2017 Impreza V Sedan
2017 Impreza V Hatchback
2015 Impreza IV Hatchback (facelift 2015)
2015 Impreza IV Sedan (facelift 2015)
2012 Impreza IV Hatchback
2012 Impreza IV Sedan
2008 Impreza III Sedan
2008 Impreza III Hatchback
2001 Impreza II Station Wagon
2001 Impreza II
1993 Impreza I Station Wagon (GF)
1995 Impreza I Coupe (GFC)
1993 Impreza I (GC)
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 76 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 76 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
1.6 L (1600 cc) |
31.8% smaller | 42 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1600 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 42 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
1.6 L (1600 cc) |
31.8% smaller | 40 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 59 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1600 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 40 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 59 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
1.6 L (1600 cc) |
31.8% smaller | 40 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
1.6i sport |
1.6 L (1600 cc) |
31.8% smaller | 43 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 123 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i sport |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1600 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 40 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6i sport |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1600 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 43 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i sport |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6i |
1.6 L (1600 cc) |
31.8% smaller | 47 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 123 cc to 100 kg |
1.6i sport |
1.6 L (1600 cc) |
31.8% smaller | 47 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i sport |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1600 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 47 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 123 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6i sport |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1600 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 47 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i sport |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 143 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | - | 69 hp from 1 L | 176 cc to 100 kg |
WRX 2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 107 cc to 1 mpg | 108 hp from 1 L | 176 cc to 100 kg |
1.5R |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 115 cc to 100 kg |
2.0R |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
WRX STI 2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 107 cc to 1 mpg | 119 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 176 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | WRX 2.5 |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 107 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 108 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 176 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5R |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 115 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0R |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | WRX STI 2.5 |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 107 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 119 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | - | 69 hp from 1 L | 176 cc to 100 kg |
WRX 2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 102 cc to 1 mpg | 91 hp from 1 L | 176 cc to 100 kg |
1.5i |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | - | 73 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
R 1.5 |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 115 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
2.0R |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
WRX STI 2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | - | 134 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 176 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | WRX 2.5 |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 102 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 91 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 176 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5i |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | R 1.5 |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 115 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0R |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | WRX STI 2.5 |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 134 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 80 hp from 1 L | - |
1.6i 16V |
1.6 L (1597 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 61 cc to 1 mpg | 59 hp from 1 L | 114 cc to 100 kg |
WRX 2.0 16V |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 87 cc to 1 mpg | 110 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
WRX 2.0i 16V |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 113 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
WRX STi 2.0 16V |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 105 cc to 1 mpg | 133 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
WRX 2.5 Turbo |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 107 cc to 1 mpg | 93 hp from 1 L | 176 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 80 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 1.6i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1597 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 61 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 114 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | WRX 2.0 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 87 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 110 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | WRX 2.0i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 113 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | WRX STi 2.0 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 105 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 133 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | WRX 2.5 Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 107 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 93 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 176 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i 16V |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 78 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
1.5 16V |
1.5 L (1498 cc) |
36.1% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 107 cc to 100 kg |
1.6i |
1.6 L (1597 cc) |
31.9% smaller | - | 59 hp from 1 L | 145 cc to 100 kg |
WRX 2.0i 16V |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 113 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
RS 2.5i 16V |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | - | 68 hp from 1 L | 176 cc to 100 kg |
WRX STI 2.5 Turbo |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 112 cc to 1 mpg | 114 hp from 1 L | - |
WRX 2.5 Turbo |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 107 cc to 1 mpg | 93 hp from 1 L | - |
WRX STi 2.0 16V |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 105 cc to 1 mpg | 133 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i 16V |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 78 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.5 L (1498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.1 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 107 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1597 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 145 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | WRX 2.0i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 113 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | RS 2.5i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 176 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | WRX STI 2.5 Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 112 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 114 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | WRX 2.5 Turbo |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 107 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 93 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | WRX STi 2.0 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 105 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 133 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT 2.0 Turbo |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 110 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i |
1.82 L (1820 cc) |
22.4% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
1.6i |
1.6 L (1597 cc) |
31.9% smaller | - | 59 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
1.5i 16V |
1.49 L (1493 cc) |
36.4% smaller | - | 65 hp from 1 L | 136 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 16V |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i Turbo |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 106 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | GT 2.0 Turbo |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 110 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Precise engine size | 1.82 L (1820 cc) |
Difference from world average | 22.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1597 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.5i 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.49 L (1493 cc) |
Difference from world average | 36.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 65 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 136 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 16V |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i Turbo |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 106 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 98 cc to 1 mpg | 68 hp from 1 L | 189 cc to 100 kg |
1.6 |
1.6 L (1597 cc) |
31.9% smaller | - | 56 hp from 1 L | 145 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 141 hp from 1 L | 166 cc to 100 kg |
2.2i 16V |
2.21 L (2212 cc) |
5.7% smaller | 88 cc to 1 mpg | 61 hp from 1 L | 184 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 Turbo |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 106 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 98 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 68 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 189 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1597 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 145 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 141 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 166 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2i 16V |
Precise engine size | 2.21 L (2212 cc) |
Difference from world average | 5.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 88 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 184 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 Turbo |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 106 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
GT 2.0 Turbo |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 106 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 58 hp from 1 L | 181 cc to 100 kg |
1.8i |
1.82 L (1820 cc) |
22.4% smaller | 67 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
1.6i |
1.6 L (1597 cc) |
31.9% smaller | 55 cc to 1 mpg | 56 hp from 1 L | 145 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | GT 2.0 Turbo |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 106 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 181 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.8i |
Precise engine size | 1.82 L (1820 cc) |
Difference from world average | 22.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 67 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6i |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1597 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 55 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 56 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 145 cc to 100 kg |