2020 Legacy VII
2017 Legacy VI (facelift 2017)
2015 Legacy VI
2012 Legacy V Station Wagon (facelift 2012)
2012 Legacy V (facelift 2012)
2009 Legacy V
2009 Legacy V Station Wagon
2006 Legacy IV (facelift 2006)
2006 Legacy IV Station Wagon (facelift 2006)
2004 Legacy IV
2004 Legacy IV Station Wagon
2001 Legacy III (BE,BH, facelift 2001)
2001 Legacy III Station Wagon (BE,BH, facelift 2001)
1999 Legacy III Station Wagon (BE,BH)
1999 Legacy III (BE,BH)
1994 Legacy II (BD,BG)
1994 Legacy II Station Wagon (BD,BG)
1991 Legacy I (BC, facelift 1991)
1991 Legacy I Station Wagon (BJF, facelift 1991)
1989 Legacy I (BC)
1989 Legacy I Station Wagon (BJF)
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.4 Turbo |
2.38 L (2384 cc) |
1.6% bigger | 88 cc to 1 mpg | 109 hp from 1 L | 140 cc to 100 kg |
2.5i |
2.5 L (2498 cc) |
6.5% bigger | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.4 Turbo |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.38 L (2384 cc) |
Difference from world average | 1.6 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 88 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 109 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 140 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i |
2.5 L (2498 cc) |
6.5% bigger | - | 70 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
3.6R |
3.63 L (3630 cc) |
54.7% bigger | - | 71 hp from 1 L | 214 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.6R |
Precise engine size | 3.63 L (3630 cc) |
Difference from world average | 54.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 214 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i |
2.5 L (2498 cc) |
6.5% bigger | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 156 cc to 100 kg |
3.6R |
3.63 L (3629 cc) |
54.7% bigger | 158 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 227 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 156 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.6R |
Precise engine size | 3.63 L (3629 cc) |
Difference from world average | 54.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 158 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 227 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0d Sport |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.0d |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.5i |
2.5 L (2498 cc) |
6.5% bigger | 78 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
2.5i Sport |
2.5 L (2498 cc) |
6.5% bigger | 81 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0d Sport |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 78 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i Sport |
Precise engine size | 2.5 L (2498 cc) |
Difference from world average | 6.5 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 81 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 167 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0d Sport |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
3.6R |
3.63 L (3629 cc) |
54.7% bigger | 181 cc to 1 mpg | 71 hp from 1 L | 227 cc to 100 kg |
2.5i |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 102 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0d Sport |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.6R |
Precise engine size | 3.63 L (3629 cc) |
Difference from world average | 54.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 181 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 227 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 102 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.6R |
3.63 L (3630 cc) |
54.7% bigger | - | 71 hp from 1 L | 227 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 69 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0d |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 50 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.5i |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | - | 69 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 GT |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | - | 108 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.6R |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3.63 L (3630 cc) |
Difference from world average | 54.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 71 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 227 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 69 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 50 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 GT |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 108 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0i |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.5i sport |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 88 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.5i |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 85 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 154 cc to 100 kg |
2.0d |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 GT |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 112 cc to 1 mpg | 108 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
2.0d sport |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 54 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i sport |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 88 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 85 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 154 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 GT |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 112 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 108 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0d sport |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 54 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0R |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
3.0R spec.B |
3 L (3000 cc) |
27.9% bigger | 125 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 188 cc to 100 kg |
2.5i GT |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | - | 102 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
2.0d |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 48 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.5i |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 88 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0R |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0R spec.B |
Precise engine size | 3 L (3000 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 125 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 188 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i GT |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 102 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 48 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 88 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0R |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.0d |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 49 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.5i |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 91 cc to 1 mpg | 70 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
3.0R spec.B |
3 L (3000 cc) |
27.9% bigger | 158 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 188 cc to 100 kg |
3.0R |
3 L (3000 cc) |
27.9% bigger | 125 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 188 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0R |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0d |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 49 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 91 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 70 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0R spec.B |
Precise engine size | 3 L (3000 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 158 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 188 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0R |
Precise engine size | 3 L (3000 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 125 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 188 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5i |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 85 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 176 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 64 cc to 1 mpg | 69 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
3.0i spec.B |
3 L (2999 cc) |
27.8% bigger | 158 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 187 cc to 100 kg |
2.0R |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 71 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 85 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 176 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 64 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0i spec.B |
Precise engine size | 3 L (2999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 158 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 187 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0R |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 71 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.0R spec.B |
3 L (2999 cc) |
27.8% bigger | 158 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 187 cc to 100 kg |
2.0i |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 69 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
2.5i |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 88 cc to 1 mpg | 67 hp from 1 L | 176 cc to 100 kg |
2.0R |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 83 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
3.0R |
3 L (2999 cc) |
27.8% bigger | 125 cc to 1 mpg | 82 hp from 1 L | 187 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0R spec.B |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 3 L (2999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 158 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 187 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0i |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 69 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5i |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 88 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 67 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 176 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0R |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 83 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 3.0R |
Precise engine size | 3 L (2999 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.8 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 125 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 82 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 187 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 63 hp from 1 L | - |
2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | - | 63 hp from 1 L | - |
3.0 |
3 L (3000 cc) |
27.9% bigger | 115 cc to 1 mpg | 73 hp from 1 L | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 3.0 |
Precise engine size | 3 L (3000 cc) |
Difference from world average | 27.9 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 115 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 73 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 200 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | - | 63 hp from 1 L | - |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 95 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 176 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 95 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 176 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | 95 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 176 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 63 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 95 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 176 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 63 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | - | 61 hp from 1 L | 189 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 |
2.21 L (2212 cc) |
5.7% smaller | 88 cc to 1 mpg | 59 hp from 1 L | 170 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 turbo |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 101 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
2.0 |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 80 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 189 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 |
Precise engine size | 2.21 L (2212 cc) |
Difference from world average | 5.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 88 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 170 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 turbo |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 101 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 80 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2.0 |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
2.2 |
2.21 L (2212 cc) |
5.7% smaller | - | 59 hp from 1 L | 184 cc to 100 kg |
2.5 |
2.46 L (2457 cc) |
4.7% bigger | - | 61 hp from 1 L | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.0 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.2 |
Precise engine size | 2.21 L (2212 cc) |
Difference from world average | 5.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 184 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2.5 |
Precise engine size | 2.46 L (2457 cc) |
Difference from world average | 4.7 bigger |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 61 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 164 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000 |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
2200 |
2.21 L (2212 cc) |
5.7% smaller | 85 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | 184 cc to 100 kg |
1800 |
1.82 L (1820 cc) |
22.4% smaller | - | 57 hp from 1 L | 140 cc to 100 kg |
1600 |
1.6 L (1597 cc) |
31.9% smaller | - | 59 hp from 1 L | - |
2000 turbo |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 111 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2000 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2200 |
Precise engine size | 2.21 L (2212 cc) |
Difference from world average | 5.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 85 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 184 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1800 |
Precise engine size | 1.82 L (1820 cc) |
Difference from world average | 22.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 140 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1600 |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1597 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2000 turbo |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 111 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000 |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 58 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
1800 |
1.82 L (1820 cc) |
22.4% smaller | - | 57 hp from 1 L | - |
2200 |
2.21 L (2212 cc) |
5.7% smaller | - | 62 hp from 1 L | 158 cc to 100 kg |
1600 |
1.6 L (1597 cc) |
31.9% smaller | - | 59 hp from 1 L | 133 cc to 100 kg |
2000 turbo |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 83 cc to 1 mpg | 101 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2000 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 58 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1800 |
Precise engine size | 1.82 L (1820 cc) |
Difference from world average | 22.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | - |
Vehicle | 2200 |
Precise engine size | 2.21 L (2212 cc) |
Difference from world average | 5.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 158 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1600 |
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1597 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.9 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 59 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 133 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2000 turbo |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 83 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 101 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2200 |
2.21 L (2212 cc) |
5.7% smaller | 92 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | 170 cc to 100 kg |
1800 |
1.82 L (1820 cc) |
22.4% smaller | - | 57 hp from 1 L | 165 cc to 100 kg |
2000 |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | - | 75 hp from 1 L | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2200 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 2.21 L (2212 cc) |
Difference from world average | 5.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 92 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 170 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1800 |
Precise engine size | 1.82 L (1820 cc) |
Difference from world average | 22.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 165 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2000 |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | - |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 153 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1800 |
1.82 L (1820 cc) |
22.4% smaller | 70 cc to 1 mpg | 57 hp from 1 L | 152 cc to 100 kg |
2000 turbo |
1.99 L (1994 cc) |
15% smaller | 77 cc to 1 mpg | 101 hp from 1 L | 142 cc to 100 kg |
2200 |
2.21 L (2212 cc) |
5.7% smaller | 88 cc to 1 mpg | 62 hp from 1 L | 158 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1800 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.82 L (1820 cc) |
Difference from world average | 22.4 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 70 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 57 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 152 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2000 turbo |
Precise engine size | 1.99 L (1994 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 77 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 101 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 142 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 2200 |
Precise engine size | 2.21 L (2212 cc) |
Difference from world average | 5.7 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 88 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 62 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 158 cc to 100 kg |