Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
1.6 L (1600 cc) |
31.8% smaller | 47 cc to 1 mpg | 106 hp from 1 L | 100 cc to 100 kg |
GT-S 2.0 |
2 L (1998 cc) |
14.8% smaller | 74 cc to 1 mpg | 134 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
GT 2.0 |
2 L (1995 cc) |
15% smaller | 60 cc to 1 mpg | 75 hp from 1 L | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1600 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 47 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 106 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 100 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | GT-S 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1998 cc) |
Difference from world average | 14.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 74 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 134 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | GT 2.0 |
Precise engine size | 2 L (1995 cc) |
Difference from world average | 15 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 60 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 75 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 125 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | Precise engine size | Difference from world average | Engine size to consumption ratio | Horsepower from 1 L | Engine size to 100 kg of weight |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1.6 |
1.6 L (1600 cc) |
31.8% smaller | 47 cc to 1 mpg | 106 hp from 1 L | 107 cc to 100 kg |
Vehicle | 1.6 |
---|---|
Precise engine size | 1.6 L (1600 cc) |
Difference from world average | 31.8 smaller |
Engine size to consumption ratio | 47 cc to 1 mpg |
Horsepower from 1 L | 106 hp from 1 L |
Engine size to 100 kg of weight | 107 cc to 100 kg |