Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
2.5 L (2498 cc) |
6.5% bigger | 76 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | - |
e-Boxer 2.0 |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 75 hp from 1 L | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 76 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | e-Boxer 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 117 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sport 2.0 T |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 120 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.0d |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Trend 2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Sport 2.0d |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Platinum 2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Sport 2.0 T |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 120 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Trend 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Sport 2.0d |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 118 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Platinum 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 121 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 |
2.5 L (2498 cc) |
6.5% bigger | 86 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 121 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 86 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 74 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 74 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0X |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
2.5XS |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 98 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
2.5XT |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 112 cc to 1 mpg | 93 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
2.0TD XS EC-VQ |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0X |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5XS |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 98 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5XT |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 112 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 93 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0TD XS EC-VQ |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 X |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 XT |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 89 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 i 16V Turbo |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | - | 86 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 X |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 XT |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 89 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 i 16V Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 86 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 S -Turbo |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 85 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 61 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 S -Turbo |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 85 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |