDi —8.06 or 189 cc smaller
  • 2.0 e-XGDi —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    2.2 e-XDi 2.16 L
    (2157 cc)     		8.1% smaller - 84 hp from 1 L 98 cc to 100 kg
    2.0 e-XGDi 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller 87 cc to 1 mpg 112 hp from 1 L 95 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.2 e-XDi
    Precise engine size 2.16 L (2157 cc)
    Difference from world average 8.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 84 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 98 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 2.0 e-XGDi
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 87 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 112 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 95 cc to 100 kg

    SsangYong Rexton 2012

    2012 Rexton I (facelift 2012)

    Quick notes on SsangYong Rexton engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.08 L (2078 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2 L (1998 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 2.2 L (2157 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.27 L smaller (-268 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 12 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 416 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 6.3 L smaller (-6304 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 1.65 L bigger (+1654 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 183 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 6 / 10

    2012 SsangYong Rexton

  • 220 e-XDi —2157 cc (2157 L)
  • 200 e-XDi —1998 cc (1998 L)

    2012 SsangYong Rexton Engine size to power ratio

  • 220 e-XDi —12.1 cc/hp (16.5 cc/kW)
  • 200 e-XDi —12.9 cc/hp (17.5 cc/kW)

    2012 SsangYong Rexton Difference from world average engine size

  • 220 e-XDi —8.06 or 189 cc smaller
  • 200 e-XDi —14.83 or 348 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    220 e-XDi 2.16 L
    (2157 cc)     		8.1% smaller - 82 hp from 1 L 108 cc to 100 kg
    200 e-XDi 2 L
    (1998 cc)     		14.8% smaller 67 cc to 1 mpg 78 hp from 1 L 100 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 220 e-XDi
    Precise engine size 2.16 L (2157 cc)
    Difference from world average 8.1 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 82 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 108 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle 200 e-XDi
    Precise engine size 2 L (1998 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.8 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 67 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 78 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 100 cc to 100 kg

    SsangYong Rexton 2006

    2006 Rexton I (facelift 2006)

    Quick notes on SsangYong Rexton engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.82 L (2822 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2.7 L (2696 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 3.2 L (3199 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.48 L bigger (+476 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 15 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 564 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 5.6 L smaller (-5560 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 2.4 L bigger (+2398 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 124 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 8 / 10

    2006 SsangYong Rexton

  • RX 270 Xdi Automatic —2696 cc (2696 L)
  • RX 270 XVT Automatic —2696 cc (2696 L)
  • RX 270 Xdi MT —2696 cc (2696 L)
  • RX 320 Automatic —3199 cc (3199 L)

    2006 SsangYong Rexton Engine size to power ratio

  • RX 270 Xdi Automatic —16.5 cc/hp (22.5 cc/kW)
  • RX 270 XVT Automatic —14.5 cc/hp (19.7 cc/kW)
  • RX 270 Xdi MT —16.5 cc/hp (22.5 cc/kW)
  • RX 320 Automatic —14.5 cc/hp (19.7 cc/kW)

    2006 SsangYong Rexton Difference from world average engine size

  • RX 270 Xdi Automatic —14.92 or 350 cc bigger
  • RX 270 XVT Automatic —14.92 or 350 cc bigger
  • RX 270 Xdi MT —14.92 or 350 cc bigger
  • RX 320 Automatic —36.36 or 853 cc bigger

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    RX 270 Xdi Automatic 2.7 L
    (2696 cc)     		14.9% bigger 112 cc to 1 mpg 60 hp from 1 L 150 cc to 100 kg
    RX 270 XVT Automatic 2.7 L
    (2696 cc)     		14.9% bigger 104 cc to 1 mpg 69 hp from 1 L 150 cc to 100 kg
    RX 270 Xdi MT 2.7 L
    (2696 cc)     		14.9% bigger 100 cc to 1 mpg 60 hp from 1 L 150 cc to 100 kg
    RX 320 Automatic 3.2 L
    (3199 cc)     		36.4% bigger 200 cc to 1 mpg 69 hp from 1 L 178 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle RX 270 Xdi Automatic
    Precise engine size 2.7 L (2696 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 112 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 60 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 150 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle RX 270 XVT Automatic
    Precise engine size 2.7 L (2696 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 104 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 69 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 150 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle RX 270 Xdi MT
    Precise engine size 2.7 L (2696 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 100 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 60 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 150 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle RX 320 Automatic
    Precise engine size 3.2 L (3199 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.4 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 200 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 69 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 178 cc to 100 kg

    SsangYong Rexton 2001

    2001 Rexton I

    Quick notes on SsangYong Rexton engine size

      • Average size for generation: 2.77 L (2766 cc)
      • Smallest engine for generation: 2.3 L (2295 cc)
      • Largest engine for generation: 3.2 L (3199 cc)
      • Difference from world average: 0.42 L bigger (+420 cc)
      • Engine power to cc ratio: 17 cc per 1 hp
      • Engine size to 1 passenger: 553 cc to 1 person
      • Difference from world's biggest: 5.6 L smaller (-5616 cc)
      • Difference from world's smallest: 2.34 L bigger (+2342 cc)
      • Torque from 1 liter: 99 Nm from 1 L
      • Enginert rating: 8 / 10

    2001 SsangYong Rexton

  • RX 320 —3199 cc (3199 L)
  • RX 290 TD —2874 cc (2874 L)
  • RX 270 Xdi —2696 cc (2696 L)
  • RX 230 —2295 cc (2295 L)

    2001 SsangYong Rexton Engine size to power ratio

  • RX 320 —14.5 cc/hp (19.7 cc/kW)
  • RX 290 TD —24 cc/hp (32.7 cc/kW)
  • RX 270 Xdi —16.5 cc/hp (22.5 cc/kW)
  • RX 230 —16 cc/hp (21.9 cc/kW)

    2001 SsangYong Rexton Difference from world average engine size

  • RX 320 —36.36 or 853 cc bigger
  • RX 290 TD —22.51 or 528 cc bigger
  • RX 270 Xdi —14.92 or 350 cc bigger
  • RX 230 —2.17 or 51 cc smaller

    • Vehicle Precise engine size Difference from world average Engine size to consumption ratio Horsepower from 1 L Engine size to 100 kg of weight
    RX 320 3.2 L
    (3199 cc)     		36.4% bigger - 69 hp from 1 L 168 cc to 100 kg
    RX 290 TD 2.87 L
    (2874 cc)     		22.5% bigger 115 cc to 1 mpg 42 hp from 1 L 151 cc to 100 kg
    RX 270 Xdi 2.7 L
    (2696 cc)     		14.9% bigger 100 cc to 1 mpg 60 hp from 1 L 150 cc to 100 kg
    RX 230 2.3 L
    (2295 cc)     		2.2% smaller 115 cc to 1 mpg 62 hp from 1 L 128 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle RX 320
    Precise engine size 3.2 L (3199 cc)
    Difference from world average 36.4 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio -
    Horsepower from 1 L 69 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 168 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle RX 290 TD
    Precise engine size 2.87 L (2874 cc)
    Difference from world average 22.5 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 115 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 42 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 151 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle RX 270 Xdi
    Precise engine size 2.7 L (2696 cc)
    Difference from world average 14.9 bigger
    Engine size to consumption ratio 100 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 60 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 150 cc to 100 kg
    Vehicle RX 230
    Precise engine size 2.3 L (2295 cc)
    Difference from world average 2.2 smaller
    Engine size to consumption ratio 115 cc to 1 mpg
    Horsepower from 1 L 62 hp from 1 L
    Engine size to 100 kg of weight 128 cc to 100 kg